Jump to content

Request official flight model update

Chops

By Chops
in DCS: F/A-18C

 Share

Recommended Posts

Chops

Chops

Posted
Posted

Matt and/or Developers,

 

I really appreciate and enjoy your update videos, however, I have not seen any official comments regarding the Hornet flight model. Will you please provide an update on the current flight model status? Is the flight model considered complete at this time, or are there still outstanding issues that are being worked on?

 

Since the early access release, there have been numerous posts and speculation in the F-18 Forum regarding problems/issues with the flight model from customers. I have also seen occasional responses from SME's indicating that they feel the flight model is off, and that the Developers are aware of issues with the flight model.

 

The June 13, 2018 patch update contained this fix - "Fixed the behavior of the aircraft when flaps extended from the AUTO to HALF/FULL positions." However, this doesn't really explain what exactly was changed, or what the perceived problem was prior to the fix.

 

Obviously, the flight model is the most fundamental "feature" of the DCS F-18, so it is a bit curious that there has not been any official comment or update on where things stand.

 

Based on the number of flight model posts in the forums, I bet a lot of your customers would appreciate an update and in-depth discussion of the flight model from official Eagle Dynamics sources.

 

Thank you.

Wait4It

Wait4It

Posted
Posted

I would not expect any major changes. Perhaps some fine tuning in the extremes of flight. I also recall seeing hornet pilots comments that it's very accurate.

VDV

VDV

Posted
Posted

Hornet's flight model is very realistic and accurate now. No need to changes. And real Hornet pilots says the same.

bbrz

bbrz

Posted
Posted
Hornet's flight model is very realistic and accurate now. No need to changes. And real Hornet pilots says the same.

Oh, it's new to me that the real F/A-18 gets sucked down / pitches down at a very low altitude.

i7-7700K 4.2GHz, 16GB, GTX 1070 

VDV

VDV

Posted
Posted
Oh, it's new to me that the real F/A-18 gets sucked down / pitches down at a very low altitude.

 

Hornet not sucked/pitches down...you're just a poor pilot. You need more practice and skill.

bbrz

bbrz

Posted
Posted
Hornet not sucked/pitches down...you're just a poor pilot. You need more practice and skill.

That's absolute nonsense. You are apparently simply unable to fly at e.g. 500kts and below 30ft.

i7-7700K 4.2GHz, 16GB, GTX 1070 

Wait4It

Wait4It

Posted
Posted

Please don't turn another thread into a mud throwing contest.

 

If you think something's wrong with the flight model, you can post a video or track to show it, so people can talk constructively.

Eldur

Eldur

Posted
Posted
Hornet not sucked/pitches down...you're just a poor pilot. You need more practice and skill.

 

Sounds like you never tried to do a Sierra Hotel pass over a runway at 10 ft dealwithit.png

 

But well, that's one of the "minor" issues the Hornet FM has, as well as those bomb racks with negative drag coefficients which allow her for going M 1.2+ on the deck without burners and LAU-115s with a cw that's literally over 9000 which on the other hoof restrict the max speed @ tropopause to like M 0.9 at full gate. It is early access after all, so it's something to expect. And actually, apart from some issues like the mentioned ones, the FM of the Hornet is by ages better than most of the 3rd party ones already.

dcsdashie-hb-ed.jpg

 

bbrz

bbrz

Posted
Posted (edited)
But won't you agree that these are very specific bugs, while the majority of the fm won't change much from where it is now?

I'm not aware that the question is about how much of the FM needs to be changed.

I would certainly don't call a bug 'very specific' if it's about basic aerodynamics, especially if it causes the F/A-18 to crash. The flare is also affected by this bug.

Edited by bbrz

i7-7700K 4.2GHz, 16GB, GTX 1070 

BuzzU

BuzzU

Posted
Posted
I'm not aware that the question is about how much of the FM needs to be changed.

I would certainly don't call a bug 'very specific' if it's about basic aerodynamics, especially if it causes the F/A-18 to crash. The flare is also affected by this bug.

 

If it's well known and reported. What's the point of this thread?

Buzz

Chops

Chops

Posted
  • Author
Posted

As one can see from the posts in this thread, there is a lot of misunderstanding, speculation, and confusion regarding the flight model. This is exactly why I started this thread in order to get official comment from Eagle Dynamics.

 

 

Lex and A.E.W have both stated in their YouTube videos that the flight model seems off. IvanK on this forum has stated similar sentiment and said that the developers are working on the flight model. All of these guys were real F-18 pilots.

 

 

There has only been one update to the flight model that I am aware of, which was back in June.

 

 

So, it would be really helpful if we could get official comment on what is going on with the flight model.

