Jump to content

Pasquale1986

Members
  • Posts

    487
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Pasquale1986

  1. That looks super sexy!!1!!!11!!!! But, first question is, when the cockpit overhaul will happen - KA-50 is delayed to 2019. Second question is, if the won't optimize the tint with overhaul anyway - as they did with the Hornet HUD. So maybe the owner of the MOD wants to share it rather sooner than later :music_whistling: It think many of us would highly appreciate it :pilotfly:
  2. Funny thing is, for me there is no buy button when a product is required, that i don't own - just checked it. Instead of the buy button i have a hint "Requires another product". Since i own NTTR i have a buy button for the Red Flag Campaign.
  3. Lol that would be regarded as a fail then. For me it shows a buy butten
  4. Hahahahaha amazing!:megalol: You can't buy it because you don't own the neccessary well hated desert to use it The shop prevents you from buying stuff you can't use because neccessary modules - e.g. certain hated deserts - are not owned by the customer. Cheers
  5. 1. ATC 2. Weather and Lighting System 3. AI 4. Comms Imho we need the General Aviation stuff fixed first. This will give us a believable World and should be the solid foundation of any other work - because let's be honest the modules are just amazing even with bugs. If this is set, we can improve Performance and then move to specific combat related issues as the FLIR or SAM-Systems or Missile guidance etc. Just my 2 Cents
  6. :megalol: that would be a knuckleball...from a power pitcher...after 4 consecutive high 90's heat :megalol:
  7. Exactly!! And for me i tend to always come back to the hog and it always get's good flying hours every month because it's just a hell lot of fun to fly despite it's not my primary module at the moment. Imho the best software-entertainment investement i ever made. Regarding the cockpit textures: as it was said,the upgrade will come - till then i can highly recommend to use this user made texture update in the meantime: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?t=216257 easy to install Version: https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3302026/ Get yourself a Hog and have fun mate Cheers
  8. Ah i see - thanks for the spot on info lithion. So it’s not a license issue but suite-version limitation. That makes sence - thx mate
  9. Absolutely :thumbup: I will stay away from those TF-30 and fly the F-14B anyway
  10. This is not correct: the F-16 will have a very hard time if it enters a low speed turn fight the Tomcat and thats what i meant: The Tomcat has certain flight regimes where it will be superior to the Jets you mentioned. As i said there if you are able to fly the jet to it’s strength and exploit weaknesses of the adversary you will have no issues beating any of those aircrafts mentioned by you constantly. If the Viper Driver stays in the vertical, keeps his energy high - his strength - and doesn’t join the turning fun - his weakness at low speed v. a F-14 - well…different story. But e.g. the tomcat - same goes for the hornet - has better nose authority than the F-16 and the F-15 iirc
  11. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3673331&postcount=1379
  12. Nice Puking Dogs seem to be ready for EA-Release :D
  13. There already is a thread with a very vivid discussion regarding the Hands off-flying ability of the Kurfürst in this thread: https://forums.eagle.ru/showthread.php?p=3345222#post3345222 As i already stated there for me works +2 nose down trim at 3000m MSL and around 420kph IAS as cruise settings without much input needed
  14. Thx for the clarification Snoopy, do you know if this is just a different designation or a completely different model of the AGM-65?
  15. That's awesome :thumbup: It will imho absolutely add to the immersion!!
  16. This! It's not like a Rhino will be better in all situations in a BVR and WVR fight - or as it was stated "across the board" - than any aircraft developed in the 70's that's just wrong. Even more so, when we talk about dogfighting. The F-16A is e.g. regarded as a better pure dogfighter than the later C. There is a huge discussion going on for years, if the F-35 will be able to perform as good as the F-22 in WVR fights. The Tomcat will be able to dogfight everything we have in DCS if the pilot knows what he is doing and is playing the bird to it's strength. What should be rembered is, that a WVR-fight and dogfighting in particular hugely depends on the pilot abilities. If you get a Hornet to bleed all it's energy in the initial turn while the Turkey goes vertical, the Hornet will have a hard time regaining that energy and the Turkey Driver will have an distinct advantage. The other way around you would want to drag an F- 15 in a slow speed turning fight. IIRC the Eagle has an inferior turn rate at slow Speeds and your F-14 will have superior nose authority. If the Eagle Driver keeps his energy and speed up, you've got a Problem. In conclusion there is no this plane is better than this plane in WVR. What is to be considered on the other Hand are off-boresight launching capabilites of some planes e.g. the Mig-29/Su-27/33 and the Hornet
  17. We know from Chizh that the KA-50 will be updated in 2019, but is there any word, when they plan to do the upgrade on the Hog?
  18. Yeah, my suspicion as well. That's why i formulated a deliberate question, but you never know
  19. Perhaps we can get a hint from the dev‘s if the incorporation of the LMAV for the F/A-18C has changed something in the case of the Hog
  20. Under this circumstances why not think big, think Gripen A-model
  21. Normally you would fly formation with the tanker on its left wing before you would rejoin. If you are able to fly in formation with the tanker you know its speed. Since AAR is basically in huge parts formation flying it's even good practise for AAR to fly in formation with the tanker a little bit longer until your are sure about its speed.
  22. Develop the F/A-18C A2A capabilities and then make the Eagle ASM, would be the easiest solution
  23. It's a little bit to old for the heatblur plane set that span's 80' to mid/late 90's with the Viggen, the A-6E and the F-14A and B with Lantirn. I would hope, that HB is developing modules that fit and complement the existing modules and assets of this set timeframe (go Nighthawk :D)
  24. yup, you can fire multiple lmavs at a single target - jtac will lase til target is destroyed - tried that on the weekend because there was a cloud in the flightpath of lmav no. 1 :doh:. But you need to uncage the seekerhead of the second mav and let that one lock on to the lased target as well before you pickle
×
×
  • Create New...