baltic_dragon Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Hey folks, I've talked to Prowler and decided to surface the idea, or rather a poll, here for you to help us decide where to place the campaign. As some of you probably know I will be doing first the training and then the normal, full - length campaign for the Harrier. Now my idea is to do the training more in a form of a campaign than just standard training missions, which will be linked with the combat one that will follow some time after. This is a very early stage, as I don't want to start working on anything substantial until the plane is in an advanced and stable stage to avoid having to redo or upgrade things. Still, I'll let this poll run for several months to see what the general feeling is. So, the question is simple - in which theatre would you prefer to have the training and the main campaign: A) Both training and campaign in Caucasus B) Training in Nevada and campaign in Caucasus C) Both training and campaign in Nevada (so another Red Flag) Also, if any of you is interested in helping with the campaign (mainly in the form of VOs, but I'd also welcome any experience and knowledge about the Harriers) please let me know here or via PM. Appreciate the feedback! BD Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TomCatMucDe Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 we need carrier ops so Caucasus :) 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
joey45 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Both in caucuses. using mobile 1 The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pikey Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Caucasus. We can't assume that all Harrier purchasers will be NTTR ones, but my own reason is that it has sea, without which no Carrier training can come. It's a no brainer on so many levels. 1 ___________________________________________________________________________ SIMPLE SCENERY SAVING * SIMPLE GROUP SAVING * SIMPLE STATIC SAVING * Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gabuzomeu Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Hello, Baltic. Great news you will be doing the campaigns. More than happy to help with VO and/or testing. To allow for everybody (and not the happy Las Vegas crew) to enjoy your work (which btw adds to the product attractiveness) AND , as importantly, to allow carrier ops at SEA for our beloved MARINES aircraft, both campaign have to be in a free map with sea, ie Caucasus. Best regards 1 Details: Asus Z-170E, Intel i5-6600K @ 4.2GHz, 16GB RAM MSI GTX970 Gaming 4G Win 10 Home Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ebabil Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 carrier ops in black sea training in nevada FC3 | UH-1 | Mi-8 | A-10C II | F/A-18 | Ka-50 III | F-14 | F-16 | AH-64 | Mi-24 | F-5 | F-15E| F-4| Tornado Persian Gulf | Nevada | Syria | NS-430 | Supercarrier // Wishlist: CH-53 | UH-60 Youtube MS FFB2 - TM Warthog - CH Pro Pedals - Trackir 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MBot Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Since having the campaign on a pay-map is already on the table, may I offer another suggestion? 1989 (first year the AV-8B(NA) was operational), the Soviets are overrunning Europe. NATO forces are severely beaten and the Soviets are taking disastrous losses as well. Severely weakened, the Soviet 2nd strategic echelon barely occupies France. NATO launches a final counterattack with the last remaining reserves. The offensive is lead by the 1st Marine Division swung from the Pacific to the Atlantic, by making an amphibious landing at the beaches of Normandy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
myHelljumper Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Since having the campaign on a pay-map is already on the table, may I offer another suggestion? 1989 (first year the AV-8B(NA) was operational), the Soviets are overrunning Europe. NATO forces are severely beaten and the Soviets are taking disastrous losses as well. Severely weakened, the Soviet 2nd strategic echelon barely occupies France. NATO launches a final counterattack with the last remaining reserves. The offensive is lead by the 1st Marine Division swung from the Pacific to the Atlantic, by making an amphibious landing at the beaches of Normandy. EPIC !!! Helljumper - M2000C Guru Helljumper's Youtube https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCK3rTjezLUxPbWHvJJ3W2fA Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cunctator Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 +1 For the Normandy idea. The map seems to be a perfect fit for the AV-8B. Providing CAS for Marines at the Normandy beachhead out of auxiliary airfields directly behind the front lines. Using the Harrier in a Cold War scenario it was originally envisioned for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
