Military Assets for DCS by Currenthill

[Sport]

23 hours ago, currenthill said:

Military Asset Pack USA 1.1.8 released!
Changelog Version 1.1.8

• Fixed AGM-158B issue
• Fixed Ticonderoga CMP missile connector issue
• Fixed Ticonderoga missile connector issue

Distribution model

This Military Asset Pack is available in the following versions:

• The standard full download. Remove old asset pack version and unzip this in your Saved Games mods\tech folder.
• The incremental download which updates your full download and contains only the changed files. You apply it by overwriting your current installation.

 

 Military Asset Pack Ukraine 1.1.2 released!
Changelog Version 1.1.2

• Added BRDM-2 green Russian version
• Fixed ADM-160B issue

Distribution model

This Military Asset Pack is available in the following versions:

• The standard full download. Remove old asset pack version and unzip this in your Saved Games mods\tech folder.
• The incremental download which updates your full download and contains only the changed files. You apply it by overwriting your current installation.

Hey boss, so I've been having trouble updating the packs.  I downloaded the updated USA pack, installed it into the Mods/tech folder of my saved games file, but a bunch of the units are either missing completely or have no textures.  Not sure what's going on, but have you run into this before?

[CRUD]

5 hours ago, Sport said:

Hey boss, so I've been having trouble updating the packs.  I downloaded the updated USA pack, installed it into the Mods/tech folder of my saved games file, but a bunch of the units are either missing completely or have no textures.  Not sure what's going on, but have you run into this before?

You don't need to delete the old Pack, just add the new pack to it to the old one with a cut and paste

.

Edited May 13 by CRUD

[Sport]

Yep, understand that.  The issue is, DCS doesn't seem to be reading the updated entry.lua file for some reason.  For example, I went into the encyclopedia and checked to see which CH vehicles were loaded.  Its very few:

null

[SaitouJaga]

 I always thought that the right path is the folder in - c:\Users\Admin\Saved Games\DCS\Mods\tech\

 

But I have not seen either Centurion С-RAM or LAV-AD in the list of units for a long time. Perhaps some other units are not available, but I did not check each.

Edited May 13 by SaitouJaga

[rwbishUP]

I also have units missing textures after the latest update to USA 1.1.8 / Ukraine 1.1.2. The NASAMS 3 LAUNCHER AIM-9X-2 & NASAMS 3 LAUNCHER AMRAAM-ER.

Edited May 13 by rwbishUP

[Nick_17]

12 hours ago, Sport said:

 

The folder you are showing there lacks the ImagesGUI and Encyclopedia folder, which makes me believe that you did not replace the base pack files with the patch files. Or you have the base pack and patch separately in your tech folder, which would be wrong.

1. Download the base pack and place it in the tech folder.

2. Download the patch, drag and drop the contents into the base pack, and replace the files when prompted.

If done correctly and there are no conflicts with other mods, all units should show up in the Mission Editor. The historical filter/mode should be off as well.

[Abburo]

12 hours ago, Sport said:

Yep, understand that.  The issue is, DCS doesn't seem to be reading the updated entry.lua file for some reason.  For example, I went into the encyclopedia and checked to see which CH vehicles were loaded.  Its very few:

null

DCS Encyclopedia requires a different entry that the units you can see in ME. What I am trying to say is that is not relevant to look in Encyclopedia to find what is new/changed etc ... in general i mean, not only for mods. 

[Sport]

34 minutes ago, Nick_17 said:

The folder you are showing there lacks the ImagesGUI and Encyclopedia folder, which makes me believe that you did not replace the base pack files with the patch files. Or you have the base pack and patch separately in your tech folder, which would be wrong.

1. Download the base pack and place it in the tech folder.

2. Download the patch, drag and drop the contents into the base pack, and replace the files when prompted.

If done correctly and there are no conflicts with other mods, all units should show up in the Mission Editor. The historical filter/mode should be off as well.

Thanks for that! You were spot on.  I was unaware there was a main download and a patch required.

[CRUD]

3 hours ago, Sport said:

Thanks for that! You were spot on.  I was unaware there was a main download and a patch required.

Uh, that was what I said, I guess you're too clever for me...

[CRUD]

My current issue is I can't get CH's USA Infantry to load into helicopters.

[Babzo]

I'm having an issue where the USA assets arent showing up at all in the ME or in the encylopedia

[Shifty1]

Evening all, I downloaded from download link #4, installed in my tech folder. None of the current hill packs show up for me. It’s the right folder cause my plane mods show up. Am I missing something?

[Avimimus]

A suggestion: The 358 / Saqr would be very interesting. Getting accurate performance data might be difficult - but the idea of a slow LOAL loitering missile is fascinating. It'd be very interesting for helicopter pilots especially.

[Ramius007]

Great mods, nice to hear that large chunk will be added to DCS core, but I found small issue within Ukraine asset pack, Mig-29SM2 is very optimistic, from availbe data 29's should only carry Harms and some western GPS bombs on 2 inboard stations, ototh we have amraams and er/et on all pylons. Also, only was was modernized to this std...

[nghitran]

On 5/4/2025 at 6:31 PM, currenthill said:

 

That's correct. But also, the new DCS core assets will be completely unique from the mod packs. So there will be no issues if you don't update the mod packs immediately. No conflicts between the core assets and mod packs.

