Dino Might Posted May 17, 2018 Posted May 17, 2018 I prefer SRS to everything else. AGC was a fantastic recent addition. Easy to install and use, great UI and options. It has really added a lot to the blue flag server. I still use TS3 for comms with friends, with SRS dedicated to the full team. I can't think of anything to change on SRS at the moment.
Smokin Hole Posted May 18, 2018 Posted May 18, 2018 The SRS/Blue Flag combo has made this an entirely different sim. I cannot thank the people who've made this combo enough for the hours of intense fun.
exil Posted May 18, 2018 Posted May 18, 2018 The SRS/Blue Flag combo has made this an entirely different sim. I cannot thank the people who've made this combo enough for the hours of intense fun. +1 SRS is (besides 2.5) one of the best things that happened to DCS in the past! The immersion on blueflag with SRS is just perfect! GeForce RTX 4090 Founders Edition - AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 64Gb RAM - Win11 - HP Reverb G1 - Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS (40cm extension) - VKB Sim T-Rudder MKIV Pedals
PeaceSells Posted May 18, 2018 Posted May 18, 2018 +1 (for SRS, because 2.5 not so much so far...) My DCS modding videos: Modules I own so far: Black Shark 2, FC3, UH-1H, M-2000C, A-10C, MiG-21, Gazelle, Nevada map
Sarraceno Posted May 18, 2018 Posted May 18, 2018 question! When the F-18 is released, will it be only blue? of will be shared between both sides?
kobeshow Posted May 18, 2018 Posted May 18, 2018 According to Ciribob they plan on not having airframes on both sides, he didn't say where the Hornet will end up though. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] "DCS World is the main public build, it has nothing to do with being stable" -Bignewy
ouPhrontis Posted May 18, 2018 Posted May 18, 2018 According to Ciribob they plan on not having airframes on both sides, he didn't say where the Hornet will end up though. I think that's best, with all the accepted time-period issues, it is loosely based upon a fictional NATO and Warsaw Pact scenario, it's odd enough with P51s being seen buzzing around. NATO - BF callsign: BLACKRAIN 2x X5675 hexacore CPUs for 24 cores | 72GB DDR3 ECC RAM 3 channel | GTX 1050Ti | 500GB SSD on PCIe lane | CH Products HOTAS | TrackIR5 | Win 7 64
Mira73 Posted May 19, 2018 Posted May 19, 2018 (edited) You are planning to switch to a map of Hormuz ? In the future ? Edited May 19, 2018 by Mira73 X-Plane 11 Payware : Aircraft : Boeing 767-300ER, Airbus 319-100, Airbus 350 XWB, Beechcraft King Air 350, Diamond DA-62 Airport : KATL
lemoen Posted May 21, 2018 Posted May 21, 2018 I think that's best, with all the accepted time-period issues, it is loosely based upon a fictional NATO and Warsaw Pact scenario, it's odd enough with P51s being seen buzzing around. Just imagine the tf51 is a c130 then it'll make more sense. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
ouPhrontis Posted May 21, 2018 Posted May 21, 2018 Just imagine the tf51 is a c130 then it'll make more sense. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Heh, or C47, it being tail-dragger. I could get there if I squint through the bottom of a milk bottle. NATO - BF callsign: BLACKRAIN 2x X5675 hexacore CPUs for 24 cores | 72GB DDR3 ECC RAM 3 channel | GTX 1050Ti | 500GB SSD on PCIe lane | CH Products HOTAS | TrackIR5 | Win 7 64
lemoen Posted May 21, 2018 Posted May 21, 2018 You are planning to switch to a map of Hormuz ? In the future ? Ciribob confirmed in discord that a PG server will be put up, but it'll take a few weeks after launch. I'm quite keen to see what they have in store.
Hatefury Posted May 21, 2018 Posted May 21, 2018 I think that's best, with all the accepted time-period issues, it is loosely based upon a fictional NATO and Warsaw Pact scenario, it's odd enough with P51s being seen buzzing around. Didn't the M2000C end up on both sides for a while. I'd be tempted to let both sides use it for a while or at least until the F-14 is released and then have F-14s on one side (Red) and hornets on the other (Blue). When eventually we get the JF-17 and the F-16 it'll potentially make things easier and whilst the server does try and follow a scenario you want to encourage people to fly on both sides. Putting all the new aircraft on blue team would create a horrible server where everyone just plays blue. I agree it would be the most realistic as there are a lot of blue aircraft coming, it just wouldn't make for an entertaining environment. Also I agree the P51s floating around is odd but I guess its that or give both sides the Huey and MI8 as not everyone has both, or are capable of flying both.
lemoen Posted May 21, 2018 Posted May 21, 2018 Didn't the M2000C end up on both sides for a while. I'd be tempted to let both sides use it for a while or at least until the F-14 is released and then have F-14s on one side (Red) and hornets on the other (Blue). When eventually we get the JF-17 and the F-16 it'll potentially make things easier and whilst the server does try and follow a scenario you want to encourage people to fly on both sides. Putting all the new aircraft on blue team would create a horrible server where everyone just plays blue. I agree it would be the most realistic as there are a lot of blue aircraft coming, it just wouldn't make for an entertaining environment. Also I agree the P51s floating around is odd but I guess its that or give both sides the Huey and MI8 as not everyone has both, or are capable of flying both. Moving the M2000 to Red only has done wonders for the balance. It is a very popular aircraft (for good reason) and will draw people to one side or another, and has.
Hatefury Posted May 21, 2018 Posted May 21, 2018 I agree that moving the M2000C to red only was a good choice. What I'm saying is having the Hornet blue only without having an equally popular aircraft on red would re upset the balance.
