Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Care to elaborate?

 

+1

i7 2600k -- Noctua NH-D14--Asrock Z75 Pro3--ASUS GTX970 Strix --16Go Ripjaws X 1333--Thermaltake Smart M650--CoolerMaster Silencio 652S--AOC E2752VQ-- Sandisk Extreme II 480GB--Saitek X-52 Pro --SAITEK PZ35 Pedals

  • Replies 2.3k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
2 Heaters..... Only..

 

Which is why they sent 6 MiG-28s to take on 2 F-14As :-p

 

I am still very confused by this, I've done a bit of checking around online and every single source I find says that the aircraft can carry 2 on the wingtips and up to an additional 4 on the under wing pylons. Now I've seen one of the devs say essentially pics or it didn't happen, and one user mention that this capability was near to being useless until low drag pylons were made later in the aircrafts life. Is there a physical limitation on the F-5E-3 that means it is not capable of mounting these pylons or the additional sidewinders, or is it really a "find us a picture" sort of deal?

  • ED Team
Posted
Is there a physical limitation on the F-5E-3 that means it is not capable of mounting these pylons or the additional sidewinders, or is it really a "find us a picture" sort of deal?

 

Without some sort of upgrade, F-5E pylons, pylon circuitry and weapons controls can't use any missiles from underwing pylons, only from wingtips.

 

Any F-5, that carry missiles (AA or AG) on undewing pylons is somehow upgraded version of basic model.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I have yet to find any pix online for F-5Es with any A2A Missiles on underwing pylons, even when searching withing pix of countries known to independantly finance the upgrades to the Avionics and Pylons.

 

By time they got the capability the F-5E was useless outisde of a Light Attack Aircraft Role, 6 AIM-9s didnt mean diddly against modern fighters and you would not be (purposely) sending them up against 4th Gen Or 4.5 Gen Fighters, so most loadouts are pretty much A2G ordinance on the underwing pylons with AIM9s for some type of self defense...

Edited by SkateZilla

Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2),

ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9)

3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs

Posted
I have yet to find any pix online for F-5Es with any A2A Missiles on underwing pylons, even when searching withing pix of countries known to independantly finance the upgrades to the Avionics and Pylons.

 

I have, but apparently it's a moot point :(

Posted

ChileanF-5E.jpg

 

There are plenty of pictures of F-5Es with quirky loadouts, but the default '70s model could only carry AIM-9s on the wingtip pylons as it states in the manual. BST are right to restrict the F-5E to a pair of sidewinders since they are developing an F-5E specifically from the era of the MiG-21Bis.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted (edited)

^ That's Technically an F-5E Tiger III Plus ("Fach")

Upgraded Chilean Variant, that can Carry added stores on the upgraded pylons, Like the Python III/IV Missiles Pictured.

 

it is not an off the line standard F-5E, its an privately funded upgrade thru an individual nation's program.

 

F-5E Tiger III

Upgraded version of the F-5E in use by the Chilean Air Force, with EL/M-2032 radar replacing the original AN/APQ-159.

Edited by SkateZilla

Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2),

ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9)

3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs

Posted

Exactly, anyone can pull an out of context image off the web but at the end of the day the manual is pretty explicit about what stores can be carried where.

[sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]

Posted (edited)

 

Okay m8

 

Yes I am aware of the differences it will have as a module/aircraft vs just a early or basic model F5. In fact I did research posting technical manuals of the various avionics within this very thread.

 

 

However I was clearly speaking about not really noticing any difference with F5-E3 ai performance over the regular AI F5E solely from a game play perspective.

Edited by Kev2go

 

Build:

 

Windows 10 64 bit Pro

Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD,  WD 1TB HDD

 

Posted

F5E ??

 

Hi all,

 

I see that in the folder E:\DCS World OpenBeta\CoreMods\aircraft there are listed a few aircrafts which I didn't know where even there.

For example the F5E! Which I love!

 

Where is this aircraft and how can I fly it??

Kaby Lake @ 4.6Ghz - Gigabyte Z170-D3H - 16Gb DDR4 - Gigabyte GTX 1080 G1 OC - Samsung EVO 250Gb SSD - Seagate 1 Tb HDD - HTC Vive - Rift CV1

Posted

You can't fly it yet, it's an AI unit only. Belsimtek is developing a flyable one, though, so we might get it somewhere next year. Go to their section of the forum for more details.

 

The folder You see comprises a new 3D model of it, introduced recently.

i7 9700K @ stock speed, single GTX1070, 32 gigs of RAM, TH Warthog, MFG Crosswind, Win10.

Posted

check this out!!!

 

it's a 360 video from YouTube of the Swiss F5 display team! !!!

 

watch it in YouTube app:)

 

  • Like 1


 

Water cooled i9-9900K | Maximus Code XI MB | RTX3090  | 64GB | HP Reverb G2 
Posted (edited)

maa1f52.jpg

 

This is before the F-5EM upgrade of the FAB. Brazilian F-5E's would typically carry Aim-9B's, MAA-1's Piranha and Python 3's, on both wingtip and outermost pylon.

 

After the F-5EM upgrade, they can carry pretty much anything anywhere, including Derby BVR missiles.

 

Edit: I had an image in-flight with Aim-9B's on wingtips and Python 3's on pylons. It's no longer available but you can see it here.

