Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
probably not priority right now due to core systems implementation but i do hope the interior cockpit gets a bump in textures/ lighting. Dare i say the exterior model looks better.

Oh no you don't! If we let the texture artists get a hold of this, we will have infinite re-do's! :D

 

Though the greater the end result, the better! You guys are doing an awesome job.

DCS: MiG-23

[sIGPIC]

[/sIGPIC]

Make it happen, and take my money! :D

  • Replies 3.6k
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
probably not priority right now due to core systems implementation but i do hope the interior cockpit gets a bump in textures/ lighting. Dare i say the exterior model looks better.

I would prefer an early access with the current textures over any pretty eye-candy... If you need to keep the textur artists occupied, make an overhaul or update AFTER early access. :D

  • Like 1

Shagrat

 

- Flying Sims since 1984 -:pilotfly:

Win 11 | Ryzen 9 7900X3D  | 64GB | GeForce RTX 4090 - Asus VG34VQL1B  | TrackIR5 | Simshaker & Jetseat | VPForce Rhino Base & VIRPIL T50 CM2 Stick on 200mm curved extension | VIRPIL T50 CM2 Throttle | VPC Rotor TCS Plus/Apache64 Grip | MFG Crosswind Rudder Pedals | WW Top Gun MIP | a hand made AHCP | 2x Elgato StreamDeck (Buttons galore)

Posted
I know the whole when its done thing but was there ever a general statement of when this will be out. Say Summer 2017 Fall 2017 and so on

 

Last general statement we got was Q3 2017.

Posted
DMT reenters into VIDEO mode as soon as the camera is within gimbal limits.

 

Since ARBS saved the target position, lock is resumed without pilot interaction.[/i]

 

Do you have any data or feedback on how precise this was? Since it's an inertial system, I'd expect adjustment to be necessary after reacquiring on another pass?

i386DX40@42 MHz w/i387 CP, 4 MB RAM (8*512 kB), Trident 8900C 1 MB w/16-bit RAMDAC ISA, Quantum 340 MB UDMA33, SB 16, DOS 6.22 w/QEMM + Win3.11CE, Quickshot 1btn 2axis, Numpad as hat. 2 FPH on a good day, 1 FPH avg.

 

DISCLAIMER: My posts are still absolutely useless. Just finding excuses not to learn the F-14 (HB's Swansong?).

 

Annoyed by my posts? Please consider donating. Once the target sum is reached, I'll be off to somewhere nice I promise not to post from. I'd buy that for a dollar!

Posted
Do you have any data or feedback on how precise this was? Since it's an inertial system, I'd expect adjustment to be necessary after reacquiring on another pass?

 

Yes. You can always make adjustments to the lock with the TDC. That is called "sweetening" the lock.

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning."

"The three most dangerous things in the world are a programmer with a soldering iron, a hardware type with a program patch and a user with an idea."

Posted (edited)
Yes. You can always make adjustments to the lock with the TDC. That is called "sweetening" the lock.

 

Sorry, I didn't quite understand. So, there is some error introduced in RL, but do you intend to simulate it in the sim? E.g. if I make a lock on a target and decide to do another pass at a target from the opposite direction. Will the target be locked directly or I'd have to adjust the sights slightly?

 

I think DCS supports ground stabilized sensors, so I presume it would be a matter of adding some offset to its last position depending on the time passed and ARBS tracking error specs?

Edited by Dudikoff

i386DX40@42 MHz w/i387 CP, 4 MB RAM (8*512 kB), Trident 8900C 1 MB w/16-bit RAMDAC ISA, Quantum 340 MB UDMA33, SB 16, DOS 6.22 w/QEMM + Win3.11CE, Quickshot 1btn 2axis, Numpad as hat. 2 FPH on a good day, 1 FPH avg.

 

DISCLAIMER: My posts are still absolutely useless. Just finding excuses not to learn the F-14 (HB's Swansong?).

 

Annoyed by my posts? Please consider donating. Once the target sum is reached, I'll be off to somewhere nice I promise not to post from. I'd buy that for a dollar!

Posted
Sorry, I didn't quite understand. So, there is some error introduced in RL, but do you intend to simulate it in the sim? E.g. if I make a lock on a target and decide to do another pass at a target from the opposite direction. Will the target be locked directly or I'd have to adjust the sights slightly?

 

I think DCS supports ground stabilized sensors, so I presume it would be a matter of adding some offset to its last position depending on the time passed and ARBS tracking error specs?

 

No error. It is that SOP for DMT lock is as follows:

 

1. You fly towards your target.

2. You set the VVM over your target.

3. Press the LOCK button. System will lock the geographical position of your target. But since you are doing it from long distance, there will be an error over what you thought the target is vs. to where it really is.

Even if you use DMT, the zoom factor makes it a bit difficult, so the lock spot many times will be off target by a small value.

4. If the lock spot is off target, you use TDC to move the spot where the target is.

 

That's it.

 

Of course, you can also use the TDC to select the target from the DMT without having to point the aircraft towards it. But that is not the recommended practice. Why? Probably because it distracts you from flying the aircraft and can create a target fixation problem, specially if you are attacking heavily defended targets.

 

The recommended way, you get a quick target lock and can update position as required by using TDC and HUD. You don't need the DMT video but it can be used for fine tuning the lock with a quick glance. No need to go heads down.

  • Like 2

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning."

"The three most dangerous things in the world are a programmer with a soldering iron, a hardware type with a program patch and a user with an idea."

Posted
3. Press the LOCK button. System will lock the geographical position of your target. But since you are doing it from long distance, there will be an error over what you thought the target is vs. to where it really is.

