-
Posts
2642 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Events
Everything posted by Hobel
-
Having a hard time avoiding AIM-120s fired from F-15
Hobel replied to Hoggorm's topic in DCS: F-16C Viper
I will look at the tracks later. But it should be said that the rwr warning is dynamic, which means that you can get a missle warning between 5-8nm, if you get the missle warning at 5nm and the missle is still very fast you hardly have time to react. Therefore, make your own timings and do not rely on the rwr warning. Otherwise Also fly high and fast and shoot as early as your radar allows against an f15. You can lock an f15 at 55-65nm. If you have a lock, shoot and dive down immediately. -
Following WAGS Marker Tutorial and seeing differences..
Hobel replied to RickJamesBish's topic in DCS: F-16C Viper
azimuth has no effect on DBS1-2, this used to work but has been fixed. https://forum.dcs.world/topic/302912-strange-ground-radar-behaviour-while-zooming-in/ -
Following WAGS Marker Tutorial and seeing differences..
Hobel replied to RickJamesBish's topic in DCS: F-16C Viper
1.) DBS1-2 is already the "best" possible mode. Depending on the set range scale, the respective DBS has its fixed areas and dcs represents them quite accurately. therefore azimuth has no influence on DBS, which is correct This is shown in DCS as follows: DBS1 mode it is always One-fourth of the selected range. from 10 range scale you see a square of 2.5nm 20nm>5nm 40nm>10nm DBS2 is from 1nm to max ~7nm, depending on selected scale. It depends which mode you mean? there is already a report for EXP. What do you mean exactly? this is reported Context : A-G Radar is also possible in DCS, use the right Scale as well as good angles Look: -
correct as-is Has the A-G FCR changed since these tutorials?
Hobel replied to RyanR's topic in DCS: F-16C Viper
have you seen the video? this is the "new" logic -
correct as-is Has the A-G FCR changed since these tutorials?
Hobel replied to RyanR's topic in DCS: F-16C Viper
Yes, there are a few changes. There are also a few open reports. I'll look them up and post them here as well as the changes. Edit: So far the A/G radar seems to work, but the thing that makes it most difficult to use is the "snapback" of the cursor every time you put it down, the whole image is reset, which makes it almost impossible to use. good to see here once IRL and once DCS -
TGP Auto Handoff to AGM-65D Causes Loss of SOI
Hobel replied to Sn0wMan4's topic in DCS: F-16C Viper
when tgp is soi, "TMS right" should reset the maverick seeker. -
TGP Auto Handoff to AGM-65D Causes Loss of SOI
Hobel replied to Sn0wMan4's topic in DCS: F-16C Viper
Not with Lau-88 but with Lau-88A it should work. -
Expectation on Air to Air missiles of the MiG-29A?
Hobel replied to pepin1234's topic in DCS: MiG-29A Fulcrum
Yes, but does this also apply to other aircraft that carry the 27ER? -
Expectation on Air to Air missiles of the MiG-29A?
Hobel replied to pepin1234's topic in DCS: MiG-29A Fulcrum
Oh, that sounds good, doesn't it? So tws/soft lock shoots not quite so absurd with 27ER -
Expectation on Air to Air missiles of the MiG-29A?
Hobel replied to pepin1234's topic in DCS: MiG-29A Fulcrum
a question about the guidance of the 27ER, the search head only switches to "active" or sees the target from a certain distance, depending on the size of the target different range, about 10-20km. so LOAL and the missle is steered close to the target via radio link until then. hence my assumption, is it possible to fire the 27ER in TWS and the Radar only automatically switches to STT when the missle is in Seeker range. in the initial phase, an STT would not necessarily be necessary because the missle does not yet see the radiation anyway. As with Fox3 shots, the advantages would be that the target is warned late. The disadvantage of course is that the update rate is not quite as high in TWS -
this is the big question I have about the radar, is it correct as it is or should the track be correlated? Is there any free information on this or is this just your guess?
-
a little info that shows you which option the server has would of course be nice. Nevertheless, it is possible to check in the helicopter which INS is set The first scene shows the Process without alignment in the second scene you can see how the button of the Precise alignment flashes immediately and after clicking on it again nothing else happens = this means the machine is fully aligned
- 1 reply
-
- 1
-
-
I know which pictures you are talking about, there are also some wing tests and it is not about whether the wing breaks off, because this is not necessarily the case if the main spar has hardly been damaged. The question is rather what effect do these huge "flesh wounds" have on the aerodynamic behavior? If 1-2 30mm hit a wing how much lift should the wing lose on a p47/p51 and so on.
-
Not only Aim54 but also Aim120 does this from time to time and further, the object is further above 50Knots and can therefore see it, so why not? you can also Lock vehicles with the A/A radar if they are driving fast enough
-
pm contrary public evidence Unrealistic radar and ecm function
Hobel replied to SNOPPY's topic in General Bugs
There are already some reports on the AGM-88 and its behavior, basically the AGM-88 goes active almost immediately after start in all modes, which can lead to discrepancies. https://forum.dcs.world/topic/327388-harm-in-pos-modes-goes-active-too-early-ruk-eom-and-pb/#comment-5234184 -
In reality, this is probably done by the ground crew in all cases, the pilots have better things to do than sit in the helicopter for 20 minutes and do nothing. The briefing is carried out beforehand and then they get into a helicopter that is on standby "ready to go" In dcs we have the problem that most server admins don't know what the INS in ka50 is all about and leave it on default... Even in missions we use "stored ins" because we only get into the machines after briefing. and waiting 20 minutes would be absurd. "Realism" to do something every time that the pilots probably rarely do themselves. Time is an important resource. I'm also a fan of being as realistic as possible, but waiting 20 minutes for an imaginary timer to expire is just absurd
-
With which airplane were the gbu38 dropped? it is very important to know that
-
Concerns about G-Onset and Damage to wings
Hobel replied to ElvisDaKang's topic in Bugs and Problems
Is this the right test method? 8.5 2024-01-02_19-20-09.mp4 8.7G break 2024-01-02_19-13-44.mp4 F5 Break .trk -
Concerns about G-Onset and Damage to wings
Hobel replied to ElvisDaKang's topic in Bugs and Problems
So rather observers of the thing I would emphasize the report here again, in which Flappie shows well where the problem comes from