Foogle

Had this issue too, found that switching between the two modes without activating the centre position will cause them to fail, so my current workaround is to always press my centring button before switching to a dogfight mode.

It does say right there in your snip; "... initially in basic functions (Attitude hold) ...", seems like it's pretty clear what the basic mode is.

Now that the F1 has been released, I tested the F1EQ to see if it could fill the role of a tanker as it did during the Iran - Iraq War, the ability is missing. Please add both the pod, and the AI requirements to allow for the EQ to act as a tanker. Please do not dismiss this as a request for a player controlled tanker; this is a request for an AI model only. Thank you

Please offer a special option to automatically update the fuel amount when re-arming or re-fueling (Adding drop tanks & AAR) The fuel gauge takes a long time to set, and is frustrating to set correctly. RAZBAM offers an 'Automatic Detot' mode in the M-2000 to cover for this, so there is precedence for a easing of such systems in DCS currently. Thank you.

Mine worked without needing to change anything; it's currently using the Right_MFCD Viewport. If you need a special position you'll need to work out the files.

Deleted and rebuilt shaders to make sure it wasn't just an artefact. Huge white circle around sun blocks everything, looks like its projected onto the glass

As the title suggests, the EQ was used as an organic tanker during the Iran Iraq War, does the AI unit have this ability? Or is this a wish list item?

I see an early access discount, 63.99 instead of 79.99.

7 days to go!

Please check all press releases to avoid spreading misinformation; https://www.facebook.com/111390290648946/posts/pfbid02uYV1Sgg3fwRo6rBnie3eKjwoZt2Pnq4CMmRPmC4ZLoQeo3uzeUpHVaicjGXUqRZel/?sfnsn=mo

During the Iran Iraq War F1-EQs acted as organic tactical tankers, as this is an AI variant, will it receive the ability to act as a tanker? Even if the capability has to be broken out into it's own unit; the "(K)F1-EQ", the option would be greatly appreciated for both increasing realism and creating more options for mission designers.

I find the 3rd radio unnecessary, SRS let's you talk over the DL, so you already have a JF-17 only auxiliary channel, then use Comm 1 as your primary. So long as you follow the rule of 2 (No aircraft without a wingman in the same plane) you're fine. Getting into mixed aircraft flights is always a recipe for mismatch and disaster.

Gonna rain on the parade here: ED won't add 4x sidewinder carriage, even if it only requires a small change in code & matches most export users (and we have mission specific loadout restrictions, for this exact purpose); there's no way we're getting new radios and a refueling probe.

https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/ There are many user made skins downloadable from the link above. Can't find what you want? There are PSD templates in the main forum, so you can make your own! The responsibility of the dev is realistic skins, the community will fill in the gaps where needed. If you don't want to do it yourself, there are many skin artists who do both commissions and free work over on the DCS Livery discord https://discord.gg/6XauDj6W Have a great day.

There's a buy-in on attacking a defending ship, they take alot of missiles to overwhelm, and if timed incorrectly, will do nothing. I can't remember where is saw it but the US predicted that you would need to fire between 18 and 22 harpoons to land a single hit on the Kuznetsov. So the ante is quite high, more than a flight of aircraft can bring by themselves. Really, the correct call is to supplement the attack with coordinated sea and/or shore based anti-ship.

Larnaca parking spots 22, 23, 25, & 26 cause huge frame drops in SP <7fps, and kills my game in MP ~1 frame per 50-90 seconds. The log file is from multiple tests, the rest of the airfield seems fine, just those 4 spots. dcs.log

As Argentina is looking at the JF-17 to stand up their Airforce, it seems natural to use the Jeff as the Redfor jet in a modern Falklands conflict. This will be made even better when we get the Eurofighter, as 4 or 6 are currently stationed there for defense. I think the community will come up with more than a few real & fictional scenarios to make the map fun and useful.

If things aren't working properly; submit a bug report, it can be fixed if the Devs aren't aware of it. Most people don't use the terminal options, so I wouldn't be surprised if you're the first guy seeing it.

Which other players? Remember that the JF-17 is one of the better modelled aircraft, and stores limits are not on every plane. I. E. The 14, 16, & 18 can be flown to their max with a full load of weapons and fuel, with no adverse effects; because store limits aren't in the game for them. Hopefully that disparity is fixed by adding stores over-g to the others, but that's up to the Devs of each plane.

I know everyone wants the latest and greatest, but I think it's in a good position currently. I'd prefer if Deka could finish up the module: Small calibre LS-6s, CM-400, INS and Datalink targeting for the SD-10, the fuel flow and cruise pages/indicators, etc. Filling in the gaps and finalizing the module should be the main priority.

It initially worked, but I wasn't last time I landed on the LHA.

I actually textured both the PL-12 and PL-9 rails after I didn't hear anything back. I'm happy to donate them to the template, I'll message you on discord sometime this weekend.

I would be extremely careful citing any sources from India; they have a very odd social media war going on with Pakistan, which somehow became a pissing match between the HAL Tejas and the JF-17. Quick edit: Just to clarify: I'm not saying Pakistani sources are good either. Both sides seem to tie the aircraft to nationalism and ego, so there are significantly skewed viewpoints printed on both sides, to the detriment of any realism presented in DCS.

I can live without the CM-400, but is there any news on small calibre LS-6s?

Eventually it will come.