Consider it a right of passage, we've all said something on the forum as Testers, that has comeback to bite us, and trust me, the forum NEVER forgets.
Nate
ED would have shut up shop long ago if they took to heart some of the more ignorant rantings on forums. I would imagine that anybody involved in creating Flight sims know the fans can be their own worst enemy at times.
Nate
I don't see how it is any different what we already have in the A-10 or abris, implementation wise. 3rd party Devs writer their own code for avionics and hook it in to DCS.
Nate
Not really, you can set the cloud deck to, say 100m, any airfield above this will be in the the soup so to speak.
Set the Cloud density to 9 or 10 in the Mission editor for fully over cast skies - set the deck and layer thickness to suit.
Nate
That "Easy cash" as you put it - pays for the fast jet project.
The Idea with the standalone F-15 and Su-27 is to cater to people who prefer mid-fidelity sims, but don't own Lock On. It is not intended to compete with the eventual DCS module.
Nate
Great stuff - thanks.
BTW the reason this effect was removed was the prop on the P-51 introducing strobing effects when flying into the sun - not very good to have for epileptics playing.
Nate
Love that Gif :)
The Stand alone F-15 and Su-27 will be improved upon the FC3 versions (new AFM at least) and are being marketed at those that want a medium fidelity sim but don't own Lock On. There is still a lot up in the air regarding them - so it will become clearer as to what they are, nearer release.
Nate
I know perhaps I am jumping into the deep end here, but......
What do you expect to see?
Perhaps you can provide your equations for missile fight to compare first ?
Would that be too much to ask? I am more than willing to challenge the dev team with solid evidence.
Give us evidence to fix what you think is wrong. Verifiable evidence ONLY.
Nate