Raviar

the project failed, they have tried different launches with different parameters, at the end launch was success but the guidance was failure and project failed the R-27 was total failure due to couple of reasons There is not any evidence, of the shot, Although they carried and shot for test which failed couple of times, either the missile drop like stone, or failed in guidance, not to mention the missile has huge aerodynamic difference and heavier

The project failed on both launching HAWK missile and R-27

hopefully It would fix the issue which break the wing in dive while pulling only 7Gs!

is there possibility to add more AC type, such as Hornet and Warthog ?

Is there anyway we can help on this inorder for you to make the damage model ?

IS THIS DCS ?!

I love the idea, as we are getting close and close to Phantom, MiG-23 and F1 release, I think this part if the most needed map (ofcourse Vietnam, Korea and Balkan is much more important but I dont think we can get this, although static objecs by ED and Urga can be reuse in this part and it is same objects on Persian Gulf) I dont think Syria will get any further more expansion by Urga, the Persian Gulf map either (as it suppose to be straight or hurmoz initially), even the Shiraz (not the wine, although the famous shiraz wine grape is back to the same city thats the reason the name is shiraz wine), Lar and Kerman are not really implemented with nice details, the ground in the middle of iran is terribly modeled (texture wise) If Ugra or ED can make another map which can cover the most or All of the Iraq, Kuwait and West part of Iran, it would be great, the most important AFBs are not included in the Persian Gulf map such as: Bushehr(Home of F-4D and RF-4), Hamedan(F-4), Dezfoul(home of F-5), Omidieh(F-5) and Possibly Isfahan which is in the middle of iran, about 80nmi to the north of Shiraz(the home of Tomcats) and Possibly Tabriz on North West(F-5, F-4 and MiG-29) BTW the west part and North West of Iran is not all desert at all, its all mountains with lots of Snow in winter time and some green parts too Dont expect green as Balkan or EU, but its not all desert, if you take a look at it by google map, dont use top view only, find a places and try to check the pictures if there is any, it would be something like this: https://www.google.com/maps/place/Sumar,+Kermanshah+Province,+Iran/@33.9045023,45.9440943,3a,75y,51.2h,90.7t/data=!3m8!1e1!3m6!1sAF1QipM2WzLwBkXCMgaxlgYVHH8xBQvpjdj1_I2GmBcT!2e10!3e11!6shttps:%2F%2Flh5.googleusercontent.com%2Fp%2FAF1QipM2WzLwBkXCMgaxlgYVHH8xBQvpjdj1_I2GmBcT%3Dw86-h86-k-no-pi-20-ya258-ro0-fo100!7i10240!8i5120!4m8!1m2!2m1!1smap!3m4!1s0x3ffc55846696acdd:0xd44500dd0339e47d!8m2!3d33.8859856!4d45.6393957

Woops, now we will see Hind dominate the sky is that for real ? Hind is super powerful compare to other helicopter in ColdWar server already, giving R-60M would be really a challenge for bluefor

I wonder if they even care! not a single reply from developers! nice! after two years! seems its going to be kinda culture!

make sure to open all related ports with their corresponding protocols on FW https://www.serveracademy.com/how-to-host-a-dcs-server-full-step-by-step-guide/

Thats F-5A as @twistkin mentioned.

I think they open both TCP and UTP port and some didnt open UTP, which they should

that was hilarious reply specially on "It would be unrealistic" same goes to the CBU height config! and Mark series Bomb fuse and delay , really like to get details realism on bomb fuse setting

Thats right, I was wrong, there is not such config on F=5E/F manual null

ofcourse but not 6, the 6x82 can be carry out on outer pylons too in A/B , not really sure about E

bug by RWS, SAM or DTT, switch to TWS, you will not need to tilt antenna in crank or change elevation on dive/crank .. very useful

I am not sure if its a bug or ED needs to add it, however the A-10C and A-10CII dont have special tab on adv setting like any other clickable module inorder to modify the default radio freq

never fly like Top Gun Maverick, you will be dead, specially with ta poor choice of weapons ! but fly like @104th_Maverick

there are already 3 packs for Thunderbirds, check the userfiles

I do expect ED can do way better job on AWACS call and bandit calls, i do expect to get something like https://gitlab.com/overlordbot/srs-bot out of the box, however lets reduce expectation way lower than this at least AWACS should be a little more smart enough to give BRAA to closest bandits and be able to priories the bandits base on Range, closure rate and aspect, When I am going to get merge with hostile in transonic at 10 nmi, maybe I dont expect AWACS ignore that and give me info about enemy AWACS orbiting at angles 30 with distancer of 80nmi !

as per title, the ground unit (In my test T-90 and T-72B) start engaging with AC

is there any plan for MER 6 pod in order to carry 6 MK-82 ?

This thread needs way more attentions, most of DCS Jet modules are 60s/70s/80s and 90s, we need same era SAMs and air defenses