Jump to content

Raviar

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    599

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Raviar

  1. Raviar
    I did, it should work out of the box, I tested in SimAppPro and it works, but it doesnt work in DCS ! I am not loading any cloud profile and assign everything by my self in DCS not simApp
  2. Raviar
    as per title i have no idea how to make the Vibrator work in DCS
  3. Raviar
    In HB we Trust. The phantom is in the right hands
  4. Raviar
    Same issue
  5. Raviar
    Mirage 2000, and thats because I gave up relearning it as changed couple of times! Spitfire, just because I didnt lick cockpit (such a shame, I know, its legendary bird) L-39, I dont fly with it at all Mi-24, waiting for Afghanistan But I didn't buy to only fly but because I like these birds and I like to support ED
  6. Raviar
    would be nice to move throttle to idle or off position by mouse left & right click, like tomcat
  7. Raviar
    Would be happy to help Thanks again for all the efforts
  8. Raviar
    Thanks for the campaign, I flew the 1st mission and I found an issue, checked the mission and seems the TACAN is not set for Texaco 1-1 on 53X apart from that, I have few feedback: 1. I believe the fog in weather is not realistic for region (the fog is not well implemented in DCS at al in my opinion) 2. the pilot's accent of MiG-29 is russian just for the sake of immersion (I can help on that if you need) 3. the IRGC commander has nothing to do with IRIAF, the COMM and conversation could have been better Thanks
  9. Raviar
    as Pig and Tomcat have systems in common, can it be the next HB project ?
  10. Raviar
    almost 1 month left just saying
  11. Raviar
    meanwhile you can define a Zone and use triggers to remove all objects in the zone, so put it in the very tiny small zone and remove it, I dont think they will anything before releasing of Normandy2
  12. Raviar
    for me it is E and D by far
  13. Raviar
    Love your work, I am heavily using this mod, great work, well done
  14. Raviar
    I cant agree more, no doubt, I have this map since day 1, I am very agree with the last sentence, but what can we do except not to buy the Normandy2(their support is same in Normandy1), seems the prioritization of the dev team is not what we(as client) expect (i dont want judge them but to me they are very unprofessional considering I myself developer for over 15 years!), I wonder how SLA works with ED! I assume this so I can deal with situation, because I need all my IFR/VFR Charts/kneeboards as well
  15. Raviar
    because BigNewy clearly mentioned there is per-requisite development prior to fix the issue, and the current priority is Normandy 2, so I think they will be back to Syria development after Normandy2, and it should be after that "per-requisite" issue/feature development on Syria, so I guess that wouldn't happen anytime soon no matter how we eager to get it fix or write in this thread
  16. Raviar
    it would not be until few months after Normandy 2 I guess
  17. Raviar
    we need danish translator what is he explaining, very interesting video
  18. Raviar
    I know mate, 1st the mode is in SIM, which either is practice or is not real DGFT, 2nd the video footages look fake as Simulator
  19. Raviar
    i doubt it get published by official authorities, even though that would not be consider as reliable, not everything get published or told by officials (especially a country like turkey) can be consider as reliable called "appeal of authority fallacy" Check the HUD you will realize the master arm is in "SIM" mode and the video undergone heavy visual effects modification
  20. Raviar
    you realize its another sim ! right !
  21. Raviar
    My bad, my apologies, I had to stick to plain english while Im writing in forum, Gate could be even training gate in DCS and probably many other things which you are dealing with, thanks
  22. Raviar
    @Flappie The AI is on full Afterburner but the speed of the AI's AC doesnt change regardless of changes in throttle either MIL or Gate
  23. Raviar
    the air space separation is usually above 1000 ft if im not mistaken, and it should be a little bit smarter AI to calculate the ceiling and the floor of the thick cloud and find the closest, either climb or decent, either way should not be traffic in given airspace, the airspace can be calculated in radios and the value of radios can be the value of predefined race track or some predefined value in ME, there can be a algorithm to figure out to avoid separation or even the separation of the stack should be calculated by AI, then they have to be pushed either up or down if not possible to de-conflict the one which is going to fly through the thick cloud then we need both options, above and below
  24. Raviar
    it could be optional as a command or a check box, you dont want it, you dont add it! if there is an issue with "We already have too many instances where AI doesn't do what you want" that call BUG/Defect/Issue! which CAN be resolve . The weather can be Dynamic, Cloud are moving and I am trying to INJECT real weather to the mission, SO: No, I DO NOT KNOW
  25. Raviar
    It would be nice if AI can override given alt and fly above tick clouds if given access in ME
×
×
  • Create New...