Is the Nulka system on Burke Flight III currently not working? Because after several tries, I only see Nulka working on Constellation.

[mangirose1125]

Each time I attempt to generate an Create Fast Mission, using any aircraft, the mission will not generate and I receive the following Msg, ""Mission Not Generated-invalid stoi argument"

when i make fast mission with CH Military Asset Pack China 1.1.4

[GKOver]

Is there a reason why I can’t make Iskander-M being shot from a SRB but I don‘t have any problems to shot Iskander-K from the GLCM?

Iskander-K: OK

Iskander-M: Not OK

Seems for me that missiles which are extremely fast can‘t be used…. 

 

I have found the reason by myself: I couldn‘t see the green line which shows me the minimum distance….

 

So the distance was still to near for firing the Iskander-M.

Edited May 18 by GKOver

[mangirose1125]

No matter how much I apply the mode, I don't see a list where I can create units once I get into the mission editor. I've asked chat gpt and tried everything, but it doesn't work. The installation path is also accurate. Someone help me, I'll upload the log. And I've deleted fxo, mission editor, metashadders2, and it's the same. Someone help me, please

dcs.log

[antiload]

7 hours ago, mangirose1125 said:

No matter how much I apply the mode, I don't see a list where I can create units once I get into the mission editor. I've asked chat gpt and tried everything, but it doesn't work. The installation path is also accurate. Someone help me, I'll upload the log. And I've deleted fxo, mission editor, metashadders2, and it's the same. Someone help me, please

dcs.log 116.24 kB · 3 downloads

Is this specific to Currenthill's mods? If it's a general question or issue it would be best in the mission editor or core section of the forum. Also give a little more detail, like can you create your own missions in the editor. I don't use the Quick mission so can't advise. If you want to add units to your own mission they're listed on the left hand side of the ME.

[Floyd1212]

I'm going to be honest, I did not read all 248 pages of this thread, but I did do a quick search for "S350" and didn't see anyone discussing the issue I am having...

Some of the people that fly in my helo squadron are experiencing FPS issues when looking in the direction of an S350 site.  The site is still 100km away, but frames drop to 10-15 fps when looking toward it, and come back to 60 fps when looking away from it.  More than one squad-mate have described this to me.

I don't see the same issue on my machine, but I have experienced issues after launching a Hellfire at the SR or STR from an Apache.  I can spot the radars in the TADS and lase them, and everything is fine.  But as soon as I rifle, my FPS drops to single digits for as long as the missile is in flight.  Then when it destroys the target, my frames are back to normal.

Anyone else experiencing FPS issues related to the S350 assets?

EDIT: The next post from SizzlepopBACON is from one of my squadron-mates having the issue...

Edited May 19 by Floyd1212

[SizzlepopBACON]

Hey yall sorry if this has been reported or asked about before, but I am not about to scroll through 250 pages of random stuff in hopes to find my question, which may not have even been asked before. Regardless, I'm having this weird issue with the Current Hill S350 assets where so much as having their location in my FOV will tank my fps down to unplayable levels. If I look away, fps goes back up. This happens even if the site is miles away behind mountains, where I would think the textures and graphics shouldn't be loaded... I haven't been able to get within eyesight of them because, like I said, unplayable fps even from miles away when looking at them. I'm not totally sure what's causing this... The obvious possibility is that loading their high quality textures and displaying them to too much for my poor computer, but given that this issue happens even when I can't actually see the units, just are looking in their general direction, I feel that's unlikely. In addition, this issue seems to only exist with the S350 units. All other CH units do not exhibit this issue... Is this a known bug? If it is, any suggestions on how to alleviate the symptoms? (OTHER than just not looking at them, which is not a very good solution lol). If it is a new issue that's not been reported, feel free to respond with whatever questions you may have. ED still hasn't fixed their <profanity>ty replay system so sadly I can't attach one. Well, not one that works... I have attached my dcs log file for the flight. Every few mins (I think every time I look in the direction of the S350) I'll get huge lists of the same error "ERROR   ED_SOUND (Main): invalid host position(Shell-n) : [x, y, z]" so maybe that has something to with it? Thanks

dcs.log

Edited May 19 by SizzlepopBACON

[mangirose1125]

Even if you put it in the correct path, it won't open when you get into the mission editor, and you can't create the unit itself. And I've tried reinstalling it, but it doesn't work. Even if you download the fa-18 Super Hornet mode on the mission editor, it won't pop up. Same goes for f-15ex

[razo+r]

8 minutes ago, mangirose1125 said:

Even if you put it in the correct path, it won't open when you get into the mission editor, and you can't create the unit itself. And I've tried reinstalling it, but it doesn't work. Even if you download the fa-18 Super Hornet mode on the mission editor, it won't pop up. Same goes for f-15ex

Turn off the historical filter (the watch/clock icon at the bottom in the editor).

[CRUD]

Dern shame we can't Air Assault mixed squads in one unit.  Have to separate them as units, even with the vanilla units.

[CarbonFox]

Regarding the SM-6. I noticed it makes a shallower climb when compared to the SM-2MR which seems to have a higher loft profile upon launch from either the Ticonderoga or the Burke, gaining altitude much quicker. The SM-6 just seems to fly straight towards its target rather than try to get the most range by climbing into thinner air quicker. Wasn't sure if this is intended or a bug.

Edited May 20 by CarbonFox