wilbur81

Yes...

This airframe is what drew me to Lomac in 2003. Well played.

Tholozor's method above is very similar to what I do (choose 'night', then adjust gain and contrast) and I get perfectly visible results... the only real bummer is that most of the maps don't display beyond the 10 nm scale yet.

Yeah, I'm kind of wishing I'd saved my $60 and waited for Iraq, but I'm considering that cash a donation to ED for the 1000s of hours of fun they've provided me over the past years after I've only purchased a minimal number of DLCs compared to many in the community. That said, anyone want to donate DCS: Iraq to me for Christmas? I'm sure Afghanistan will get the love soon...

Agreed.

I've copy-pasted the carrier templates with aircraft multiple times, over different maps (ie - Caucasus to Syria). Sometimes it takes a few seconds to paste. Additionally, try clicking the selection tool box on the left menu bar on the map you want to paste to before you ctr-v the carrier group.

Trying to understand the purpose of your screenshot here as you don't have any members displaying on the page at all...so, of course, no data.

HEAR, HEAR!!! I'm thankful for the core performance enhancements that have rendered the world more beautiful than ever and smooth as butter on my system. And remaining "Cloud-Free."

I'd say, per Nessuno's post above, that ED's only real 'problem' is that they're too ambitious. They get criticized with comparisons to FBMS, 3rd Party Module aircraft, etc... when they are taking on 25 times more work and complexity with full-fidelity, advanced (and immensely popular) airframes, maps, campaigns...etc. And then they have the core game itself. They will never win. I just hope they don't get discouraged. I for one just loaded up a rainy day mission on the Supercarrier in the Hornet, with Tomcats and other jets crowding the deck... and I had absolutely no frame drops or hiccups in 2D. A year ago, with the same mission and setup, my FPS would've dropped into the teens when looking at the deck Island, and that with even lower settings than I'm currently running. They just slowly get this sim better and better. But, yes...they are WAY too ambitious. And they are still the best overall air combat sim in town...bar none.

Precisely my point.

Mover: A higher-Viper-than-Hornet-hour driver: "I prefer the Viper..." Peachez: A higher-Hornet-than-Viper-hour driver: "I prefer the Hornet..."

Just WOW...

"Big-Engined" Legacy over the Super-Hornet in raw performance.... Be sure and listen all the way to 1:57:24.

2D or VR? What are your system specs? I play in full 4K (2D) and have better performance than ever in DCS MT... and that with an older CPU.

Absolute nonsense.

You're WAY too high... Fresnel lens system is completely out of view. Your velocity vector on the HUD has you touching down with nose wheel over the water in that screen.

Love everything about these questions, Winchester, and I'm curious about these elements as well.

The Dynamic Campaign...looks, well, very dynamic! LOTS of work I'm sure. Keep up the good work! It's going to be a remarkable achievement when complete, I'm confident.

Agreed on all points.

Yes, updates ago.

Are you talking about A/C placement or that nice 'wet-deck' surface effect?

Hey, Wags and ED Team: Late to the party here, but loving the update so far! Great stuff on the small part of Afghanistan that has been released so far as well. And my word! LOVING the new rain effect on final approach!

Toto, are you saying that the latest update introduced the haze or have you noticed this for some time?