Oceandar

Lol +1

I believe Dundun demanded MP track which could be big in size (I wish I still had it) Well...I guess Dundun is just quite happy with current SD-10 performance lol.

I am glad I have not spent so much time online the past few months, but if I had I would really Be wondering about the honor of some of my opppments, if they were aware they could know every TWS launch. Lol Right now you can use SD-10 like SARH and launch it under 10nm beyond that really small chance to hit.

Its hard to believe, isn't it ? Could it be the sales data based on FC3 F-15C ?

They are on vacation (on another server). The server requires low ping to join ( 250 max?) while its understandable but also problematic to some players in distance region. I admit, sadly, no longer play in this server due to some weapons restriction. I respect the decision but then I also have a choice. Ofc no one would miss me, so who cares lol.

As far as I know, growling sidewinder named it the 2nd most lethal fighter in DCS.GS needs to redo the test or whatever. I dare him lol.

No because it used to at least roughly had the same fps as Hornet even little bit better on my comp.

Well Mike, I can tell you for sure there's something worth to check with Tomcat fps performance. Today I just flew F-16, F-18 and F-14 respectively in GS server. The F-14 performance was the worst with 45 FPS compared with F-16 around 60-80 and F-18 50-60 fps. RAM usage was higher on F-14 with 20GB while F-16 and F-18 only used 17 max.

I didnt say I want it. If ED decide not to model it then I'm ok with it but I'm also ok if they decide otherwise for gameplay maybe ? As an option, hardcore can opt not use it and casual players who couldn't care less with realism and only want having fun and blows something up can use it. The real winner is ED because they could stop hearing nagging and whining from both hardcores and casual players. Its on them to choose.

Make it as an available option to choose is win-win IMO. Let mission designers decide.

Yup. It used to be working but no longer now. I've tried modified viewport lua but it failed the IC in MP. I understand the changed probably has something to do with protection but ED should make kneeboard position unaffected by using multimonitor in the first place. C'mon ED.....

Agreed. My DIY track clip and Opentrack has been working for years. No problem at all. I would spend my money on DCS modules instead.

Great post Dee-Jay [emoji106][emoji106][emoji106] Thanks

I'd be happy with any Apache block, bring it on [emoji4]

I agree with this. Overpowered my 4$@ In A2A (MP pvp) arena the Jeff almost sitting duck where the SD-10 became quite unreliable, easy to notch and has big tendency eating chaffs with odd guidance. Tbh I simply stop flying it online. And I no longer saw many people flying it in MP, only a few.

Lol nice one. I don't mind ED make somekind of FPS module like ARMA. I probably would enjoy it.

Nice, thanks. Btw, what is "earth leg" ??

I've been waiting quite long for someone to post this lol. I agree its odd.

Ok, sold [emoji106][emoji106][emoji106]

Lol, same. I've been playing DCE for F-16 and the wingman kept spamming me obvious contact until I switched the radio freq and switched back before enggagement. I agree this need to be addressed for SP gameplay convinient.

Ha... Will do that. Thanks Miguel. Cheers

Part of the area are already there in PG map, ED just need to expand little bit and populate it.

I agree. Try fight some AI (excellent skill) then you can see how any ARM get spoofed by chaffs. In MP I quite alot got away from 120 by spamming chaffs.

Only got two missions to fly then campaign generator failed to generate next mission after 50 tries and asked me to begin a new one. Its too bad because I actually like it more than I thought I would.

Is this app still working with current OB version? Does it pass IC check? Thanks