Ignition

For me its much more unstable in yaw than the Ka-50.

I also never used it. I just fly the thing and trim as I need it.

Not only within F16, It's also intermittent with other datalink members like F18. Sometimes you can't see other members of the datalink flying very close to you, like 2nm. I don't know if it also happens with the F18. One problem may be the datalink of the F16 and F18 is very slow, it updates every 12 seconds which is a lot.

In the F10 map: -select units by drag and drop -indications of ROE (icon) -indications of radar status, on/off/destroyed (icons) -sound alarm and indication when a group finish its route -sound alarm and indication when a unit is shot -sound alarm when a unit detects an enemy -a window which shows aamo type and how much its left on each unit has on a group -always set movement speed at maximum (maybe in a special option in the main manu)

Agree, but the simulation in DCS stops at the aircrafts. When you start looking it as a game (because it is a game after all) the simulation starts to fall short. We have statics and vehicles that are soo old, 10s of years old and also there are very few ships. The AI is as old as those models and the pathfinding is terrible. When you see that in game all that amazing simulation goes away because you can't believe how stupid the AI is and when you destroy the same static a thousand times (because there're very few of them) through all these years the magic of DCS goes away. When you start doing your own missions you see clearly how stupid the AI is because you need to start over and over and over and over the mission because you need to "fight" the AI to do what you want it to do, needless to say you need to learn lua and scripting to greatly improve them. Yes playing with friends is amazing, new clouds are amazing, the graphics are very good and the simulation overall is excellent (It's probably the best of any game) but ED needs to take this into consideration. I almost have no desire to fly anymore, I will when the AH-64D releases but if ED doesn't change this it won't last longer.

I like DCS very much, but it plays exactly the same as 15 years ago. It didn't really change much in that aspect. The AI needs to be improved A LOT, ground AI more so. You're charging 40 dollars for combined arms and the AI has huge problems with pathfinding and the F10 map its really basic for combined arms.

A fix to path finding once and for all. 40 dollars is the price, com'on!

RCS is not modeled in DCS yet, its just a fixed number of clean aircraft right now.

Unrestricted satnav should be on by default. We play multiplayer a lot on both sides and it gave us a lot of problems.

The problem is with ED not you lol. ED decided to refund only who didn't use miles, I used 3 dollars in miles so I didn't get the 8,5 dollars refund. That money its not big deal, its just about fairness. I will get the same module at the same time as you.

Dont use miles for preorders. They can take your money and give it to someone else, that's what they did with the apache.

It didn't cause damage, ED used the miles spent to refund everyone who didn't use theirs. It was a trade. We basically gave our miles to other customers.

They used our miles to refund the people who didn't use them. LOL. This is worst than the delay.

Can I pay my 3500 miles to get the 8500 miles reimburse for the apache? LOL. This miles policy is nonsense.

From my experience, the boom operator in DCS is really slow and you need to be steady for a while for the DCS operator to conect the boom. It doesn't matter if you're perfectly in position if the aircraft is still moving relatively from the tanker. From the external view, I don't really know since I never watch myself or another aircraft tanking (all use the probe).

Option to save triggers to use them on other missions and maps. I know It could generate conflicts with naming of groups/zone triggers, maybe an indication could be shown so it can be fixed.

Where can I find all the different suite upgrades of the F-15E? including the one RAZBAM is modeling. I can't find any.

But the block Deka simulated doesn't have HMD.

F-15 and SA-15 gets really confusing.

Does the AN/ALQ-131 and 184 work in 360º or do they work in a cone? Also, how do these jammers compare vs the internal jammer of the F-18 or F-15? IMO its not so easy to implement the ECM even if they do a very simplified version. It needs to affect AI (ground and air) and it needs to affect other modules from different developers, which of course it depends on each developer.

There wasn't any mention of the jammer for the next update, only a wags video but no mention about it. They may be working on it. I hope ED unify the jammer effects across all modules so every aircraft can be affected by the ECM.

I was thinking the same.

The ARC 210 it's also missing from the F-16C, and for that aircraft it's important since it will give another UHF radio.

This is the new "quality" on daytime. That was at daytime with no fog. I don't know what they did but its really broken now.

He said it was a problem with the SPI not updating on a moving target. Nice finding. Did you try using the laser to see if it updates the SPI instead of slewing the TGP?