 

I'm referring to what you mentioned earlier how the ARBS system will remember the locked position while its out of the DMT gimbals.

 

Since the ARBS system relies on inertial sensor to keep track of this position (rather than e.g. GPS), I presume a positional offset is introduced into this the longer you keep the aircraft away from the DMT gimbals and maneuvering.

 

So, I was initially asking if you have any data or pilot's feedback how noticeable this offset might be?

i386DX40@42 MHz w/i387 CP, 4 MB RAM (8*512 kB), Trident 8900C 1 MB w/16-bit RAMDAC ISA, Quantum 340 MB UDMA33, SB 16, DOS 6.22 w/QEMM + Win3.11CE, Quickshot 1btn 2axis, Numpad as hat. 2 FPH on a good day, 1 FPH avg.

 

DISCLAIMER: My posts are still absolutely useless. Just finding excuses not to learn the F-14 (HB's Swansong?).

 

Annoyed by my posts? Please consider donating. Once the target sum is reached, I'll be off to somewhere nice I promise not to post from. I'd buy that for a dollar!

Posted
I'm referring to what you mentioned earlier how the ARBS system will remember the locked position while its out of the DMT gimbals.

 

Since the ARBS system relies on inertial sensor to keep track of this position (rather than e.g. GPS), I presume a positional offset is introduced into this the longer you keep the aircraft away from the DMT gimbals and maneuvering.

 

So, I was initially asking if you have any data or pilot's feedback how noticeable this offset might be?

 

No, sorry.

"Programming today is a race between software engineers striving to build bigger and better idiot-proof programs, and the Universe trying to produce bigger and better idiots. So far, the Universe is winning."

"The three most dangerous things in the world are a programmer with a soldering iron, a hardware type with a program patch and a user with an idea."

Posted

We have a new team member in the AV-8B NA project, he is an active duty AV-8B pilot, he already have the module and is helping us in fine tuning the aircraft. For those that mingle at Reddit, his name there is Zenithc.

  • Like 3
Posted
We have a new team member in the AV-8B NA project, he is an active duty AV-8B pilot, he already have the module and is helping us in fine tuning the aircraft. For those that mingle at Reddit, his name there is Zenithc.

 

It's always good to get guys with real world experience on the team. Looking forward to the end result!

  • Like 2
Posted
We have a new team member in the AV-8B NA project, he is an active duty AV-8B pilot, he already have the module and is helping us in fine tuning the aircraft. For those that mingle at Reddit, his name there is Zenithc.

 

Nice addition having someone that actually drives the Harrier! Will add even more quality to the module. Will Zenithc be making the training missions? :)

  • Like 2

Intel i5-9600K @ 3.7GHz; Gigabyte Z370XP SLI Mobo; G.SKILL Ripjaws V Series 64GB (4 x 16GB) 288-Pin DDR4

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4080 16GB 256-Bit GDDR6; Thermaltake Water 3.0 Certified Liquid Cooling System

Windows 11 Professional

Pimax Crystal Light /TrackIR 5 in case VR dies; Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog w/ Thrustmaster T-Flight Rudder Pedals

 

Posted
Can't wait for the first post from someone complaining about the FM!! :megalol:

 

:thumbup::pilotfly::joystick:

The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance.

"Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.."

https://ko-fi.com/joey45

 

Posted
Nice addition having someone that actually drives the Harrier! Will add even more quality to the module. Will Zenithc be making the training missions? :)

Negative, but he will advise on them, keep in mind he is pretty much active (and flying the real deal) so he is with us during his spare time.

Posted
Can't wait for the first post from someone complaining about the FM!! :megalol:

 

Here would be my response to that...

 

giphy.gif

Intel i5-9600K @ 3.7GHz; Gigabyte Z370XP SLI Mobo; G.SKILL Ripjaws V Series 64GB (4 x 16GB) 288-Pin DDR4

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4080 16GB 256-Bit GDDR6; Thermaltake Water 3.0 Certified Liquid Cooling System

Windows 11 Professional

Pimax Crystal Light /TrackIR 5 in case VR dies; Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog w/ Thrustmaster T-Flight Rudder Pedals

 

Posted
Negative, but he will advise on them, keep in mind he is pretty much active (and flying the real deal) so he is with us during his spare time.

 

Gotcha. I'm sure it will be quality.

Intel i5-9600K @ 3.7GHz; Gigabyte Z370XP SLI Mobo; G.SKILL Ripjaws V Series 64GB (4 x 16GB) 288-Pin DDR4

GIGABYTE GeForce RTX 4080 16GB 256-Bit GDDR6; Thermaltake Water 3.0 Certified Liquid Cooling System

Windows 11 Professional

Pimax Crystal Light /TrackIR 5 in case VR dies; Thrustmaster HOTAS Warthog w/ Thrustmaster T-Flight Rudder Pedals

 

Posted

great to hear you guys will have a Active Duty pilot on the team for "quality assurance" :thumbup:

  • Like 1

 

Build:

 

Windows 10 64 bit Pro

Case/Tower: Corsair Graphite 760tm ,Asus Strix Z790 Motherboard, Intel Core i7 12700k ,Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 64gb ram (3600 mhz) , (Asus strix oc edition) Nvidia RTX 3080 12gb , Evga g2 850 watt psu, Hardrives ; Samsung 970 EVo, , Samsung evo 860 pro 1 TB SSD, Samsung evo 850 pro 1TB SSD,  WD 1TB HDD

 

  • 2 weeks later...
Posted (edited)

I am wondering how far along development is on the Harrier when compared to the Mirage when it was released in early access. I have a feeling that system implementation on the Harrier is further along when compared to the Mirage.

 

Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk

Edited by Koriel
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...