Edited by Zibell

[sIGPIC]hi[/sIGPIC]

Posted
maa1f52.jpg

 

This is before the F-5EM upgrade of the FAB. Brazilian F-5E's would typically carry Aim-9B's, MAA-1's Piranha and Python 3's, on both wingtip and outermost pylon.

 

After the F-5EM upgrade, they can carry pretty much anything anywhere, including Derby BVR missiles.

 

Edit: I had an image in-flight with Aim-9B's on wingtips and Python 3's on pylons. It's no longer available but you can see it here.

 

 

another F-5E Tiger III Plus "Fach" Upgraded Variant...

Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2),

ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9)

3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs

Posted
I'm sorry, what? Did you read?

 

Elbit and The Brazilian program, re-designated as F-5M, adds a new Grifo-F radar along with several avionics and cockpit refurbishments, including the Dash helmet. The F-5M has been equipped with new weapon systems such as the Beyond Visual Range Derby missile, Python IV short-range air-to-air missile, SMKBs smart bomb,[40] and several other weapons.

 

Before the M/EM, they were not able to Carry the Pythons

Windows 10 Pro, Ryzen 2700X @ 4.6Ghz, 32GB DDR4-3200 GSkill (F4-3200C16D-16GTZR x2),

ASRock X470 Taichi Ultimate, XFX RX6800XT Merc 310 (RX-68XTALFD9)

3x ASUS VS248HP + Oculus HMD, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS + MFDs

Posted (edited)
Elbit and The Brazilian program, re-designated as F-5M, adds a new Grifo-F radar along with several avionics and cockpit refurbishments, including the Dash helmet. The F-5M has been equipped with new weapon systems such as the Beyond Visual Range Derby missile, Python IV short-range air-to-air missile, SMKBs smart bomb,[40] and several other weapons.

 

Before the M/EM, they were not able to Carry the Pythons

 

They were, but the Python III, as per images.

 

The EM/FM upgraded F-5's all left embraer with the new green-gray camouflage, even the prototypes.

 

And here's another:

 

N02-4-20-2013_012-650x433.jpg

 

Please note the F-5E written in the tail, as opposed to F-5EM.

 

Also, picture is from CRUZEX 2002 exercize, roughly three years before the first modernized F-5's were received.

Edited by Zibell

[sIGPIC]hi[/sIGPIC]

Posted

Then you have to accept that Belsimtek is doing the non-upgraded F-5E, non rewired to shoot missiles from the wing stations.

I don't understand anything in russian except Davai Davai!

Posted (edited)
They were, but the Python III, as per images.

 

The EM/FM upgraded F-5's all left embraer with the new green-gray camouflage, even the prototypes.

 

And here's another:

 

N02-4-20-2013_012-650x433.jpg

 

Please note the F-5E written in the tail, as opposed to F-5EM.

 

Also, picture is from CRUZEX 2002 exercize, roughly three years before the first modernized F-5's were received.

 

Personally, I'd be more inclined to believe the F-5E was able to use the missiles pictured if they were flying and had actual war shot missiles rather than training shapes on the ground. With no other frame of reference these could very well be manufacturer advertisement photos of weapons fitment tests for the F-5EM upgrade. Those types of testing are used to ensure the weapons can physically fit on the aircraft. It doesn't prove they can actually be fired by the jet.

 

They say a picture is worth a thousand words. The caveat to that is that, in the photos, you have to understand the context and content what is being shown in them to understand the true nature of the photo.

 

**EDIT** It is interesting to note that the very first EM upgrade is FAB 4834.... the aircraft in the photo. This was the prototype for the EM program upgrade which further reinforces my assumption that this was weapons fitment testing.

http://www.aviationpros.com/press_release/11368538/tap-me-brazil-delivers-the-first-f5-to-the-fab-after-performing-a-depot-level-inspection

Edited by Vampyre

Truly superior pilots are those that use their superior judgment to avoid those situations where they might have to use their superior skills.

 

If you ever find yourself in a fair fight, your tactics suck!

 

"If at first you don't succeed, Carrier Landings are not for you!"

Posted

Extended root on the vertical tail and prominent fin between canopy and tail (probably an antenna for some electronic equipment) on this aircraft mean that it is not vanilla F-5E anyway.

Wishlist: F-4E Block 53 +, MiG-27K, Su-17M3 or M4, AH-1F or W circa 80s or early 90s, J35 Draken, Kfir C7, Mirage III/V

DCS-Dismounts Script

Posted (edited)

Im ok with with having just the 2 missile aslong as we atleast get the Aim-9P4. (aswell as Aim-9B and Aim-9P3 but it should have a P4 or a P5 as the top choice)

 

There are plenty of F-5E users using the Aim-9P4 (and a few with Aim-9P5) and the P-4 and P-5 where able to be used from any platform that could use older aim-9s (Aim-9P Aim-9J etc)

 

So any Default F-5E would be able to carry the Aim-9P4 or Aim-9P5

(That are All Aspect variants of the Aim-9P)

 

they also both fit the Time frame as the P4 enterd service early 80s (80-82) with the P5 before 85.

Edited by mattebubben
Posted

I doubt the Air Force would do weapons fitting test in the middle of an international training exercise. But yes, our F-5s were ordered with some different stuff, such as the antenna mentioned. Doesn't make it any less an F-5E...

[sIGPIC]hi[/sIGPIC]

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...