amalahama

Is the Shrike still been considered? And the Walleye I?

As stated, the problem is really evident in large targets such as frigates, HARMS always impact on ship centroid instead of the actual radar emitter.

As the title says, is SAM Multiple engagement capability (in the SA-10 for example) modelled in DCS?

Hi, any news on this? I really love the SA-4 and it would add a nice tactical dimension to current IADS in game

Fantastic post @Fri13 I would add absolute lack of wind correction in CCIP and AUTO modes

Artic scenery anyone?

Unfortunately we have perfectly boresighted Mavs, in comparison with Viper's. We don't have even the option (existing in RL). I would love Mavs in the Hornet gets improved to the level of the Viper's.

Harriers sidearm are the bugged ones, not the HARMS. In general, antiradiation missiles are a denial weapon, it forces enemy forces to turn their radar off, but for destruction you need to use more conventional means, since ARM pk is in general quite poor

No you can't. You operate pretty much of your sensors through the large TADS display only available in Copilot's cockpit

And what happened with the PB mode!?

Welcome to real life buddy!

OK thats interesting. I might try as well. Thanks for the note

I don't understand this post. I can designate any empty area in RWS mode and the scan would automatically recenter. My only issue is that if it happens to be any contact close to the area where I designated it automatically enters into STT, which is annoying

I confirm. This also happen with rockets. Dumb bombs on CCIP however seems to be accurate. This post should be moved to BUG section and take care by developers

Well when you uncage the maverick it points to the current target point (whose source could be the TGP) with deadly precision, which should only be attained when you boresight it. The process in the viper still applies to the hornet even if the hornet doesn't have the direct handover capability

Just watch last wags video about maverick boresighting and you will understand my query

Why mavericks in the hornet can't be boresighted like in the F-16? I could understand if mavericks worked stand alone but they can be pointed by the TGP and I assume that as in the viper the alignment might not be perfect all times

Pity that impact angle and velocity don't affect the damage inflicted to the target

Does it now? Drift was not modelled until before this patch, nor navigational fixes were introduced yet

In Wags' video, he mentioned an updated manual was included in the next patch but I can't find any...

Now actually that's an interesting question. Since PP are fed from the same hornet mission computer, I would assume they are special waypoints, like markpoints for example. I think they should be accessible but I can't confirm how the real thing works

A-10C systems are not at par with latest EDs addons like the F-18. Electrical system modeling is very basic too. And there is no INS drift modeled either. Those things I hope we will see them improved in the incoming months

That's a very nice surprise! Actually it's an undocumented feature, the manual doesn't say a word about this new options.

My theory - if sales goes well, we might see those circles, boxes and lines when the universal cartridge system is implemented. I want to be optimistic on this one

Did GRID make it in the 30th update?