MYSE1234

The altimeter is also more accurate now. Before it could be off by hundreds of meters, now it's +-30m or so from my testing.

Love to hear it, thank you very much. :thumbup: Might I ask exactly what's been changed?

I did some more calculations and the current fuel flow at sea level is equivelent to ISA +35, which is 50°c. The bump is there because I needed to use zone 1 on the A/B to keep 92%. It shouldn't be needed, but that's what it's like.

I thought the graphs would be pretty self explanatory, and would be fine as they are. I guess I was wrong.. Edit: Alright, it should now all be translated to english so that every one can understand it.

I could do that, but that would require about the same amount of effort as using google translate on the few words that are needed to understand. :music_whistling: It wasn't meant for other people to see, and I just can't be bothered translating it. The few who need to see it know what it all says, the rest is a bonus.

I've been working on a mission planning tool, and have therefore been gathering data about fuel consumption for Viggen at different speeds and configurations. In the data I could see some strange things happening. One of those things were fuel consumption dropping with altitude, as expected. However when you get to 5km alt. it starts going back up again, to almost the same consumption as on sea level. Which it shouldn't be doing. Another thing is the mach number at mil power. The mach number is the same until you get to 5000m, where it starts increasing smoothly, very close to the real values. Only 5000m offset. At sea level with 92% NHT, you should have a mach number of around 0,67. In DCS it's 0,82. The real data is from "SFI AJ37, del 3. Kap IV", page 11 and 16. As with all data it's not going to be 100% accurate, so my measured values might not be 100% accurate, but quite close. Feel free to have a look yourself.

QNH is in the briefing screen as far as I know, around the same place where you see wind and temperature.

Yes, that part I agree with you, but it's not critical for the function of the jet and it's systems.

If you are in NAV, CK37 will calculate your position so that it knows where you are, even if you land. You can also change waypoins in NAV no problem, you can even load new cartridges while in NAV (flying). Not sure if that's possible or advisable in the real aircraft, but it's very possible in DCS.

The TILS-fix when landing combined with TERNAV should take care off any drift in the system. I've never had any problem not switching over to BER. I usualy do though, unless like now, it's forced upon us.

There's is no need to do that, it works fine anyway.

Haven't we already gotten the new AB effects, or is there newer ones on the way still? https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=218990

I'd say that the afteburner effect is too small. If you go by , you can see that the flame lenght is about 2/3 of the aircraft itself.

Already talked about: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=274875

Yes, the guage still has a limit of 8G, so it won't go above that. Even though the aircraft can go above that.

I've also experienced CTDs when setting it to BER, but it also happens when I close the HP fuel valve.

I've done some research on all the weapon weights for AJS37. Between the 75 and 75T, the 75T is closest to the real life weight, if you include the mounting rail. All weight below are with the rail included, and as you can see, most things are too light if anything. The 75 has it's weight without the rail, otherwise correct. Most of these are from "SFI AJS37, del 2" kap. 4, p.34, or page 190. [TABLE]Weapon Real DCS Diff SB 609 609 0 LB 285 220 −65 RA 387 372 −15 75 258 210 −48 75T 343 354 11 04 661 661 0 15 605 610 5 05 341 341 0 BK 605 605 0 AK 364 276 −88 74 123 90 −33 24J 119 90 −29 KA 348 348 0 KB 316 296 −20 XT 195 195 0 [/TABLE]

Not sure what you're doing, but it's definitely possible to go higher than 8G.

I belive he might have meant this airplane, Gustav 52.

Probably the nozzle i'd imagine. The nozzle on Viggen is not animated, the Tomcat I'm not sure about, I would think it is. TBF you can't really see the nozzle very clearly so I wouldn't place it very far up on the priority list.

If you've got an nvidia card you can add sharpening through the nvidia control panel. This also works in VR.

You might find this spreadsheet that I've made usefull. There are some strange things going on with the performance of our Viggen. These top values are when using Mil power, the second is 92% RPM (Nht). There is also a 2nd sheet with fuel flow relative to temperature. Spreadsheet

RB74 is back to being super smokey with this beta update.

The HUD jumping to the side is usualy TERNAV doing a fix of your position. It sounds strange that you would have that much drift that early in the flight, unless it's super far between WP 1 and 2, and you're flying high up in the air (which you are in the image), or if you're flying around like a mad man. :pilotfly:

That's what it should be doing. It's always extended on the ground per design.