comie1 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Some Carrier ops in black sea would be Saweet!!! Nevada Training [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] https://www.twitch.tv/comie1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Schmirco Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 +1 for Caucasus LHA/Carrier assault campaign and train over NTTR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
T_A Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Your M2KC campaign is very high quality and well made , i just wished that the training and operation were separated into 2 campaigns IAF.Tomer My Rig: Core i7 6700K + Corsair Hydro H100i GTX Gigabyte Z170X Gaming 7,G.Skill 32GB DDR4 3000Mhz Gigabyte GTX 980 OC Samsung 840EVO 250GB + 3xCrucial 275GB in RAID 0 (1500 MB/s) Asus MG279Q | TM Warthog + Saitek Combat Pedals + TrackIR 5 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cichlidfan Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 So the consensus seems to be that no campaigns should ever be made for a map that is not free. Then what is the point of having other maps? By that logic, there should not be any campaigns for any aircraft that are not free because people would have to own the aircraft. :doh: ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1 :thumbup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tilly-B Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Caucasus makes more sense if you are incorporating an LHD. It would be great to see the Mirage and the Harrier working together too! Escorting and Buddy lasing for each other respectively :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texac Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 It would make more sense to create training missions first of all for the free Caucasus terrain with carrier ops which everyone can access while the campaign/s would take place in any terrain. In my opinion the main thing should be to create the training missions for Caucasus first of all. So that everyone can practise flying the aircraft without to purchase any other terrain. - My Skins/Liveries - Improved F-16C Texture Template • Texac on YouTube • Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mwd2 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 A campaign on Normandy would be cool - hide behind trees and hedges :thumbup: Playing: F-16C Intel i7-13700KF, 64GB DDR5 @5600MHz, RTX 4080 ZOTAC Trinity, WIN 11 64Bit Prof. Squadron "Serious Uglies" / Discord-Server: https://discord.gg/2WccwBh Ghost0815 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cichlidfan Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 It occurs to me that building a campaign of any kind for the Caucasus should be avoided until after v2.5 is out. ASUS ROG Maximus VIII Hero, i7-6700K, Noctua NH-D14 Cooler, Crucial 32GB DDR4 2133, Samsung 950 Pro NVMe 256GB, Samsung EVO 250GB & 500GB SSD, 2TB Caviar Black, Zotac GTX 1080 AMP! Extreme 8GB, Corsair HX1000i, Phillips BDM4065UC 40" 4k monitor, VX2258 TouchScreen, TIR 5 w/ProClip, TM Warthog, VKB Gladiator Pro, Saitek X56, et. al., MFG Crosswind Pedals #1199, VolairSim Pit, Rift CV1 :thumbup: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cunctator Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Nevada should be the natural place for US aircraft training campaigns. It is the best way to use this map. If nobody supports NTTR map with campaigns because many players don't own it, there will be no incentive for anybody to buy it. Looks like a vicious circle. Would be a waste of a very fine map. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VooDoo-S8 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 I voted for training in Nevada with the campaign in Caucasus however, what about initial aircraft training in Nevada and then carrier training and campaign in the Black Sea? Wouldn't this mimic real life to a degree? My rig - I5 6600k @ 4.5 - Corsair H100i GTX - Maximus Hero viii - 16GB Corsair Dominator Platinum ROG edition DDR4 3200mhz - Gigabyte 1080ti (Overclocked) - TM Warthog Hotas - Saitek Combat Rudder pedals - Oculus Rift CV1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sweep Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Since having the campaign on a pay-map is already on the table, may I offer another suggestion? 1989 (first year the AV-8B(NA) was operational), the Soviets are overrunning Europe. NATO forces are severely beaten and the Soviets are taking disastrous losses as well. Severely weakened, the Soviet 2nd strategic echelon barely occupies France. NATO launches a final counterattack with the last remaining reserves. The offensive is lead by the 1st Marine Division swung from the Pacific to the Atlantic, by making an amphibious landing at the beaches of Normandy. This. Lord of Salt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texac Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 (edited) Nevada should be the natural place for US aircraft training campaigns. If nobody supports NTTR map with campaigns because many players don't own it, there will be no incentive for anybody to buy it. I also would like to have more stuff for Nevada now except for the Caucasus map which will get an overhaul in the future. Also there are only two campaigns available for the NTTR made by ED. I'd like to have more campaigns for Nevada as well especially if it's possible to fly them with US or western build aircraft. However with the AV-8B's carrier capabilities I would rather like it more to fly it over any sea map. So Caucasus would be ideal for a campaign now as well as training missions. Normandy maybe too once it is possible. Edited March 6, 2017 by Texac - My Skins/Liveries - Improved F-16C Texture Template • Texac on YouTube • Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