PeaceSells Posted May 21, 2018 Posted May 21, 2018 Maybe F-18 on one side and M2000 plus A-10C on the other? My DCS modding videos: Modules I own so far: Black Shark 2, FC3, UH-1H, M-2000C, A-10C, MiG-21, Gazelle, Nevada map
Sarraceno Posted May 21, 2018 Posted May 21, 2018 better the F-18 in both sides, at least untill the JF-17. M2000 is mainly an interceptor after all with meager AG capabilities, and still weakly armed for its main role ... on other note... what's with the Viggens and Harriers in FARPS? i know they were designed with that in mind, at least in part, but at least give them a chance to rearm
lemoen Posted May 21, 2018 Posted May 21, 2018 better the F-18 in both sides, at least untill the JF-17. M2000 is mainly an interceptor after all with meager AG capabilities, and still weakly armed for its main role ... on other note... what's with the Viggens and Harriers in FARPS? i know they were designed with that in mind, at least in part, but at least give them a chance to rearm In two weeks when the Hornet launches, it will not be any better than the M2000 at anything. It is slower, uses more fuel and has worse Fox 1 missiles and has the same ground strike abilities as the M2000. We're gonna be bug swatting on RED, all day long :pilotfly:
ZHeN Posted May 21, 2018 Posted May 21, 2018 BF is unplayable today ... crashed three times in a row ... in 1.5hrs [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Sarraceno Posted May 21, 2018 Posted May 21, 2018 In two weeks when the Hornet launches, it will not be any better than the M2000 at anything. It is slower, uses more fuel and has worse Fox 1 missiles and has the same ground strike abilities as the M2000. We're gonna be bug swatting on RED, all day long :pilotfly: I know, but it will be just temporary, when updates begin to come F-18 will get capabilities well boosted, while M2000 still mainly an interceptor
Sierra99 Posted May 22, 2018 Posted May 22, 2018 Seriously... Would really it be to much to ask to have SA-11s REMOVED from the map until ED fixes the Lag spikes they create when they fire? Getting tired of flying 20-30 minutes in a helicopter only to die as I am landing when someone across the map from me flys into a SAM WEZ. K TNX BAI [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Primary Computer ASUS Z390-P, i7-9700K CPU @ 5.0Ghz, 32GB Patriot Viper Steel DDR4 @ 3200Mhz, ZOTAC GeForce 1070 Ti AMP Extreme, Samsung 970 EVO M.2 NVMe drives (1Tb & 500 Gb), Windows 10 Professional, Thrustmaster Warthog HOTAS, Thrustmaster Warthog Stick, Thrustmaster Cougar Throttle, Cougar MFDs x3, Saitek Combat Rudder Pedals and TrackIR 5. -={TAC}=-DCS Server Gigabyte GA-Z68XP-UD3, i7-3770K CPU @ 3.90GHz, 32GB G.SKILL Ripjaws DDR3 @ 1600Mhz, ZOTAC GeForce® GTX 970.
Jugdriver Posted May 22, 2018 Posted May 22, 2018 Seriously... Would really it be to much to ask to have SA-11s REMOVED from the map until ED fixes the Lag spikes they create when they fire? Getting tired of flying 20-30 minutes in a helicopter only to die as I am landing when someone across the map from me flys into a SAM WEZ. K TNX BAI On That Note, Ciribob by any chance have you reported this to ED? I know there was a thread about this on another part of the forum but it was vague and the response was it should improve with the memory manager, that was 2 months ago. I hope ED is clearly aware of what the SA-11 is doing to/in multiplayer. JD AKA_MattE
Hazzerboraco Posted May 23, 2018 Posted May 23, 2018 Can you play as ground commander on blue flag? :matrix: :joystick: ....... BOOOOOOOMMMMMMMMMMMM ....... :megalol:
dedde01 Posted May 23, 2018 Posted May 23, 2018 Can you play as ground commander on blue flag? You can play as GCI, but about ground commander you can move only the JTAC and the troops (with the JTAC you can also get inside it) SILVER 11 | Dedde DCS MODULES: A-10C; F-15C ; M2000C; AV-8B N/A; F/A-18C; SA342; CA. Asus PRIME Z490-P ; Intel Core i7 10700K @4.9 GHz; Nvidia GeForce GTX1070 8Gb ; Corsair Vengeance LPX Black 32Gb (2x16Gb) DDR4 @3200MHz; Samsung 850 EVO 256Gb ; Samsung 24" 1920x1080 @60Hz; TrackIr 5; Hotas Warthog; Thrustmaster TFRP; Turtle Beach PX22;
QuiGon Posted May 25, 2018 Posted May 25, 2018 (edited) Will the other BlueFlag servers get updated to 2.5.2 as well? Edited May 25, 2018 by QuiGon Intel i7-12700K @ 8x5GHz+4x3.8GHz + 32 GB DDR5 RAM + Nvidia Geforce RTX 2080 (8 GB VRAM) + M.2 SSD + Windows 10 64Bit DCS Panavia Tornado (IDS) really needs to be a thing!
Shively Posted May 26, 2018 Posted May 26, 2018 Hey, is something amiss with the mission? Red team's MiG-21s and Mirages can't take their countermeasure pods despite being able to a few nights ago, likewise no fuel tank availability for either. As well, I've noticed an inability to get airfields to rearm Su-25t's at Nalchik & Mozdok. I figured this would have something to do with the resupply system, but after switching around all of red's airfields, could not get countermeasures for MiG-21 anywhere.
Recommended Posts