Jump to content

FAQ Updates and Discussion


NineLine

Recommended Posts

  • ED Team
This. Pretty sure that many scratches would deadline a bird as a hazard to pilot visibility.

 

While it might need some tweaking, I dont think it needs to be removed, the sun hitting it just right is going to show off any and all blemishes...

scratches.thumb.png.573fa0748dd9b6bc87f2567edbe0d34a.png

64Sig.png
Forum RulesMy YouTube • My Discord - NineLine#0440• **How to Report a Bug**

1146563203_makefg(6).png.82dab0a01be3a361522f3fff75916ba4.png  80141746_makefg(1).png.6fa028f2fe35222644e87c786da1fabb.png  28661714_makefg(2).png.b3816386a8f83b0cceab6cb43ae2477e.png  389390805_makefg(3).png.bca83a238dd2aaf235ea3ce2873b55bc.png  216757889_makefg(4).png.35cb826069cdae5c1a164a94deaff377.png  1359338181_makefg(5).png.e6135dea01fa097e5d841ee5fb3c2dc5.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Replies 283
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Watching Wags Livestream can we get rid of the crazy paving on the Canopy before release,. It's really annoying in the Harrier and it looks like we are gonna have the same problem with the F18. It is totally unrealistic.

 

Probably should add that other than that it looks great ������

I don't understand why ppl think this is annoying and unrealistic. How is scratches on a canopy unrealistic?

i9 9900k @5.1GHz NZXT Kraken |Asus ROG Strix Z390 E-Gaming | Samsung NVMe m.2 970 Evo 1TB | LPX 64GB DDR4 3200MHz

EVGA RTX 3090 FTW3 Ultra | Reverb G1  | HOTAS Warthog | Saitek Flight Pedals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest Guest

I read something about an AOA tone in the Hornet NATOPS. Is the tone in the Hornet like the AOA tone in the F15 that gives you a low frequency beep when AOA is getting too high and a high frequency beep when you're on AOA? Just curious because I find that feature of the F15 very handy for regulating my pull on the stick in a dogfight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Switzerland

Fliegerstaffel 11, Air Wing 13

Fliegerstaffel 17, Air Wing 11

 

Please add Fliegerstaffel 18 too

 

I can provide high-res tail logo images from the original author for Flst 17 and 18

X-Plane 11.5x / DCS 2.5.6 / P3Dv5 / Aerofly FS 2 / War Thunder

 

Win10-x64 | ASUS Z390 Maximus VI | Intel i7-9700K @3.6GHz | Corsair Vengeance LPX 32 GB DDR4 | 6TB SSD Samsung 850 Pro | 2TB M2 PCI 4x | ASUS GTX 1080 ROG STRIX 8GB DDR5X | TM Hotas Warthog | Saitek Combat Pedals | Oculus Rift S

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This. Pretty sure that many scratches would deadline a bird as a hazard to pilot visibility.

 

What makes you think they are scratches?

 

Could they not also be microscopic cracks within the matrix of the canopy? Any and all materials subjected to stress will develop what are in the case of the canopy purely refractive defects. Why would they be defined as a hazard if they don't affect the structural integrity of the component?

 

I take it you have never flown in an airliner and looked out of a window when the sun shines directly through it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

What makes you think they are scratches?

 

Could they not also be microscopic cracks within the matrix of the canopy? Any and all materials subjected to stress will develop what are in the case of the canopy purely refractive defects. Why would they be defined as a hazard if they don't affect the structural integrity of the component?

 

I take it you have never flown in an airliner and looked out of a window when the sun shines directly through it.

 

 

It's in his post, it's a hazard because it gives poor visibility.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I take it you have never flown in an airliner and looked out of a window when the sun shines directly through it.

 

I take it you’ve never maintained or operated a tactical aircraft?

 

A tactical aircraft is not an airliner. We operate with damage limits much lower and maintenance standards far superior than any airline (well most of us in the West at least). An airliners passenger windows are nothing but structural components that give the self loading freight something to look out of, they are not involved in RCS reduction, crew escape, supersonic high g flight, or any other area of consideration for military aircraft.

 

Even a scratch/imperfection a few mm in size is cause to reject a canopy if it’s in the critical sight areas and impedes vision for the pilot.

 

Spoiler

Intel 13900K (5Ghz), 64Gb 6400Mhz, MSi RTX 3090, Schiit Modi/Magi DAC/AMP, ASUS PG43UQ, Hotas Warthog, RealSimulator FSSB3, 2x TM MFDs + DCS MFDs, MFG Crosswinds, Elgato Steamdeck XL

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The centre MFD behind the stick. Would ED be able to build in a slider bar in the options menu, which enables us to make the joystick transparent, bit like the KA50 hud display? Conscious those of us without VR will get annoyed with the moving map obstructed by the stick. I don’t personally stare at the stick in any of the pits I fly in anyway.

