TotenDead

Не одними ишаками воевал ссср. Были и як-1, и лагг-3, и миг-3. Да, они были хуже новейших 109ф, но не на столько как и-153 и 16

Потому что есть Дэшный мустанг и курфюрст. Это как делать 15 блок Ф-16А при имеющемся 16С конца 2000-х. Круто, но не профитно)

Зато исторично (с) Самое главное, что хоть какой-то, хоть примерный паритет - это то, что толкает вперёд не только геймплейную составляющую, но в т.ч и продажную. Тип потому что когда против сейбра летают МиГ-15, а не И-16, то есть соревновательный элемент, челлендж, все дела Самолёты времен 2мв - это значительно более простые аэродинамически модели нежели все поствоенное. В теории при нехватке документальных данных их можно сделать и по расчётам с продувками...

Все будут играть на нормандии на том единственном заселенном сервере

That's called flutter, lol. And it depends on loadout So, you have no idea. Right. Yes, because it was replaced by more modern aircraft like Su-30/35/57. What's with the attackers like the Su-25? Ah, don't you War Thunder me. Check on-line servers, most of those are even more arcadey then war thunder sim Wow, the one essential thing. Can't argue, there was 0 times when I needed to do anything with it to get a bearing. Anyway, you know, you could do that in the old IL-2 so, eh, no clickery is needed here. Only devs will You can shoot only 23, only 37, or both. The implementation of switching is a question to the devs for sure. But that's not a problem at all I'm about driving the car, not starting the car. I don't find inserting the key and turning it amusing FC level is more than enough for that Of course. It's okay to love inserting the key, nothing wrong with that. It's just that if one does love that and another doesn't care, in the end both cars drive the same. That's why I'm saying that we have the Su-25 and don't need to make it clickable before we get some redfor jets that we don't have in the game

Let me put it this way. Why would I buy a FF MiG-15 if I have the FC version? Their flight characteristics are equal, their armament is the same. Just to make clicky-wanky clicks inside the cockpit? I get 90% of gameplay for 25% of the price. And 100% of it if we ignore the piano part The MiG-27, on the other hand, adds new capabilities to the redfor. Neither Su-25, nor Mig and Su-27 can do that

Then you should know how it shakes and wants to dive once it reaches such speeds No, not really And what kind of missions do you want? It can do some peasant hunt - sure. But if its target is defended with anything like MANPADS or AAA you'd better turn around and leave There's, actually, a good campaign in DCS, it's about nato invasion of the USSR. But you'll probably need exterior views switched ON to complete it because, well, SAMs and AAA and the plane isn't good against those Aight, what can it do what others don't? Why such attackers arent produced anywhere anymore Why not? I'd gladly read a few words from you about any other of its employment but peasant hunt and rocket lobbing. Yeah, well, procurement of such jets speaks for itself

Maybe. Once there're no other redfor aircraft to make What tradeoff, Su-25 has no a2a capability unless you count 2 R-60s as such? When it comes to scenarios - check any populated on-line server If you ever flew the Su-25 then ypu know HOW it flies at such speeds But such fast planes can fly way higher and way faster when needed. Yeah, well, usually the idea is not to get hit in the first place. As you know, such obsolete rust buckets as A-10 and Su-25 are only suitable to bomb some terrorists from high altitute or loft rockets from 5-8 km from the front line Of course. That's why they'd better be done after there's nothing else to make

But Su-25 is already in the game... From what the late CW scenarios would benefit is the MiG-27M/K. The latter would even be useful in modern scenarios Thanks to its combination of speed And armament But another Su-25? Meh

The best camo of all times because classics

Вот только зачем это делать) Для этого есть правила сервера

Ну такое. На общий геймплей автозапуск никак не влияет

Ну и здорово, вот только кому-то оно не надо, а летать - наоборот надо. Зачем подгонять всех под конкретно свои хотелки?

Каким образом? Хочешь - пользуйся, не хочешь - работай руками

Зачем? Тебя ущемляет, что кому-то не интересно заниматься запуском? Может и так, но не хочется и не интересно) Люблю водить, а не заводить Каждому свое

Зачем? Запускаться руками прикольно первые раз 20, затем уже как-то интереснее процесс пилотирования и ведения боя. Да и забывается последовательность действий когда редко играешь

Если целая куча сомнительно полезных с т.з геймплея действий заменяется кнопкой "автозапуск", то и остальное можно точно так же объединить

That might be true for the first Ka-50, not the second and the third one. And while the helo wasn't produced in large numbers, it was a base for the Ka-52. It's about money, that's it. The Ka-50 was a very hyped heli back in a day, at least in Russia which was the main market for the company in late 2000s. Yes. Among other things, it was well known because of the movie Yeah, well, that's funny. In the last 2 years I've been to Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Kyrgyzstan, Armenia and Azerbaijan. In some of those - multiple times. What's making the situation even more hilarious is that I live in Russia, so yep, never talked to anyone there. Probably. You know, I can offer you to go to the russian part of the forum and check for yourself what people think about all that "secrecy" policy One can find people who faced injustice all over the world. Also, there are many offended whiners of different kinds who are always certain that whatever happens is harmful for them. How could I possibly know from which of those two groups are you? What I do know for sure is that you openly show your strong bias against well, some post-Soviet countries' policies, and I'd assume that mainly against one in particular. In that situation unbiased opinion (even about such a silly topic as game development) is hardly possible

Unfortunately, it's now clear that all your statements are just based on some questionable political beliefs... Ka-50-1/2/3

С холодного тоже. Даже проще, чем на су-25)

Not by ED again. Maybe it's just less about the so-called secrecy and more about profitability (no accusation here)? There's a reason why it was officially stated that any redfor development is dependent on MiG-29 sales and it's called "There're many US fanboys and not so many ru/euro ones" And for that we only have words and some stereotypical beliefs. Was there any case where someone was sentenced for game development (for secrecy reasons) in Russia? Or not

Apparently you don't really need any sensitive docs nowadays to make a module, do you? And what happened to all the fancy european fighters? Why aren't those made by ED? European laws? Su-30MKI is Indian and made its first flight in 2000. It's very close to 30SM, but it was never in RuAF service. And there are many-many videos from air shows with 30SM

Little foggy in your room, I suppose

Even soviet migs couldn't use those. R-73s, on the other hand, could be removed. For example, Iraqi MiG-29s were only equipped with R-60Ms

nullЭтот? Пустоватый чутка вроде