Pasquale1986

Yes, it is and it will be a s**t load of fun

Absolutely :thumbup:

Yup, but there is a lot animated, that is completely unneccessary for FC3

I would really love to see the D but i would happily buy the B+ Upgrade

Exactly that's why i suggested a look into the Nighthawk in a bright and perhaps not to distant future

This is pure speculation and might be super dumb as i use a TM Warthog Throttle, but i would assume this is related to ever so slightly asymmetric thrust. Aren't both engines modeled with a slight Variation between them?

@SilentWarrior: I think it can be expected, that the head positioning and the scale of the cockpit will be corrected for VR with the incoming cockpit update for the Hog to current standards. @NineLine: Do you have any idea when to expect some news on this?

Everything is animated in there that looks more like a cockpit for ASM

Yeah I had that one off the Books already as i don't think they will not do it, just forgot to Mention it - btw. i love the A-6E as well

35sec:

Yup! First of all, it's one of the most if not the most iconic A/C (with the Tornado) that is not in development right with the Viper, Phantom, Tomcat, Hornet and Strike Eagle all actively pursuit. Second, every pure bomber is limited in it's operational role, but that doesn't mean flying it would be boring and further more it doesn't mean it's easy or boring to operate it. You'll have enough to do to fly the Goblin precisely according to flight plan, acquire your target and stay within the parameters for a succesfull drop and egress.

Maybe someday they’ll take a look at this little bird

Exactly, IIRC Wags more or less said in some of the recent streams that they will miss RL performance on porpuse - something like we model as close as we are comfortable - due to legal restriction

Yeah but this: https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=3671384&postcount=378

Nice sight seeing flight on the NTTR map while drinking some beer and going through the procedures, ending with buzzing Nellis Tower with full burners on

Booooh

My Jug says you’re welcome to join the fun

+100 (€)

+1

+100 And to add to this: …to use the plane correctly What is often forgotten, ist the fact, that the 29 was designed as a short range intercepter with heavy reliance on GCI guidance. The Radar was meant to be a weapon employment device and not a search radar as e.g. in the F-15C. This role - air superiority - was by design meant for the SU-27.

Question is if performance differences for the radar of the 9.12 and the 9.13S are modelled at all

Question is, how much the oscillations are caused by our controller setup. I use the virpil mongoose t-50 with 17,5cm extension and don’t experience strange oscillating movements even without curvature set on the y-axis. With my TM Warthog grip without extensions on the other hand…she’s a little touchy to say at least. Controller setup plays a huge role here

Amazing, thanks for your effort CHSubZero! Will be downloaded and put into action as soon as I get home from work - this is highly appreciated

This is not necessarily a matter of added functionality - see Su-25T - nor is it a matter of added animation. As shown in the demo model viewer, the animation is already done it just has to enabled and the module is in EA state AFAIK