X93355 Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 Nevada only as we should be able to do a lot more with the AV8B once the Strait of Hormuz is released. Am hoping that is on track for later this year after 2.5 released. We do need to move forward and for those that don't have Nevada yet, it is stunning. InWin S Frame with Asus Z170 | i7-6700K @ 4.5 Water Cooled CPU and Graphics | 16GB DDR4 | GTX1070 | 240GB M.2 SSD | Warthog Hotas | MFG Crosswind | 40" Samsung 4K | CV1 | Replica MB Mk10 Ejection Seat with Gametrix 908 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cunctator Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 I'd like to have more campaigns for Nevada as well especially if it's possible to fly them with US or western build aircraft. However with the AV-8B's carrier capabilities I would rather like it more to fly it over any sea map. So far we have no carrier for Harriers. When it comes it will probably be many months after the Harrier was released and a separate DLC. Thus they can bundle it with an own small (training) campaign. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Texac Posted March 6, 2017 Share Posted March 6, 2017 So far we have no carrier for Harriers. When it comes it will probably be many months after the Harrier was released and a separate DLC. Thus they can bundle it with an own small (training) campaign. After the M-2000C arrived in DCS it took many months to develop and release a campaign for the Mirage. I don't know how long it will take to build the campaign. It might take many months as well so that they can start off with an older carrier model which will then be replaced with the new one that fits to the Harrier. Only if that is possible for baltic_dragon. - My Skins/Liveries - Improved F-16C Texture Template • Texac on YouTube • Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
baltic_dragon Posted March 7, 2017 Author Share Posted March 7, 2017 Since having the campaign on a pay-map is already on the table, may I offer another suggestion? 1989 (first year the AV-8B(NA) was operational), the Soviets are overrunning Europe. NATO forces are severely beaten and the Soviets are taking disastrous losses as well. Severely weakened, the Soviet 2nd strategic echelon barely occupies France. NATO launches a final counterattack with the last remaining reserves. The offensive is lead by the 1st Marine Division swung from the Pacific to the Atlantic, by making an amphibious landing at the beaches of Normandy. Hey MBot, I really like this idea. I don't think it would be possible as an initial campaign, but that certainly is a good option for a later - date DLc once the map is done and stable. It migh also be a good incentive for those who only fly modern jets to buy the map. So thanks for the suggestion, I will return to it! Your M2KC campaign is very high quality and well made , i just wished that the training and operation were separated into 2 campaigns Thanks! And I think it will, training campaign (campaign mind you, so with a storyline, characters, other pilots etc) first and then the normal, full - fledged campaign later on. It would make more sense to create training missions first of all for the free Caucasus terrain with carrier ops which everyone can access while the campaign/s would take place in any terrain. In my opinion the main thing should be to create the training missions for Caucasus first of all. So that everyone can practise flying the aircraft without to purchase any other terrain. See above, training missions will come first. Would not be possible to develop everything at the same time, as campaign building is a very, very time consuming process. It occurs to me that building a campaign of any kind for the Caucasus should be avoided until after v2.5 is out. I won't start working on it (not counting the general idea, character development etc) until the module is in a state similar to M-2000C now. I don't want to repeat the same scenario as with Mirage, where I worked on the campaign as the plane was being built and I missed out some of the features and opportunities it offered. But I will catch up on those in Nevada Red Flag ;) So far we have no carrier for Harriers. When it comes it will probably be many months after the Harrier was released and a separate DLC. Thus they can bundle it with an own small (training) campaign. That remains to be seen. It is quite possible that carrier will arrive just in time to be included in the campaign. Too early to know. Thanks for all the feedback! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts