Dimebag1 Posted February 11, 2011 Posted February 11, 2011 Maybe we can get Julian Assange to ask one of his sources to 'intercept' the bank statements from the USAF, and look for any payments to ED. E.g. $10,000,000 --------------- ED, f-15e simulator. $100,000,000,000 --------- Air force running costs $1,000,000 ----------------- Toilet paper $50,000,000 --------------- Dry cleaning and starching. $30,000,000 --------------- Runway scraper wages [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
Weta43 Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 (edited) This isn't a bad model either ... Jet, vaguely multi-role if you're a bit short of fast movers.. (think Falklands) Simillar kind of level of sensor suite / weapons to those currently modelled ... Carrier ops ... The AV-8B Harrier II Plus carries the following weapons systems and technologies: A 25mm rapid-fire Gatling gun Air-to-air weapon systems: Heat-seeking Sidewinder missiles AIM-120 advanced medium range air-to-air missile (AMRAAM), which is a beyond-visual-range missile Air-to-surface weapon systems: Digital targeting data link Global positioning system Litening II Targeting Pod system Next-generation, precision-guided munitions, including the joint direct attack munition (JDAM) Sea Eagle anti-ship missile from MBDA Fair amount of cross over from DCS.A10C - They'd have to do the APG-65 radar system & AIM-120, but they have to do radar some time... ( & the Combat Radius of 560 km) fits the current map pretty well & makes for nice short missions :-) or (& just in case anyone's getting excited - I have no more idea than you :-) Edited February 12, 2011 by Weta43 Cheers.
slug88 Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 This isn't a bad model either ... And that comment by "eagledcs" is certainly interesting, isnt it? :D:D:D Does (unreal) mean that's impossible to take off vertical or will it be possible in one of the next patches? unreal yet! =) [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]
HungaroJET Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 This isn't a bad model either ... Howbout' this ? http://milviz.com/modeldetail.php?type=1&id=AV-8B# or this ? http://milviz.com/modeldetail.php?type=1&id=F-111F :thumbup: Atop the midnight tarmac, a metal beast awaits. To be flown below the radar, to bring the enemy his fate. HAVE A BANDIT DAY ! [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] "When I'm working on a problem, I never think about beauty. I think only how to solve the problem. But when I have finished, if the solution is not beautiful, I know it is wrong." - R. Buckminster Fuller (1895 - 1983), American Architect, Author, Designer, Inventor, and Futurist
celticcoho Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 (edited) OK enough already!!!!You all have joy sticks and a monitor, Next DCS is the Predator Drone!!!Choose your Config, Cameras, weapons, etc and go fly it from 2500 miles away via satalite..:megalol: No Spying on the GF..or Neighbor, thats just wrong!! Edited February 12, 2011 by celticcoho [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC]Celticcoho (OriginFreedom) WIN 7 64 bit, I7975 at 3.6ghz,X58 Classified 3 Mobo, 6gb Corsair 2000 ram, 2 ea ATI 5870 Eyefinity 6 2gb's , 27" Ultra Sharp,(main view), 3 23"touch screens , Tm Warthog, Saitek Combat Pedals Track IR 5,:D JIM.:book:
Steel Jaw Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 So who'd want an F-14 sim? The Iranians? A sim is the only way they will ever get to fly Tomcats again...kinda lost access to all the spare parts and Grumman support after the Shah got booted out. :D "You see, IronHand is my thing" My specs: W10 Pro, I5/11600K o/c to 4800 @1.32v, 64 GB 3200 XML RAM, Red Dragon 7800XT/16GB, monitor: GIGABYTE M32QC 32" (31.5" Viewable) QHD 2560 x 1440 (2K) 165Hz.
Weta43 Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 Howbout' this ? http://milviz.com/modeldetail.php?type=1&id=AV-8B# or this ? http://milviz.com/modeldetail.php?type=1&id=F-111F __________________ Nice, but not posted by E.D. on their youtube channel so maybe not so relevant ... Cheers.
