Furiz

You have the same options as he does, so turn on the light?

If your internal tanks are at around 2500lbs or lower it will fill up your ext tanks to full, its just simple mathematics after all;P If you have 2x bags on wings, the refuel rate in relation to internal tank is 1:2 to each ext tank, so if you fill 100lbs to internal tank, 50lbs will be filled to each of the ext tanks.

I don't think they would even consider F1 version since it was AA only, maybe for starters like Eurofighter is gonna be AA and then later upgrade to AG, AG capability comes with F2 standard.

And there is your misconception, ED is not aiming for competitive enviroment. You got shot down, but instead of using those setting to your advantage you want to enforce settings on people. Enforcing stuff on people will just make them go away, just like they go away from those nice countries that like to enforce stuff on people.

I don't fly WW2 planes but checking the prices of those they are 50$, so on sale if 50%? that's 25$, really not that much for full fidelity plane. And FC3 plane is 15$ low fidelity etc. So if you wait for a sale its really not not much of a difference

Gatekeeping? Imagine they do this for him, they make the change, then some other guy steps in says he is navy pilot and its not like that and they need to change, so they change it again, then few months later some other "navy pilot" steps in and says ... you see where this is going? AAR is not science fiction, it not something impossible to do, it requires practice, some need to practice more some need less practice but we all need to practice it. Thousands of pilots in real life did it (with access to AAR ofc), and thousands of sim pilots did too, so keep practicing. And that aid would not help anyone really, cause people that ask for it would not stop using it, so essentially they are asking for aid to help them AAR that would never get turned off cause that aid wont help them get precision needed to AAR, cause obviously with the aid they don't need to be precise so they don't practice it properly, and as soon as they turn it off they would not be able to make it. So in the end the aid you are asking for becomes a feature you'll be using on and on and this sim, by introducing such aids, bit by bit becomes more and more arcade game rather than simulator.

If you are on Steam it wont work, only Standalone version has trials. Once every six months per aircraft. And some planes are not available on trial yet, mostly new ones. It's up to the developer to put them on trial.

Start watching at 1:04:06 - talks about Viper vs Fishbed

We can't know if you did that or not or you are just some guy having no patience to practice AAR and decided to make this kind of post saying "I flew fighter jets" just to make ED believe they need to make it easier. So if you flew Hornet and Tomcat in the Navy, get in touch with ED and help out as SME on the Hornet and Tomcat, I'd love to have this sim as realistic as possible.

Electronic Warfare was present long before that, but I agree, even tho we have it implemented in some small way with jamming, I completely support the idea.

Above 20k it moves like a brick too

Not after the end, at the start of the alignment. Start watching at 2 mins:

I don't think we will get Export variant, I've only heard about Lantrin 2000+ but no idea what the image looks like on it or does it have CCD TV etc Edit: info here - https://www.f-16.net/f-16_armament_article2.html

If you didn't Confirm coordinates at the first 2 min of Norm alignment it will mess up, you have to press enter on both Lat and Long when doing Norm alignment. If its something else, post a track.

When radar antenna is pointed down, and move ACQ Cursor forward from the middle towards top of the MFD my scan elevation on the ACQ Cursor decreases, shouldn't it be increasing? And when you move ACQ Cursor to the bottom of the MFD the elevation increases. F-16 FCR strange elevation .trk

In my opinion with Lantrin, which is older and less capable pod, you don't lose any aspect of a 2007 Viper, since they were using Lantrin after all. We will get Sniper later, and remember Viper is still in EA, and in the future if ED gets access to more info a Litening pod as well.

As I see it, they had information that turned out to be wrong, can happen to anyone, so they are correcting.

So you don't care about realistic representation, you just want to be the best? That's why you are so mad? SniperXR is coming for F-16 later.

You seem to only read what is convenient for you to keep your naggin. This is in the road map: "It is also important to remember that all features of our Viper are in regard to a United States F-16CM Block 50, roughly M4.2+, operated in the 2007-time frame." They found out that the info for the pod they had was indeed for the LANTRIN and not Litening pod, so now they are correcting that misunderstanding, are they doing something wrong here?

Exactly this, they can't choose the time when some info will pop up, but it did pop up and now they are fixing it. Maybe this will push SniperXR towards a sooner implementation. (let's just hope they can do it).

They most likely used Litening II or Sniper XR in 2007 but for Litening ED don't have enough info, so until we get Sniper XR we are stuck with Lantrin.

If that's so all 3 then but no fiction only science

I'd rather have correct stuff then imaginary stuff.

So LANTRIN doesn't have TV mode? what about resolution, image quality etc? Any videos?

I'm guess Wags will make a video