Forrestal SuperCarrier?

[Bronco]

I hope it will be migrated to SuperCarrier!!!!

 

Greetings

[Jester986]

The animated deck crew would be nice. I think heatblur has certainly delivered on what they promised so it’s not like they owe it to us imho but it would be nice. 

[Uxi]

Adding static shooters and green shirts in between cats 1 and 2 goes a long way.  Would prefer the animated crew come in,  but would be ok with it as is.  Just come out with Saratoga and Ranger or just let the current model put on livery with the right number and name maybe. 

 

What I really want for Supercarrier level is Enterprise. Maybe Nimitz and Ike.

[AG-51_Razor]

I'd love to see the PLAT cam available to us in the LSO position on the Forrestal! All the other SC features would be a huge bonus as well but like Jester said, I don't expect it but it would really be nice.

[dandan]

I want Forrestal with super carrier function，I hope Forrestal is not a ghost ship

Edited December 30, 2021 by dandan

[PhantomCat]

+1

[bies]

I guess it depends on ED and some business agreement.

It would be great though.

[Spurts]

Not going to happen.  SC is paid,  forestall is free.

[Silver_Dragon]

When ED complete the carrier API, has plausible HB and other 3rd parties, use them to add deck crew and other features.

[joey45]

Maybe IF they do the other carriers in the class they will have the SC treatment... And keep the Forrestal as the free one without like the Stennis.

[LanceCriminal86]

I'd rather the option to have them all with SC, or no SC functions, and have it simply swap the versions depending on if the SC module is purchased. That would be the ideal way to do it, let the 3rd parties add all the coordinates and locations to hook into the SC functions. If SC is bought, then it displays the SC crews and all that jazz.

[Silver_Dragon]

I'd rather the option to have them all with SC, or no SC functions, and have it simply swap the versions depending on if the SC module is purchased. That would be the ideal way to do it, let the 3rd parties add all the coordinates and locations to hook into the SC functions. If SC is bought, then it displays the SC crews and all that jazz.

No, the 3rd parties need build specific locations and zones depend of your module and adapt your module to work your functionality. That is not put o a bucanner the cockpit of a F/A-18c and the module working.

Enviado desde mi RNE-L21 mediante Tapatalk

[dandan]

I hope to realize the function of super aircraft carrier as soon as possible, and make CV60 super aircraft carrier. CV59 is free, and CV60 requires payment

[Charmin2105]

vor 6 Stunden schrieb dandan:

I hope to realize the function of super aircraft carrier as soon as possible, and make CV60 super aircraft carrier. CV59 is free, and CV60 requires payment

Isnt the stennis also SC now but only for those who owns it? Could be the same with the forrestal and possible other carriers

[Charmin2105]

vor 10 Stunden schrieb Бойовий Сокіл:

No. Stennis just got a new model.

When i choose the stennis i also have deck crew

[Swordsman422]

4 hours ago, Charmin2105 said:

When i choose the stennis i also have deck crew

Just tested this and can confirm. They must have done it quietly. I never saw them add it for SC users in the changelog.

[Charmin2105]

vor 5 Stunden schrieb Swordsman422:

Just tested this and can confirm. They must have done it quietly. I never saw them add it for SC users in the changelog.

Thats not long ago, but i cant tell, maybe 2 - 3 month. Since that i got the hope that we could get the SC functions also with the forrrestal.

[Silver_Dragon]

32 minutes ago, Charmin2105 said:

Thats not long ago, but i cant tell, maybe 2 - 3 month. Since that i got the hope that we could get the SC functions also with the forrrestal.

That need coming from HB size, no ED.

Edited December 4, 2022 by Silver_Dragon

[Charmin2105]

vor einer Stunde schrieb Silver_Dragon:

That need coming from HB size, no ED.

 

I dont know, on how much access 3rd Party Developer get on ED Content like the SC. If there is an API HB can use on the Forrestal, you're right otherwise its up to ED

[Silver_Dragon]

1 hour ago, Charmin2105 said:

I dont know, on how much access 3rd Party Developer get on ED Content like the SC. If there is an API HB can use on the Forrestal, you're right otherwise its up to ED

ED only build the API. The 3rd parties need build own features into your products.

[Spurts]

ED also has to release the API to the 3rd parties

[LanceCriminal86]

You keep throwing "API" around but it's a lot more than that. ED barely even shares the "new" missile "API" with HB, nevermind the unfinished state of the SC implementation for crew, elevators, parking, comms, and LSO/IFLOLS.

Yes, ED has implemented a way for the Stennis to be both SC and non-SC, which means yes, HB *COULD* add that on. But that isn't going to be done until the SC implementation/framework is more complete and nailed down, as the Forrestal itself likely needs to be "rigged" on the model side or have other reference points added and coordinates for crew, the ability to have unique/different crew skins to properly recognize the 80s-91 era of the Forrestal or later on for say the Sara, Indi, and Ranger, probably some kind of FLOLS instead of the IFLOLS of the more modern carriers, it would need internals added for the bridge/PriFly/Airboss, maybe even a briefing room skin. ED would have to have completed that themselves before a third party should even think about trying to add the same framework, and there would have to be some kind of documentation showing what is needed and how it would be done.

[Mr_sukebe]

How can you "barely share" something with someone.  Surely it's a bit binary, and either they do or they don't?

Hardly as though they'd be able to give them a bit of the API is it?

[LanceCriminal86]

Based on the previous discussions about the Phoenix, there is no API 'documentation', whitepaper, wiki, etc. as again it's still being worked internally by ED, but ED will sometimes provide values to use. The Phoenix may not even be 100% on the same "new" model as the AIM-120 if you peel further back.

[Indianajon]

Hi @IronMike, I know its been brought up before but i wonder if there is any news on a revised wake for the Forrestal? I love the model and enjoy landing on it but i have realised recently how much i depend on the wake for line up.

Ta