My Hangar:

F16C | FA18C | AH64D | F14A/B | M2000C | AV8B | A10C/ii | KA50/iii | Chinook | UH1H | Gazelle | FC3 | CA | Supercarrier

 

My Spec:

Obsidian750D Airflow | Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K | 32GB DDR4 Vengeance @3600 | RTX3080 12GB OC | ZXR PCIe | WD Black 2TB SSD | Log X56 | Log G502 | TrackIR | 1 badass mutha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The centre MFD behind the stick. Would ED be able to build in a slider bar in the options menu, which enables us to make the joystick transparent, bit like the KA50 hud display? Conscious those of us without VR will get annoyed with the moving map obstructed by the stick. I don’t personally stare at the stick in any of the pits I fly in anyway.

 

 

 

Look around it with TrackIR or bind something to a custom Snap view.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Rig: SimLab P1X Chassis | Tianhang Base PRO + Tianhang F-16 Grip w/ OTTO Buttons | Custom Throttletek F/A-18C Throttle w/ Hall Sensors + OTTO switches and buttons | Slaw Device RX Viper Pedals w/ Damper

Tactile: G-Belt | 2x BK LFE + 1x BK Concert | 2x TST-429 | 1x BST-300EX | 2x BST-1 | 6x 40W Exciters | 2x NX3000D | 2x EPQ304

PC/VR: Somnium VR1 Visionary | 4090 | 12700K

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The centre MFD behind the stick. Would ED be able to build in a slider bar in the options menu, which enables us to make the joystick transparent, bit like the KA50 hud display? Conscious those of us without VR will get annoyed with the moving map obstructed by the stick. I don’t personally stare at the stick in any of the pits I fly in anyway.

 

+1

 

An option to toggle the flight stick would be very welcome!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

+1

 

An option to toggle the flight stick would be very welcome!

 

Agree.

I was asking a few months ago in Russian wish list thread about option to make stick invisible :)

PC: i9-10850K ~5.2GHz / Asus Rog Strix H490 Gaming, Asus GTX1080 Rog Strix Gaming OC, HyperX Fury RGB 32Gb RAM 3200MHz, SSD 512Gb, HDD 1Tb, Windows 10 x64. 2 x Samsung Curved 32" 

VirpilControls software engineer

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really don't see why they wouldn't...

Sytem Specs: Asus armor Z170 mobo, Intel 6700k i7 chip, gtx 1080, 32g DDR4, 800watt pws, Win10, Samsung NVME M.2 256G Drive, 1T Samsung Evo SSD, 250G Corsair SSD, Asus 4k 28" 60hz Monitor, Oculus Rift, WarthogTM stick and throttle, CH rudder pedals

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Already included.

That settles that.

 

I'm an unconditional Rift user myself, refusing to play any game that's not VR. Except maybe Civ III. :helpsmilie:

 

I have a serious DCS feature proposition to help TrackIR/2D users enjoy such aircraft as the L-39 with the (huge) gunsight and the Mig-15 with its right-in-the-middle-of-everything centerline canopy frame.

 

In which sub-forum, or to whom may I direct some description and images of the concept? In short, it would be a toggle for near/far-focus plane, mimicking binocular vision and its perceived see-though consequences.

i7-7700K@4.8GHz, 16Gb-3200, GTX-1080Ti-Strix-11Gb, Maximus IX Hero, Oculus Rift, Thrustmaster Warthog+F/A-18C, Logitech G940 Pedals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sweet!

My Hangar:

F16C | FA18C | AH64D | F14A/B | M2000C | AV8B | A10C/ii | KA50/iii | Chinook | UH1H | Gazelle | FC3 | CA | Supercarrier

 

My Spec:

Obsidian750D Airflow | Z690 Tomahawk | 12700K | 32GB DDR4 Vengeance @3600 | RTX3080 12GB OC | ZXR PCIe | WD Black 2TB SSD | Log X56 | Log G502 | TrackIR | 1 badass mutha

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it's not that important, but, please, revise the canopy scratches, they look awfully repeating at some points :(

Acer Aspire E5-571G-713W/Intel® Core™ i7-4510U 2.0-3.1GHz/12 GB DDR3 L Memo/NVIDIA® GeForce® 820M 2 GB/1000 GB HDD

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe it's not that important, but, please, revise the canopy scratches, they look awfully repeating at some points :(

 

On static screenshots, maybe, but I doubt it's noticeable while moving your head. Less repetition means longer load times. Which do you prefer?

i7-7700K@4.8GHz, 16Gb-3200, GTX-1080Ti-Strix-11Gb, Maximus IX Hero, Oculus Rift, Thrustmaster Warthog+F/A-18C, Logitech G940 Pedals.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...