Nate--IRL--

The Closer you are to the ground, the more ground reflections interfere with the radars operation, giving false alerts. It is really only useful at higher altitudes. I forget the min alt, IIRC it is some thing like 1000ft maybe. Nate

Kinda, you must jump out of the aircraft with RAlt-J, set the new waypoints with Combined Arms and then RAlt-J back in. It was never intended as a feature but it does work. Nate

You can set waypoints as you like, but to activate dormant aircraft at an airbase would require the use of Radio Command Triggers I would imagine. Nate

Pg 12 of the manual. Nate

Good question - I'll check........... EDIT:- For FC3 aircraft at least, the new waypoints are shown after R-Alt-Jing back into the cockpit. I haven't checked any DCS aircraft. You must R-ALTJ out in order to set waypoints. Then Jump back in. Nate

Hold Shift when placing waypoints on the road. Don't use the set path Button. Nate

It is on the list with a million other known bugs. Nate

He didn't turn on the lights, they are present in the game. Nate

I can route many ground units through cities using roads. You must be doing some thing wrong. Nate

Currently there is only CA. CA2 doesn't exist, but there are already Ideas for it if it ever gets green-lit. Nate

My point still stands - Player Radar was never intended to be a feature of CA. In fact originally the Radar Sams were omitted from player control. Nate

The AI can ford smaller rivers - this behaviour is intentional. Nate

OMG? Has this ever been mentioned as a feature for CA1? Nate

Crazing =/= scratches. Nate

You'd be surprised at the amount of people here who don't. :) Nate

It is a known issue IIRC, Pilot and Battle Commander behaviour for Allies only is not the same IIRC. Nate

Nothing to do with performance IIRC, It just Borks various unrelated aspects of the AI IIRC, As well as causing a few other issues that seemingly have nothing to do with trees or AI. In other words it can be done, it just breaks too many things for it to be a priority. Nate

But that is my point. It is far far better that the criticisms are about the product, and not that some promised item will not be delivered. That lesson has been learned the hard way over the years. The First is constructive, the other Destructive. Nate

Absolutely no. If said feature gets delayed, people scream fraud among other ignorant vitriolic bile. It has happened in the past, repeatedly. Now very very little is announced until it is confirmed to make it in to a release. Blame the asshats screaming blue murder in years past for the current reticence to give details. Nate

I think perhaps it has been in production well before FC3 got anywhere near Beta. It was always going to be done. Nate

I want DCS Flanker so much :( All ED AFAIK. Nate

I don't have to prove it. ED and/or the 3rd party devs have to conduct their own research and make a business decision themselves. Basically the market research done by these companies dictates what gets built. I would be of the opinion that there is a market for something like the Su-27, but is it bigger than say an F-16? That is a simple choice for a Dev. However the problem with this approach is the situation of 2xF-15Es being developed, which in my opinion is absurd. Nate

Sounds like overheating. But need a track to be sure. Nate

Of course it is ok to ask, in fact I think you've answered the question yourself. Less potential sales and difficulty in obtaining information. Nate

What kind of answer do you expect from the developers? Nate