Hobel

It used to be 80 seconds and was then adjusted to 100. maybe the Aim120C 5 has even more but who knows Now all Missles have a life limit. Perhaps irl other factors also play a role so that it is not always fixed at 100 seconds so that it fluctuates between ~-+10 seconds.

Watch on youtube how the Hellfire hits a jeep directly, the jeep is broken but almost all the people on it can still run away? yes I agree, I don't think the radar is intended for soldiers and if there is a vehicle next to it, that's the higher priority

Aim120C battery lifetime is 100 seconds. I have only looked at the Tacview here and there it is over 100 seconds 12nm before the impact, the Aim120 runs out of power EDIT: too slow

Would it be possible to switch MFD windows on and off with a hotkey? Razbam Module offers this to some extent, if it were also possible with Apache, the problem would be solved in this way, you would only have to switch off the MFD Window with a key command

It's been a while. So you would have to test it again, but in dcs it is currently like this. The missle can distinguish between tracks, wheels, stationary and moving vehicles. This means that if you shoot the missle at a tracked vehicle and there are only wheeled vehicles around it, the missle will most likely only hit the tracked vehicle because it probably recognizes the difference. And so on. However, if there are many other tracked vehicles around, the missle may not hit the initial target. If you watch the latest videos from Wags about the apache. There are short shots about the Apache FCR. There the targets are also subdivided between wheeled and tracked vehicles, so the FCR and therefore probably also the Lima seems to know these differences in dcs.

yes this should not be, or it is a MP recording and it could be due to the network that not a single hit was registered, if this is still in the SP you can make a report in the Hind area

at what distance did the WW2 airplanes take off and land from each other? there should also have been standards at that time so that the airplanes were not overturned by WT. Is it possible to take off and land in DCS according to these standards without much risk, yes or no?

ah it is reported. thx

I'm not so familiar with the F18, but wouldn't it be possible for the F18 to assign the contacts to a priority list? a hot target should be more interesting than a cold one and track it preferably or at least put it first in the listing. Currently it is sorted by range but the aspect does not matter It currently looks like this.

Yes, a few more questions. In a fast lvl flight with MW50, the automatic cooling is not able to cool the engine sufficiently and the engine sometimes breaks down immediately after 3 minutes. So -Does the automatic cooler need to be adjusted better? -Or is it correct that you have to adjust the cooling manually when using mw50. -Or does the engine overheat too quickly in dcs with MW5O that the automatic cooling cannot compensate for this?

And where do I classify our D9 engine? because it uses 1.9ATA, SL.

okay this is an interesting problem, theoretically it could be fixed if the mission builders change the start conditions for the KA-50III in the editor. You don't have access to it yourself? there is a selection for this in the mission editor @Flappie can you take a look at it.

oh nice, thanks for the feedback I was just about to have a look at the track now.

yes. as in the real KA-50, as already mentioned an excerpt from the manual was posted in the Russian forum

Same here, but I haven't flown with aim9x for a long time, maybe something has changed, the tests here are quite fresh.

No. Track?

Track?I had no problems switching modes with enable.

I just posted a video where 10 out of 10 vehicles were destroyed. The weapon works well and reliably against the type of target in dcs, very much so.

Basically agree. but 20 minutes is correct even in real life. not 40 minutes

So without lasers I was able to destroy 10 out of 10 BMP2s as far as i can see, the laser probably makes no difference Note:the Targeds were not the vehicles, only serve as scale

Thanks, the post is already much richer in detail. I will test the whole thing again in more detail and take your points into account. But what I see from your post seems to be the old bug that is back? I have not been able to observe this yet, will test when I get home.

Track? I could also destroy apc without problems from 25,000 feet and more cep was around 5m

I have tested it and the precision without laser is still more than sufficient for soft targets. so what's the problem here? unfortunately not comprehensible without a track

Ahh okay cool thanks.

looks good thx! But as an F15 beginner, I have a question about the TDC short and long. 4TWS>TDC Short = NARROW if I press TDC short in this scenario, however, this does not happen for me, nor does 3HDT TDC long for DTT. of course it is possible that I am misunderstanding or do something wrong