=4c=Nikola

How's OP wrong? Btw, this is not bug report, why they've appended [CORRECT AS IS] tag?

Will try, but MAVs really struggle to snap onto a designated target without a little bit of nudging.

They should read these forums.

The fact I need to undesignate target to be able to slew AGM-65 is just stupid. It resets all sensors for no reason other than to prevent you confirming target destruction. A-10C has much more streamlined workflow, and additionally it automatically creates markpoint so you can easily snap back to it even if you lose TGP sight.

Yea, that worked. It was unbinded; very strange as I never touch those settings. Tnx

I've tried. No luck. Rotation works, translation doesn't.

I use default mouse look system: Moving mouse = rotation Scrolling = FOV change Holding scroll button depressed and moving mouse = X & Z translation Holding scroll button depressed and scrolling = Y translation In every other aircraft it works perfectly. In A-10C since cockpit upgrade translation doesn't work.

When you're going to fix this bug?

In my country it's very common.

By ICAO 8168 vol.3: A serviceable altimeter indicates the elevation of the point selected, plus the height of the altimeter above this point, within a tolerance of: a) ±20 m or 60 ft for altimeters with a test range of 0 to 9 000 m (0 to 30 000 ft); and b) ±25 m or 80 ft for altimeters with a test range of 0 to 15 000 m (0 to 50 000 ft). GPS is not that simple. It provides WGS84 based altitude. You would need to apply corrections to get accurate altitude (or height).

The highest priority for me is ability of AI to actually follow assigned flight plan in 4D. Second priority is flight planning tool set that would allow quick creation of flight plans with automated creation of printable and/or ingame operational flight plans.

When exactly do you plan to fix this bug? Should we wait for DCS 5?

Is that really a case? Just wow. :(

No, it's not just you, I've started similar topic, unfortunately, without any support. The problem with flight simmers is that they think flying should be hard and that feeds their ego that they are doing something superior than an average gamer. Reality is, of course, completely different where every designer strives to build an aircraft that's easy to fly. In some DCS aircraft it is impossible to trim out stick forces and that's completely unrealistic.

I do not like the big mfd, looks kinda bodged.

S key is NWS Gain. Anyway, you need to hold LALT + Q to turn off NWS. In the past, it unlocked nose wheel so it would caster freely. Now it has some shimmy effect. Not a big deal since no one really use the feature. This is how it worked in 2014:

Your tracks are locked. Btw, tried to reproduce, it doesn't work. NWS (LALT + Q by default) does nothing in my F-15.

Well, the bankler's script is not that accurate for groove time. I've got penalized many times only to find out my groove was good when replayed the track.

Different retardation mechanism

Relevance? He did not buy SC, why would SC system requirements apply to him?

Very nice and smooth.

I do not know whether Ka-50 missions, training and campaigns are bugged or not, but aircraft itself is feature complete and I'm not aware of any game braking bugs. BS3 will be paid upgrade. BS2 will be discontinued from store but it will be playable. Keep in mind it's an older module, so no fancy features like ins drift and similar...

Some aircraft in DCS are impossible to trim using button keybinds (maybe it's fine with axis). IRL such aircraft would not be considered airworthy. I'm suggesting slider in special options that would allow change of trim sensitivity.

They have hardware signature of pc you are logging in with at their database. Logging in with a different configuration after going offline may be unsuccessful. Anyway, you can always contact user support to resolve that problem.

It's not something DCS should add. It something you should Bodge. :)