Ignition

I couldn't change it. It was fixed at 0/0 but that could mean its using the data from the DTC or avionic system as LJQCN101 said.

Being a WCMD I thought it would also compensate for the BLU-108. Its a shame because its very umpredictable with moderate wind to the point were its not reliable enough to employ. I had good success while launching them against the wind, at least the 2 launches I've tried this way. The "tgt wd" is really intriguing, maybe its the way to correct this.

I've been testing the CBU-105 and the BLU108 drift away of the target a lot (25kts of wind). Its supposed to do that? or it should also correct this. Reducing the BA reduces the drift but also the area of effect consiredably. I've noticed in the control sub-menu theres a "tgt wd" that its fixed at 0. I guess thats the target wind? cbu105cauc.trk

I find the agm-154A the most unreliable weapon. After the last patch they seem to drop more on target than before but they are really weak/unreliable. They do kill very VERY lightly armored stuff but you need to drop them in pairs to have an average result. I still need to test them against SAMs, specially the "low" RCS. I'm waiting for the CBU-105, I think this and the HARM will be the best weapons of the F-16C.

It was at ground altitude, I always put 0ft on the mission editor to be sure its at ground altitude, in this case 1611ft.

Theres a difference between a fighter pilot and a desktop pilot.

Now I tested in Caucasus and they all hit correctly, from different directions. Maybe Syria has some problems with alignment?

Tested again, it seems the AGM did compensate although too much this time. Tried several times and they ALL hit to the NW of the target in the same spot. jsow 2.trk Tried again and they don't hit the targets at all, tried against the wind and they all drifted a lot to the south.

If I shoot the AGM154 without wind it goes correctly to the target, If I put some wind with the same mission the BLU drift away of the target.

I tested with and without wind, the wind makes the BLU to drift a lot. Without wind they go to the target. I've tried to compensate the wind but its so difficult, its an useless weapon as of right now. So if I drop them upwind they go to the target? I didn't know. I will test it.

Well the F15E can carry way more than any other fighter, I can understand that If you need a rapid response.

Didn't change them, 2000ft and 5nm. I did more testings and its really hard to hit anything. It's not possible to modify those parameters in this version.

I've been testing the AGM-154A and its very inaccurate with some wind the BLU had 60m of drift. How can I compensate the drift of the wind? I guess I should take into consideration the time they take to fall and direction and speed of the wind, then I should use the meterstick to compensate? It looks like a lot of work, plus a correction of 60m on the TGP its very difficult specially at medium-long ranges. I also had this problem with the CBU-97 but the SFW are more effective.

I can't imagine the AF transporting armament with fighters.

10 97! wow thats a really big column

I mean, compared with some export versions.

I hope ED can manage to do the R7, we already have a pretty "crippled" version of the F16. I think we should since we have the left hardpoint, unless its only for the LANTIRN which I think this version doesn't use. I wonder how much time does it need to process the signals. I don't expect to have the precision and speed of the DCS phantasmagoria though.

Its really annoying without AG mode in JHMCS. For mavericks I usually use the HUD as SOI and then refine with the TGP but you need to fly towards the enemy in a very fast jet.

The blades should be very easy to find for a radar.

The development of the aircraft was delayed months (if not a year) but ED said they are focused now on developing the F16, next month we will get jsow and wcmd. Now I think we need to wait and see if this is true. ED is communicating, not much but they are saying what they are doing.

I did, but only gained a few nm, about 5nm. Its useful though but its not even close to what a jsow can do.

The problem is the USAF uses the F15E for strike missions, and we don't have it (yet) and it seems they use the F16 for a support role, in other countries it may be different. Not having a stand off bomb is really dissapointing for me since I like the F16 but in really complex scenarios as we (our community is around 25+ people) fly every week its necessary to have some stand off since we use combined arms also.

The 154A-1 its not a cluster bomb right? Its a 500lb penetrating bomb from what I understand. That would be a nice weapon.

The AGM65D its more useful than the TGP, I can't find anything with the TGP. Everything has the same color.

Between the F18, F16 and JF17, the F16 will be the less capable aircraft in terms of weapons, so why I would use the F16 when it has less options than the other two? I like the plane but I have more choices so I don't need to stick with one. Its not about how many weapons can shoot in one sortie, its about weapon options and the removal of the AGM154C romved one type of mission the airplane can make and it already had less mission options than the other two so its less capable.