Hobel

Aim9m has similar aerodynamics as the agm-122 and could also reach about 20nm without self-destruction. Energy would not be a problem.

can you upload a trackfile or video?

is it confirmed that the lifetime of the AGM-122 should be 60 seconds? if it is more than 60 seconds, what would be the limiting factor?

Track? Edit: yep zsu-57 is too strong.

After 10 years of dcs, I read this...

against the mentioned vehicles one should be enough, the armor is very thin on these vehicles left New

Why not, if the missle arrives at the target with mach 3 it still has enough energy. up to a maximum of 70-75nm are possible, the limiting factor is the battery of 100 seconds, if the aim120 had even more lifetime it could be fired even further. Tacview-20240320-144315-DCS.zip.acmi

The aim120 in dcs must be supplied with updates until it goes active and sees the target independently, this happens at 10nm. If the data supply is interrupted beforehand, the missle flies to the last known point, if you are lucky and the target has little or no maneuvering, the aim120 can see the target. However, there have also been bugs/exploits in the past, whereby the host aircraft continued to supply the missle with perfect data even when it was cold. F18, for example, could do this once.

I will look at the tracks later. But it should be said that the rwr warning is dynamic, which means that you can get a missle warning between 5-8nm, if you get the missle warning at 5nm and the missle is still very fast you hardly have time to react. Therefore, make your own timings and do not rely on the rwr warning. Otherwise Also fly high and fast and shoot as early as your radar allows against an f15. You can lock an f15 at 55-65nm. If you have a lock, shoot and dive down immediately.

azimuth has no effect on DBS1-2, this used to work but has been fixed. https://forum.dcs.world/topic/302912-strange-ground-radar-behaviour-while-zooming-in/

1.) DBS1-2 is already the "best" possible mode. Depending on the set range scale, the respective DBS has its fixed areas and dcs represents them quite accurately. therefore azimuth has no influence on DBS, which is correct This is shown in DCS as follows: DBS1 mode it is always One-fourth of the selected range. from 10 range scale you see a square of 2.5nm 20nm>5nm 40nm>10nm DBS2 is from 1nm to max ~7nm, depending on selected scale. It depends which mode you mean? there is already a report for EXP. What do you mean exactly? this is reported Context : A-G Radar is also possible in DCS, use the right Scale as well as good angles Look:

have you seen the video? this is the "new" logic

Yes, there are a few changes. There are also a few open reports. I'll look them up and post them here as well as the changes. Edit: So far the A/G radar seems to work, but the thing that makes it most difficult to use is the "snapback" of the cursor every time you put it down, the whole image is reset, which makes it almost impossible to use. good to see here once IRL and once DCS

when tgp is soi, "TMS right" should reset the maverick seeker.

Not with Lau-88 but with Lau-88A it should work.

Yes, but does this also apply to other aircraft that carry the 27ER?

Oh, that sounds good, doesn't it? So tws/soft lock shoots not quite so absurd with 27ER

Ok a question out of interest why don't you use the mouse to aim? Whether mouse or joystick. Both are not really realistic for the operation of such a weapon, why not use the hardware with which it is easier?

a question about the guidance of the 27ER, the search head only switches to "active" or sees the target from a certain distance, depending on the size of the target different range, about 10-20km. so LOAL and the missle is steered close to the target via radio link until then. hence my assumption, is it possible to fire the 27ER in TWS and the Radar only automatically switches to STT when the missle is in Seeker range. in the initial phase, an STT would not necessarily be necessary because the missle does not yet see the radiation anyway. As with Fox3 shots, the advantages would be that the target is warned late. The disadvantage of course is that the update rate is not quite as high in TWS

a little info that shows you which option the server has would of course be nice. Nevertheless, it is possible to check in the helicopter which INS is set The first scene shows the Process without alignment in the second scene you can see how the button of the Precise alignment flashes immediately and after clicking on it again nothing else happens = this means the machine is fully aligned

I know which pictures you are talking about, there are also some wing tests and it is not about whether the wing breaks off, because this is not necessarily the case if the main spar has hardly been damaged. The question is rather what effect do these huge "flesh wounds" have on the aerodynamic behavior? If 1-2 30mm hit a wing how much lift should the wing lose on a p47/p51 and so on.

and as already mentioned this option is already available and can be seen as preparation, the server admins just have to set it up

Not only Aim54 but also Aim120 does this from time to time and further, the object is further above 50Knots and can therefore see it, so why not? you can also Lock vehicles with the A/A radar if they are driving fast enough

There are already some reports on the AGM-88 and its behavior, basically the AGM-88 goes active almost immediately after start in all modes, which can lead to discrepancies. https://forum.dcs.world/topic/327388-harm-in-pos-modes-goes-active-too-early-ruk-eom-and-pb/#comment-5234184

You can check it by yourself.