Furiz

wow...

Pure case of its the pilot not the airframe. Still nothing to do with hot/cold start option.

Alright, but all your arguments aren't really a reason not to add such an option, for MP server or missions where mission makers want to have such an option enabled.

Hi, Wasn't it Sniper XR? Or that's the same, if not is this is changed now too? As far as I can find 2007 F-16 had Sniper XR pods.

Yeah, big difference there.

Was gonna report it too but couldn't find any videos on it before. good job. Did some search. This one maybe:

You don't have to wait 5 min, but you just have to have AAR doors open, scroll up I explained exactly how to do it. Off course its easier to drop them and rearm, but if you are going for some realism you can do it with AAR door open. It is after all how it should work, since when you open AAR door ext fuel tanks depressurize and you can fill them up.

That's an assumption, and anyone can make an assumption, I think odds would be in favor of choice, and it would be enabled. But nevertheless it is not a bad idea to have it as an option.

And that's completely fine, that's why it would be optional for mission creators to choose if they want to allow it or not.

Yes exactly that, have the option to choose hot or cold but only if mission designers assign that option, if they want hot or cold they are still able to set it like that. For example there are some MP servers with really good missions that are hot starts and I like to cold start the plane. Another example is a cold start server but if you get shot down many times cold starting a plane can get tiresome, so you could cold start once and later on do hot starts etc...

Option to choose hot or cold start before the mission or when picking a slot in MP server.

Thanks, but we still don't have it reported, dunno if it should be like this or not, something to investigate. Maybe @BIGNEWY can give us a verdict

Should have watched my track:P

Simulator in Naval Airbase

Does this mean our implementation is wrong? Cause I can move TGP in the background, not selected on any MFD.

I don't se Middle - Middle cold war there, and what about Late - Middle cold war, and Middle to Late Vietnam war era, and Past Late Cold Vietnam era

Imagine for example you are in AG mode, and on the left MFG you have FCR - HAD - TGP on your MFD for quick selection, so TGP is SOI and you switch SOI to HUD with DMS Up, then DMS Left and you get HAD on your MFD, now DMS down and your HAD will become SOI. But when you DMS Left again your FCR wont become SOI, HAD will remain SOI. Why would you switch to FCR anyway if you aren't planing to use it. So now when you have switched to the FCR with DMS Left, you have to DMS Down again to make it SOI and you can work with it. If you DMS Left again to get to the TGP you have to DMS Down again to make it SOI and you can work with it. I take it manufacturer wanted only DMS UP or DMS Down to assign SOI, makes sense. My only concern is that you can move sensors while they are not displayed on any of the MFDs.

Yes I'd like this

That's exactly why I'm asking this, I know how to work with it, but it stays selected in the background, and I don't know if this is like it is in real jet or something that needs to be corrected.

Currently if TGP is SOI and MFD page is switched to lets say HAD page, the TGP stays SOI and can be moved around in the background, same happens with other sesors, such as FCR AA and FCR AG, HAD etc. Should sensor SOI be switched as the MFD page / MFD is switched?, or should it be deselected, so it can't be controlled in the background? F-16 SOI question .trk

No, you got it all wrong, its not about their house their rules, no1 is breaking their rules. Behaviour rules are one thing, behaviour can be adjusted by everyone, its that easy. Don't team kill on my server - done. No swearing - done. But buy 1000€ graphics card is not done easy or even possible at all for everyone. There are huge differences in income around the world and computer parts prices are nearly the same globally. So don't try to make this the same as behaviour rules, cause its not the same.

Bottom line is that any kind of enforcing will leave some people out, that's not what we want. After all they are not cheating and anyone can set any graphic setting they want.

Can't accept defeat, bad trait for fighter pilot ;)

One more of many misconceptions, It is not cheat, it is graphic setting, The other misconception you have I'm 100% sure, is that you are the best pilot out there and you are in wonder how on earth you got shot down so you found what you think is an issue and now you are on it, cause there is no way that you got shot down, after all you are the best. Then to counter that you want to enforce rules on everybody. Cause no one can beat the best pilot. Other sim pilots out here, when they get shot down, they start from themselves asking why I got shot down and how I can do better. That's what you need to do and not this, asking for limitations. Humility is a virtue that can get you long way.

It really shouldn't. That's not true, I'm sure everyone is looking forward to realistic clouds. The truth is only you are asking for this and absolutely no one else. Have you even thought this through? How would you enforce it? Upon clicking join - list the graphic setting of a server? cause players should know what they are joining right. Then what if players cant handle some setting, or should we all play at 4k? or 2k? with MSAA? or with SSAA? whatever the admin wants right? what if their computers cant handle that, they are then unable to play on that server, then what happens is that you are limiting the player base. That's why those settings are never limited in any other game, they are all free to choose their own settings on any tournament.