Raviar

May be we can hear good news Nov ! maybe !

I dont think so, its just matter of resource, cost and benefits, ED has 3rd parties who already delivered some terrains ! its not easy to redo the work even if the ground aspect in Engine get ready ! will take time, while we are waiting for very basic features of 2018 released hornet ! so ... I believe it might be achievable by 5 to 10 years from now !

"In its most accurate mode, the JDAM system will provide a weapon circular error probable of 5 meters or less during free flight when GPS data is available" https://www.minot.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/264282/joint-direct-attack-munitions-gbu-313238/ https://www.minot.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/264282/joint-direct-attack-munitions-gbu-313238/

Thats What I want in DCS, its not about FPS, there are Squad, ARMA .. BUT the DCS needs Infantry, the supply and Heli supply, parachuters, Air assault, CAS and .. will be meaning full compare to the current state I wish DCS Engine/Terrain get to that level by 2025 ~ 2030 Thats not just bring selling point to the Simers and Gamers but DCS become the most serious competitors to the game I just mentioned, I wish to load infantry to UH-1 or provide CAS for the player in AH-1 AH-64 A-10 ...

Heavy! 1st you are talking about specific varient and type of AIM-9 and the most advacned one which is 9X! 2nd regular Flare suppose to do that! I compared R-60! not even M https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/news/a27094/su-22-dodge-aim-9x-sidewinder/ If the Su-22 Flare can confuse the AIM-9X! same flares should confuse 9J/P5/9M/R-60/R-60M/R-73 !

Nerfing! This is not FPS Game! this suppose to be SIMULATOR ! we dont care if you get killed on MP million times in a row!

Damn, dont tell me its true, it will really hurts! would be curious what can be wrong in other modules !

I have the same issue This topic needs way more attention @BIGNEWY please help us

I found the issue and it was not XMP or Over Clocking but it was "Asus GPU Tweak" II and III both were causing crash and freeze only in DCS, but that was the cause, was flying the last two weeks without single crash after stopped using this software Thanks @Flappie

You can post it in Bug section if you think its a bug, but before you posting there you will need to provide track file, which you can save it if you are in SP(single player) and it will be automatically saved if you are in MP (Multi Player)

Everything from the team perspective is right, otherwise we wouldnt get this! but the question is if the team is right?! base on many and many real pilot from F-5, F-14 and F-16 the trim is not as perfect as it should be, example, the F-5 is once of the most stable flying Air craft without constant pitch trim, one you trim it it will hold, BUT in DCS is totally different story or for example if I need minor right trim in F-16, I will do two times click trim to the left and three times trim to the right! instead of 1 trim to the right and the results r different ! I believe generally the trim is not as correct as it should be

as a person who Entered to DCS because of F-5 on 2016, I would say NO with capital however it would be nice to have it as a Mod not a replacing the current F-5, the original F-5E even doesnt have the EWR ! people want two radio, AAR Probe, digitalize HUD, CCIP ! Mod would be perfect

make sure to select a WP, the WP seq can be seq1 to seq3, make sure you are in a right sequence with WP selected

1st, the Flare and Aerobrake is not what Tomcat suppose to do, due to reducing cost of maintenance IRIAF do it. it not standard, I knew that but I wanted to do achieve it, seems the HB Tomcat it is not really capable of doing that smoothly like you can see in many videos, however here is what I am doing for aerobraking for people who are interested: 1. 15 degree AOA approach 2. DLC OFF 3. VVI below 500fpm 4. smooth touch down, and a little bit of pitch to keep the nose up

actually it is annoying, and the search doesnt function properly! ED really needs to do something about Tags, Filter and Search, it looks spamming, and many brilliant content get lost in-between thousands of junk

this is funny! you wana go fast because you can, nope

the F-117 is an AI, I saw this picture before and as you know it is generated base on DCS which is not correct, the RCS of the F-5 from 50s cant be as same as F-16 Block 50! that the my point , I dont think if the chaff cartridges are the same as well! To me, the focus of the ED is all about A/A and Active Missile, as we can see the improvement of AIM-120C-5 over 4 years! but how about these core important details !

Thanks for reply, that was my mistake, i had to put it in general, it was more of a question

I ran multiple test in Tiger, Viper and Hornet against multiple SAMs and Missile, However seems the flare is not effective at all, while preamptive flares are effective, the flare is not much effective once missile is tracking , the attached TacView shows R-60 can get kill while the blue is moving against the sun direction while the trottle is ilde and releasing as much as flare as possible On the other hand the A-10 can easily dogde the missile by flaring, the size and the amount of flare and heat signature is matter, no doubt on it, BUT my guess is the whole DCS logic and architecture is kind of base on A-10, the missiles, logics ... didnt recieve enough update while ED continusely is launching new modules! however I might 100% wong ! The topic is not the skills and how to dodge, I know I need to dive towards the ground with high G manuver, but my concerns are Flare in DCS vs real life as most of you probably know the 9X deafted by the flare! (please dont give me the flare size/type thing) https://www.popularmechanics.com/military/aviation/news/a27094/su-22-dodge-aim-9x-sidewinder/ Tacview-20220907-173131-DCS.zip.acmi Tacview-20220907-172615-DCS.zip.acmi Tacview-20220907-172505-DCS.zip.acmi Tacview-20220907-174340-DCS.zip.acmi Tacview-20220907-174302-DCS.zip.acmi Tacview-20220907-174340-DCS.zip.acmi Tacview-20220907-174302-DCS.zip.acmi

I dont see much a diffrence of Detecting, locking and firing of SA-2 against Tiger, Viper and Hornet Tacview-20220907-170302-DCS.zip.acmi Tacview-20220907-165846-DCS.zip.acmi Tacview-20220907-165406-DCS.zip.acmi

This is still an issue, the Ripple interval doesnt work at all

Thanks @Flappie, Ran the memory test, no error, took about 3 hours I disabled all the Mods now, I will upload the Logs again if crashed

Negative, I will try it now

Its happening again and not just in F-5 but in almost any AC (Viggen, F-5, F-16, F-14 so far), randomly (mostly after splashing or hiting a target in close distance) and its not only in MP but Single Player TOO, it is crashing more than 7 times a day in the last two days, and its worth actually, the Whole system Freeze, no response at all, and I have to Hard Reset the system 1. the XMP is OFF, the BIOS is in default 2. there is not any overclocking 3. running in 64GB, the 64GB set as VRam on SSD 4. TdrLevel with value "0" set in registry 5. the windows and all drivers are updated 6. I did reinstall the MotherBoard Chipset and VGA and NVidia 7. Ran both commands 1: sfc /scannow 2: DISM /Online /Cleanup-image /Restorehealth 8. Disk Cleanup Performed 9. Check Disk Permored 10. Perormed DCS Repain in Slow mode with Extra Files Check 11. All FXO and Metashadres on SaveData AND Terrain deleted 12. any DCS... Folder in C:\Users\<UserName>\AppData\Local\Temp already deleted 13. Deframentation performed 14. Monitored the CPU and GPU Temp with MSI AfterBurner, CPU is always below 60 Degree, and GPU is always Below 80 Degree (mostly about 65 to 73) 15. Power Plan is already set to "Ultimate" 16. Shadow Replay Disabled 17. I am loosing my mind! dcs.log dcs.log.old

is the AI really Scan the Area and Air inorder to find hostile AC or it coded as it already knows where to look at ?