Jump to content

213

Members
  • Posts

    617
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by 213

  1. 213

    Game Engines!

    no normal maps=not advanced. sorry
  2. nightvision vision isn't supposed to be round.
  3. 213

    Game Engines!

    from what i can tell, it's adept at rendering natural environment, but when it comes to man-made formations... this is supposed to be la harbor:
  4. in other words super limited at this point. oh and enjoy playing lan with 4 other guys. this isn't going to be possible in a normal multiplay environment. lmao at how the terrain mesh doesn't even match. infantry? enjoy guys buried 5 feet under the ground.
  5. if only ed would learn the importance of normal mapped terrain ;)
  6. then you discovered they were friendlies. mission fail.
  7. 213

    ArmA III

    future soldier crap. meh
  8. why wait? buy steel armor:blaze of war
  9. by placing credit card back into wallet just like a-10, dcs flying legends and nevada. still waiting for a worthy supplement to black shark 2
  10. really bad, sorry. first rule, always keep realism.
  11. so grossly complicated that the ai can't even properly enter a building. not really. i've modded for the game. the performance comes from the most abject laziness on the part of the artists. you should really see the unnecessary details they put into the models. it's comical.
  12. 213

    immersion

    also, coffee breaks, and going to the bathroom. no. and the other suggestions are equally unnecessary. this isn't a racing game.
  13. the one of the left still needs optimization. use the high poly one to generate a normal map.
  14. that would have been more clever and honest without the tautology. a computer within a computer was enough. the addition of "game" was superfluous. also, it's not that other computers besides the players' is modeled. the other aircraft operations do not function like the players'
  15. protip: when someone says that kind of thing, they should follow up with an explanation as to why.
  16. do you understand what bsod is? if so, there's no excuse for not understanding what fostiken meant. if not, your question should have been "what's bsod?"
  17. why? if the option is available in the options, use that. "it would be neat" isn't a good reason.
  18. a bunch of people already know how to implement things like buildings, vehicles, soldiers, etc. make a thread with pictures of your work, then request for conversion and they might be able to contact you and ask for the model. my hypotheses is that they want to make sure it's "legal" for the game. and also that they're using newly developed methods and tools that are not available yet.
  19. it's only useful against poorly trained troops using cold war era equipment. being that the terrorists/insurgents of today are even less advanced than the eastern bloc soldiers of the 70s/80s for which the a-10 was originally designed, there's really no need to continue upgrading it. modern updates like the litening pod are really just convenient adaptations.
  20. not only is this impractical, and impossible at this point, it's possibly not desirable. none of you know how this system really functions. you're just making assumptions. the likelihood of this having entertainment/commercial value is unknown. a better idea would be to improve the game itself and incorporate viable features of other games so you don't have to "link" it to other games.
  21. no. it's not going to happen. and it has no commercial uses.
  22. looks awful and makes me feel sick, but i suppose that's the desired effect.
  23. i think people like to claim they'll give up a finger for ed, but in reality, they won't donate a cent. that community is probably very large and coherent, that's why they could get so much in a day. i personally think it's silly paying for something that hasn't been created yet.
  24. true. and honestly, college education is somewhat of a joke these days. you can literally get the same information from wikipedia.
×
×
  • Create New...