Poor performance after 1.2.9 update

[ljuba]

Did anyone else had the same problem?

Since 1.2.9 update game performance went realy poor!!!!!!!!!

Stucking all the time.

 

My computer is:

Core 2 Quad Q6600 2.4Ghz

8Gb DDR 1333

Nvidia GTX650 2gb ddr5

SSD

Win 7 64bits (recently installed)

 

:cry: :helpsmilie: :joystick:

[rcjonessnp175]

Yes I'm getting lower fpS and lots of stuttering. I even did a full windows and game reinstall, didn't fix it lol. Hopefully somebody comes up with something

[Ninefingers]

Same here, around 8-10 fps less, from 55 to 47 +-.

2 screens + Helios.

New install and no mods.

[heroe]

Same here arround 10fps with the poor performance of this simulator every fps costs

 

i5 2500 3.3

8g ram

gtx670

Edited July 27, 2014 by heroe

[diveplane]

yet to check 1.2.9 will post my findings.

[JABO2009]

same here, more game stuttering after 1.2.9 update.

 

still playable, but less fun.

 

Intel I5-2500 K Quad Core

Win 7 64

ATI HD 6850

Edited July 27, 2014 by JABO2009

[ljuba]

got a bit better!

 

One on the things that was killing FPS were mirrors. After shutting them off it got reasonable better. Other thing that i've done was overclocking my processor and GPU. Now it's functioning at about 15 - 23 fps on the airport and 30 - 40 in the air.

:thumbup: :pilotfly: :megalol: :book:

[Bobby]

+1

 

-15 FPS on 1.2.9

 

WIN764, nvidia GTX570 GS, quad Q6600, 8gbram.....3 monitors...1x 1650x1050 + 2 x 1024x768 for MFD-s

[diveplane]

have to agree here, sadly performance is a little poorer in 1.2.9, but again hopefully this will be addressed in a future patch.

[Lilkiki]

Same here with i7 3770k @ 4.5Ghz + GTX 780Ti, hope a good patch soon !

[REL]

DCS EDGE should help ... right?

[EagleEye]

DCS EDGE should help ... right?

Who knows? Maybe not on youre outdated PC, though.:D;) EDGE will be the last hope for my PC config to.

Edited July 30, 2014 by EagleEye

[WinterH]

I had this sudden inexplicable fps drop with 1.2.8. Now with 1.2.9 though, it feels, don't know, somewhat improved... But for you folks it seems what happened me on 1.2.8 happened to you now.

 

Hoping that EDGE will improve both performance and consistence of performance across hardware.

[diveplane]

imo it would be a wasted process if edge did not also improve frame rates speeds.

 

with the addition of multi gpu support , we should see fps improvements.

[AtaliaA1]

imo it would be a wasted process if edge did not also improve frame rates speeds.

 

with the addition of multi gpu support , we should see fps improvements.

 

 

One can hope. U think an SLi rig. will run this DX9 non SLi supported Sim. in EDGE? What would make it run if it wasn't programmed to support it? EDGE would take that much control over the programming of the visuals? real good news if it works though.

[diveplane]

continued tests on my rig.

 

have to say 1.2.9 been really poor for me in framerates over 1.2.8 , multiplayer is near unplayable, only when masses of aircraft are gathered on parking and taxiways.

 

mainly virtual freeflight server.

worst build in a long time yet for me for performance.

 

tests I even ran with most visuals turned off still fps choppy.

[TAnker737]

Hello I also have awful fps which I don't understand.

I have a 7970 , 3930K and 32GB of ram.

Any help would be appreciated.

[cichlidfan]

imo it would be a wasted process if edge did not also improve frame rates speeds.

 

with the addition of multi gpu support , we should see fps improvements.

 

Matt said this about frame rates when talking about the Rift. Of course, everyone will benefit.

 

One of the biggest reasons for the new engine is for improved frame rates. This will help a lot in meeting comfortable performance requirements. We already support predictive tracking and Time Warp.

[diveplane]

Hello I also have awful fps which I don't understand.

I have a 7970 , 3930K and 32GB of ram.

Any help would be appreciated.

 

wow 32gb ram.

 

still runs poor wtf?

Edited August 1, 2014 by diveplane

[TAnker737]

At best I get 40 fps with no civilian cars / scenery.

and I have to overclock my cpu from 3.8ghz to 4.7ghz

 

Edit: Drops to 20 if I pan to a small town with buildings.

Edited August 1, 2014 by TAnker737

[Lao Fei Mao]

LOL， so I won't update to 1.2.9, just wait for 2.0.0

[ljuba]

crazy things

 

The other day i've been playing with my friends and when i've payed attention on FPS it was at 40 on the ground (airport), got really suprised, but happened never again!!!! :( :mad:

Since then i'm testing things to see what is happening but still no results!

[The_Nephilim]

At best I get 40 fps with no civilian cars / scenery.

and I have to overclock my cpu from 3.8ghz to 4.7ghz

 

Edit: Drops to 20 if I pan to a small town with buildings.

 

 

Now that is weird.. For Arguments sake We will need to decide on a Set mission as everybody will get different FPS depending on what they are doing and system specs.. But if we ALL use the same mission we can get a base and then go from there.. So what would be a good mission for Testing purposes?? Also having the options and graphics settings different it is hard to figure out what is what as we each have different specs too..

 

Also setting a base on what the FPS at it lowest are acceptable.. I prefer to keep my FPS above 30FPS in DCSW.. 25 FPS is not too bad but at a base I like it above 30FPS..

 

I would say try experimenting with your Options in DCSW I know Mirrors and Anti-Aliasing are big FPS killers..

 

You must have been in a very crowded mission or something is amiss on your settings on your PC like a Driver issue or something??

Edited August 2, 2014 by The_Nephilim

[ericoh]

I have the feeling this game gets worse in performance. I am now running 4.2Ghz because ive been reading alot that DCS is CPU intensive, it uses 32%................. We need some serious optimization for DCS! It is extremly curcial for flying to have a stable framerate.

 

Please!

[JABO2009]

can we expect any comment by ED or the mods here, anything ? testers / devs may have certain experience which are the crucial performance issues for 1.2.9 , no?