Furiz

Start watching at 1:04:06 - talks about Viper vs Fishbed

We can't know if you did that or not or you are just some guy having no patience to practice AAR and decided to make this kind of post saying "I flew fighter jets" just to make ED believe they need to make it easier. So if you flew Hornet and Tomcat in the Navy, get in touch with ED and help out as SME on the Hornet and Tomcat, I'd love to have this sim as realistic as possible.

Electronic Warfare was present long before that, but I agree, even tho we have it implemented in some small way with jamming, I completely support the idea.

Above 20k it moves like a brick too

Not after the end, at the start of the alignment. Start watching at 2 mins:

I don't think we will get Export variant, I've only heard about Lantrin 2000+ but no idea what the image looks like on it or does it have CCD TV etc Edit: info here - https://www.f-16.net/f-16_armament_article2.html

If you didn't Confirm coordinates at the first 2 min of Norm alignment it will mess up, you have to press enter on both Lat and Long when doing Norm alignment. If its something else, post a track.

When radar antenna is pointed down, and move ACQ Cursor forward from the middle towards top of the MFD my scan elevation on the ACQ Cursor decreases, shouldn't it be increasing? And when you move ACQ Cursor to the bottom of the MFD the elevation increases. F-16 FCR strange elevation .trk

In my opinion with Lantrin, which is older and less capable pod, you don't lose any aspect of a 2007 Viper, since they were using Lantrin after all. We will get Sniper later, and remember Viper is still in EA, and in the future if ED gets access to more info a Litening pod as well.

As I see it, they had information that turned out to be wrong, can happen to anyone, so they are correcting.

So you don't care about realistic representation, you just want to be the best? That's why you are so mad? SniperXR is coming for F-16 later.

You seem to only read what is convenient for you to keep your naggin. This is in the road map: "It is also important to remember that all features of our Viper are in regard to a United States F-16CM Block 50, roughly M4.2+, operated in the 2007-time frame." They found out that the info for the pod they had was indeed for the LANTRIN and not Litening pod, so now they are correcting that misunderstanding, are they doing something wrong here?

Exactly this, they can't choose the time when some info will pop up, but it did pop up and now they are fixing it. Maybe this will push SniperXR towards a sooner implementation. (let's just hope they can do it).

They most likely used Litening II or Sniper XR in 2007 but for Litening ED don't have enough info, so until we get Sniper XR we are stuck with Lantrin.

If that's so all 3 then but no fiction only science

I'd rather have correct stuff then imaginary stuff.

So LANTRIN doesn't have TV mode? what about resolution, image quality etc? Any videos?

I'm guess Wags will make a video

We only asked if we are getting one or the other or both pods, nothing specific on them. At the moment on the roadmap we have: Complete LITENING II Targeting Pod. This mostly consists of correct offset logic and improving display clarity. and then we have: Current Litening/LANTIRN mash-up targeting pod to true LANTIRN targeting pod.

It would be great if they would explain changes in roadmap, not just make a post "updated OP" and then dead comms.

Can someone explain this line from Viper Roadmap Current Litening/LANTIRN mash-up targeting pod to true LANTIRN targeting pod.

Try to remove all mods first if you have any, then if that error appears again do a repair and cleanup.

You know you can replay them

I agree, this would be great.

That would be great, I'd like to have it as real as it can be.