Raven (Elysian Angel)

Yes that annoyed me too: now there's a (relatively) huge black square in the sky whereas normally there would be a faint actual aircraft visible...

null

Depends on which VR headset you use: Varjo has it baked into their own software

Yes but also no: RaDaR = Radio Detection and Ranging

Yes very impressive patch notes! Jordan air bases are good news for the Mirage F1 too

In order to prepare for the update, no doubt!

Sure but let's leave the politics at the door. I don't think the average user wants different ethnicities in their pilot models, but female models (any ethnicity) is definitely something that would be great to have (HeatBlur already briefly showed us theirs for the F-4E) along with female voice-overs for contacting ATC/wingmen. In fact, years ago I started a thread asking for that very thing.

Autopilot/guidance too, isn't it? Combined with a properly modelled radar that should hopefully fix a lot of frustrations people have with it.

Hopefully the R-27 will be properly modelled by the time we get the full-fidelity MiG-29

Ah nice to hear about the FF support for the Chinook!

That’s because the module hasn’t been released yet. Perhaps we’ll get an EA announcement towards the end of the year.

Wish list: - pilot and rio sun visor

Yes? I replied to the question if there are any other upcoming modules for MSFS... [quote]Would you please expand a bit on MSFS plans? So far, we have F-14. Are there plans for other modules or updates to MSFS Tomcat?[/quote]

HB already announced an F-16A.

Well, honouring this request is the very definition of lowering HB standards The tail hook is not designed for it, the landing gear is not designed for it. The type of tyres is wrong for this purpose and have the wrong pressure, the aircraft’s structure is not designed for it, … So at the very least allowing the F-4E to safely operate from a carrier reduces the damage model to arcade level. What will be the consequences of that for everyone else? *edit* Also, how do you expect the Supercarrier LSO AI to deal with an F-4E in the groove? Not even the F-14 is properly supported…

I thought DCS aimed to be the most realistic consumer-level military flight sim possible? If this gets added as a mod, so be it. But dedicating time and effort into this request as the official developer, while already packed with work (and behind self-imposed schedule on a lot of promised features), is in my humble opinion not the right thing to do. There’s something to be said for giving the customers what they want, but please be reasonable…

You too!

Yes of course but that doesn’t explain why in certain cases even FC3 is more complete than recent full-fidelity modules - such as the ability to directly command Wingman 4. Other differences regarding communication have already been pointed out in this thread (ordering a wingman to scout ahead etc).

Or we could ask these guys:

Thanks for the clarification!

Next patch there will be:

That’s brilliant, cheers!

I think the issue is that DCS-level options such as “loud afterburner” and “switch volume” don’t work for Heatblur modules. It likely has to do with the fact that HB pioneered those sounds within DCS, but I for one asked several times already for HB to connect their modules to those sound sliders - to no avail yet apparently I even made a general wish list post for more sound level consistency between the various DCS modules, but it seems lately things only got worse instead of better (case in point: the OH-58)…