Jump to content

Airhunter

Members
  • Posts

    1817
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Airhunter

  1. That's how it should be. The first variant 73's were 45° lock and 75° track after launch. From the early 2000's the RuAf has received an upgraded variant capable of 60° off bore and 75° tracking after launch. There is no different designation officially, it is still being referred to as the R-73 by both the aircraft avionics and personel. We have the first (early) variant in DCS. A 90° variant is still in early prototype/R&D stages and is not fielded operationally as of today in any airforce.
  2. That is pretty cool indeed.
  3. +1
  4. New AB visuals are still pending. No info though as of when they'll be shipped.
  5. A B(U) with the PTID, Sparrowhawk and JDAM's could indeed be an interesting idea.
  6. +1 A workaround would be locking the target with PAL.
  7. I've recently been messing around with my binds and came to the conclusion that having two keybinds to cycle through the Jester AI menu (clockwise or anti-clockwise per respective button press) would be super handy. Is it possible to add such binds in the foreseable future?
  8. Just like the R-27 family then. :lol:
  9. Does it need to be on?
  10. I noticed they added a "tomcat ball" binding to the keybindings, maybe that'll come sooner or later.
  11. Basically, if I tell Jester to drop the tanks (WVR radar -> drop external fueltanks) he says "can't do that" or "unable".
  12. Yep, they are beyond broken.
  13. Don't wanna be asking constantly but any news on the RC2 patch? Namely the much needes fixes to the pilot model, the new sounds and the external PBR overhaul?
  14. Thanks for clearing that up!
  15. I enjoyed reading this. Nice.
  16. Seems it's fixed for the next update? https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/news/changelog/openbeta/2.5.6.49718/
  17. Considering ED has been messing with the AMRAAM for over a year now and it's now worse than ever in CCM and has still pretty questionable guidence this is barely a good thing. There is no difinitive state for the amraam it seems. Weren't we supposed to have a new missile API and "improved" amraam by the beginning of this year already?
  18. Cool bud, the numerous SME's would like to disagree. The 15 has higher wing loading and there is a presentation by a Tomcat pilot on dogfighting the 15, link was in this thread.
  19. Those too, numerous smaller ones. Will be interesting how the ground radar gets affected by ED's Hornet shenanigans in the next update.
  20. No one knows really. What the Viggen still awaits are the new sounds, various art fixes to the pilot model and an external model and texture overhaul. Kind of sad that it became a second class cotizen among all the delays with the Tomcat.
  21. Might actually be something with the radar.
  22. Last I heard they can't because of ED.
  23. No, you wouldnt use the pod for scanning, this is not IRST. The pod can only be slaved to the radar to get better SA and VID.
  24. Yep, the PBG setting does nothing.
  25. :lol:
×
×
  • Create New...