 

 

Everyone that has been flying the DCS F/A-18C needs to be aware that we have become conditioned to the current flight model, whether or not it is correct. Just because we have adjusted and compensated while flying the sim, does not mean that we can assume that it is correct or accurate.

 

 

 

- Thanks again

rrohde

rrohde

Posted
Posted
A Just because we have adjusted and compensated while flying the sim, does not mean that we can assume that it is correct or accurate.

 

 

Here's my concern:

 

Once the PFM is tuned to ED's best capabilities, it's been verified by SMEs and it's considered accurate and realistic, are we (as virtual armchair pilots) able stop nagging and question its validity and finally accept it for what it is and start training on it to master it, or will we - due to our lack of expertise/training/understanding continue to ask for the PFM to be changed until we're happy (even though the PFM ends up less than stellar or less than accurate)?

 

And when will we (defined as above) know and accept that the PFM is "done"?

 

I think it's really hard for ED to find the right stopping point here for everyone to be happy.

PC: AMD Ryzen 9 5950X | MSI Suprim GeForce 3090 TI | ASUS Prime X570-P | 128GB DDR4 3600 RAM | 2TB Samsung 870 EVO SSD | Win10 Pro 64bit

Gear: HP Reverb G2 | JetPad FSE | VKB Gunfighter Pro Mk.III w/ MCG Ultimate

 

VKBNA_LOGO_SM.png

VKBcontrollers.com

Nospin44

Nospin44

Posted
Posted

I agree with chops. I would like to hear more from the developers on the current flight model and whether they believe it is close enough or still much work. Like others have said Lex and AEW both stated the model still seems off.

Silver_Dragon

Silver_Dragon

Posted
Posted
As one can see from the posts in this thread, there is a lot of misunderstanding, speculation, and confusion regarding the flight model. This is exactly why I started this thread in order to get official comment from Eagle Dynamics.

 

 

Lex and A.E.W have both stated in their YouTube videos that the flight model seems off. IvanK on this forum has stated similar sentiment and said that the developers are working on the flight model. All of these guys were real F-18 pilots.

 

 

There has only been one update to the flight model that I am aware of, which was back in June.

 

 

So, it would be really helpful if we could get official comment on what is going on with the flight model.

 

 

Everyone that has been flying the DCS F/A-18C needs to be aware that we have become conditioned to the current flight model, whether or not it is correct. Just because we have adjusted and compensated while flying the sim, does not mean that we can assume that it is correct or accurate.

 

 

 

- Thanks again

 

Remember, the F/A-18C has on "anticipated access" release, that is not a final version, and meanwhile the PFM has on WIP. Take calm and wait for news.

For Work/Gaming: 28" Philips 246E Monitor - Ryzen 7 1800X - 32 GB DDR4 - nVidia RTX1080 - SSD 860 EVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 1 TB / 860 QVO 2 TB - Win10 Pro - TM HOTAS Warthog / TPR / MDF

David OC

David OC

Posted
Posted
Here's my concern:

 

Once the PFM is tuned to ED's best capabilities, it's been verified by SMEs and it's considered accurate and realistic, are we (as virtual armchair pilots) able stop nagging and question its validity and finally accept it for what it is and start training on it to master it, or will we - due to our lack of expertise/training/understanding continue to ask for the PFM to be changed until we're happy (even though the PFM ends up less than stellar or less than accurate)?

 

And when will we (defined as above) know and accept that the PFM is "done"?

 

I think it's really hard for ED to find the right stopping point here for everyone to be happy.

 

 

Yep,

 

Same with missile performance and logic.

 

Just wait till the F-16 is released.:cry: Oh man, the forum will be fun then....

i7-7700K OC @ 5Ghz | ASUS IX Hero MB | ASUS GTX 1080 Ti STRIX | 32GB Corsair 3000Mhz | Corsair H100i V2 Radiator | Samsung 960 EVO M.2 NVMe 500G SSD | Samsung 850 EVO 500G SSD | Corsair HX850i Platinum 850W | Oculus Rift | ASUS PG278Q 27-inch, 2560 x 1440, G-SYNC, 144Hz, 1ms | VKB Gunfighter Pro

Chuck's DCS Tutorial Library

Download PDF Tutorial guides to help get up to speed with aircraft quickly and also great for taking a good look at the aircraft available for DCS before purchasing. Link

bbrz

bbrz

Posted
Posted
What flare? You don't flare in the Hornet. Ever.

Where have you got this wrong info from?

Even the performance data section in the NATOPS manual mentions the increased landing distance when performing a flare.

i7-7700K 4.2GHz, 16GB, GTX 1070 

 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...