TAW_Impalor

I do vertical loops and look up

more multiplayer servers run 1.5

No idea if it's true, but saw this: "GeForce GTX 1080 Ti graphics cards, including the NVIDIA Founders Edition, will be available worldwide — across 238 countries and territories — from NVIDIA GeForce partners, including ASUS, EVGA, Gainward, Galaxy, Gigabyte, iGame, Innovision 3D, MSI, Palit, PNY and Zotac, starting March 10th at 10am." http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/nvidia-geforce-gtx-1080-ti

January 3 "was" already the launch day. Where is your information coming from? Can't believe both NVidia and AMD did this to us...

Not sure about Dropbox, but I was using a .cmd file with some xcopy /s /d /Y commands to synchronize my folders before launching DCS. That was before I gave up on 2.0 alfa. Waiting for 2.5 to have a fresh install...

I don't need mouse for comms menu at all. Can I disable it?

There are mods to put Mig21 in the start menu hangar. I've put mine on Kuznetsov carrier (attached). Then you just get up and walk around. To be able to "lay down" on the floor you must calibrate your Rift in the seated position. So that when you re-center in DCS before standing up, your head will be as far away from the virtual floor as in real life. VR - Kuznecow Carrier aircraft.rar

From the HANGAR floor - must me more than 2 meters to the top of the canopy. The plane hight is 4.7 m!

The height is the height, in VR or RL. If I can lower my head to the floor of the VR garage and then stand up, my eye level should be the same as in real life (I am 185 cm). If my head now is above the Mig21 canopy, something is wrong!

I agree it is small. Many times discussed in various threads. But the most convincing thing is to put Mig21 in virtual garage and stand next to it...

Same thoughts after the latest patches! Flying quick dogfight missions and cannot see sh*t in VR (((

Fast ocsillations between 90 and 45 FPS are around 11 ms rendering latency. When at or under, 90 FPS is achievable, when over - ATW kicks in and the game runs at 45. I do not understand the conclusion, that DCS "is limited by itself" and no CPU/GPU pair can run it with Shadows On and Visibility > Low. In the penultimate chart you show that 10% CPU overclock increases average FPS by about 10%. So, the game, as has always been the case, relies on IT technology from the distant future (((.

I think they only work with Windows 10. Funny, Oculus recommends GTX 640 )) I use VNC Viewer on Android phone when my HDMI is occupied by OR.

put Mig21 in VR hangar and stand next to it. you will see it is no way 4.806m (15 ft 9 in) high. calibrate you hmd and test floor level by lying on it in the hangar. ))

I too see no difference between OFF and 16Q! But FPS is dropping in my case. Zoom into the two screens attached and notice how jagged the white text box is. I did re-launch DCS for changes to take effect. PD=1, of course.

7 months on, the bug is still present. And DCS just turned down my support ticket and told me to use this forum. What's the point?

Going myself from GTX760 to 1080 (and back TWICE!!), you will likely be disappointed to drop that kind of money for a barely noticeable gain. PD 2.0 is nice, but you will still see FPS dropping to 45 with ATW and targets appear as double. The only solution for me to get a stable 90 FPS is LOW visibility and NO shadows. 1080 works 90-100%, and CPU is slacking, but it still does need overclocking to push objects via DirectX bottleneck. I find PD 2 indeed improving readability of the instruments, but only in the center of your vision in OR. Off-sweetspot distortions drive me crazy and I cannot fly more than 10-15 minutes. I have 20/20 vision, so the whole thing gives me headaches if I fly longer ((( Just my $0.02.

Awesome!!!

Sorry, we seem to have mixed two threads, but the topic is roughly the same. I see not difference whatsoever in my tests whether MSAA in off or maxed out. 1080 chews up any objects you throw at it. The bottleneck is elsewhere, and the trick is to reduce the number of said objects. I also see no difference visually between Low and Medium visibility range, but the former gives me a couple more FPS. As for the trees distance maxed out - I hate it when they start appearing in front of my eyes.

Hi Shrike. Sorry. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2884624&postcount=10

Well, my (HT)PC is inside a niche in the wall under TV with plenty of space around and one big fan blowing air in (and onto the video card), and three smaller ones blowing hot air out. It is now very hot in Spain (+30 at home), so I opened the doors for hot air to escape. I played a lot with the game specs and OC settings. No one here, as far as I know, can play DCS at max settings in VR with any hardware. I am getting smooth 45-90 FPS and nice visuals with the attached settings, 1928/10500 card clocks, 372.70 driver, DCS 1.5.4. stable, "VR Shadows" and "No tree shadows" mods. My Fire Storm score is 17200...

Ah, sorry, you mean GTX 760 in my sig? Forgot to change. I bought another GTX 1080 (Gigabyte Xtreme Gaming Premium Pack) and testing it now. Will RMA, same as ASUS Strix two weeks ago, due to these problems: I am having good FPS with Ultra Shadows and PD 2.0, but the card gets too hot when running below its advetrised specs - up to 88C in open case (( I think I'll wait and buy 1080ti on water...

Tried these two files and see a 27% drop in FPS comparing to this single file: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php...4&postcount=10 I test using FRAPS average for 1 minute on the same reply track. I have Ultimate Shadows and No Tree Shadow mod...

This is similar to what you want: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2884624&postcount=10 I get slightly better FPS with it on Ultra shadows, though I don't know if he limited them to cockpit only.

Thanks! I do need this option and the devs could be clearer.