Krippz Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 I think, it`s a simple. Matt Wagner worked for EA Jane’s Combat Simulations team (proof: http://www.rockpapershotgun.com/2009/01/18/matt-wagner-on-black-shark/ and http://www.migman.com/sw/FA18_Janes/links.php ) , and he has co-created Jane`s F/A-18. He knows this plane, he has experience with this type of the plane. And I think, if they ( Jane`s team with Matt Wagner on board) have bought a license first time for the Jane`s F/A-18 Hornet, they would not any problems to purchase this license again for ED (believe me, a license = a luxury merchandise, a big money and an hours of negotiations). Matt did it a few years ago. ED have all, what is need. What for new problems with other plane? Best regards for All!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IF ED does a F/A-18 it's going to be the Echo version as VRS did this with a 2 man team, no reason why ED and it's competent employees couldn't be able to surpass the quality of the VRS title (which is phenomenal I might add). But we are all speculating aren't we :smilewink:; I still think it's going to be a F-16 :music_whistling: [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] 64th "Scorpions" Aggressor Squadron Discord: 64th Aggressor Squadron TS: 195.201.110.22
Blaze Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 :music_whistling: i7 7700K | 32GB RAM | GTX 1080Ti | Rift CV1 | TM Warthog | Win 10 "There will always be people with a false sense of entitlement. You can want it, you can ask for it, but you don't automatically deserve it. "
LukeSky Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 Exactly, thin air is where the fighters fly! :D Gimme one good candidate, that isn't fighter / multirole. (except that agricultural thing, EtherealN brings up all the time) hmmm.... the B-2 [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Windows 7 64bit, Core I7 950, Nvidia GTX 260, 6 gig RAM, TIR 5, Saitek Pro Flight Rudder Pedals, Logitech attack3 :(
BoneDust Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 This isn't a bad model either ... Agree. :) Alienware New Aurora R15 | Windows® 11 Home Premium | 64bit, 13thGen Intel(R) Core(TM) i9 13900KF(24-Core, 68MB| NVIDIA(R) GeForce RTX(TM) 4090, 24GB GDDR6X | 1 X 2TB SSD, 1X 1TB SSD | 64GB, 2x32GB, DDR5, 4800MHz | 1350W PSU, Alienware Cryo-tech (TM) Edition CPU Liquid Cooling power supply | Pimax Crystal VR
LukeSky Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 As I've mentioned in a different thread, For ED it's almost a no brainer, producing an F-16 module will put the final stamp on the death of Falcon4 on all of its variations. A mass hoarding of the Viper community will commence bringing not only many more faces but alot of money. Even the most dedicated F4 player acknowledges the high fidelity of the DCS series (Ka-50 & A-10) and this is the exact thing they are looking for. Some of them are already here for the A-10. I might be wrong but this is just my opinion. I wouldn't mind having the F-16, F-15, F-18 or even an F-4 or an F-14. Or any other fixed wing for that matter! ED continues to amaze me with their products and I will gladly spend my money on them! :) You're right (for me at least). I didn't touched FF5 since the blackshark release. Damn, shame on me. it was really a good sim. [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Windows 7 64bit, Core I7 950, Nvidia GTX 260, 6 gig RAM, TIR 5, Saitek Pro Flight Rudder Pedals, Logitech attack3 :(
LukeSky Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 http://www.thebattlesim.com/index.php?end_pos=3&scr=newslist&lang=en Best I can do for you :P It cannot take off from the CNV-70. Am I cold or hot? [sIGPIC][/sIGPIC] Windows 7 64bit, Core I7 950, Nvidia GTX 260, 6 gig RAM, TIR 5, Saitek Pro Flight Rudder Pedals, Logitech attack3 :(
msalama Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 (edited) Well call me all shades of a nutjob under the sun if you must, but I'd actually buy a DCS C-130 or some such (military) cargo hauler in a heartbeat because I've always wanted to operate a decently-modelled heavy myself. Now I understand this most likely won't happen because releasing one would probably be very un-prudent commercially, but one can always hope still :music_whistling: I've never been a fighter guy myself and would therefore love to see f.ex. a Hind released after the Hog, but will I still buy whatever it is they model next? Of course I bloody will, because what these blokes have here is a quality venture deserving of all possible support. Endy story! Edited February 12, 2011 by msalama The DCS Mi-8MTV2. The best aviational BBW experience you could ever dream of.
Bucic Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 (except that agricultural thing, EtherealN brings up all the time) I'm of peasant descent and I can assure you that this is NOT an agricultural thing :D F-5E simpit cockpit dimensions and flight controls Kill the Bloom - shader glow mod Poor audio Doppler effect in DCS [bug] Trees - huge performance hit especially up close
71st_Mastiff Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 If it's either the F-16 or the F-18 I Will still buy both! :thumbup: "any failure you meet, is never a defeat; merely a set up for a greater come back", W Forbes. "Success is not final, failure is not fatal, it is the courage to continue that counts", "He who never changes his mind, never changes anything," Winston Churchill. MSI z690 MPG DDR4 || i9-14900k|| ddr4-128gb PC3200 |zotac RTX 5080|Game max 1300w|Win11| |turtle beach elite pro 5.1|| ViRpiL,T50cm2||MFG Crosswinds|| VT50CM-plus rotor Throttle || G10 RGB EVGA Keyboard/MouseLogitech || PiMax Crystal VR || 32 Asus||
scheffchen Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 Quote from the Battle Simulator homepage: "Currently nine flyable aircraft (A-10A, F-15C, Su-27, MiG-29, MiG-29, Su-25, Su-25T, Su-33, Ka-50) with more under development (F-16, F/A-18 )" http://www.thebattlesim.com/index.php?end_pos=9&scr=list&lang=en Now the chances are 50:50... Have a great weekend. Ill go skiing in laax/switzerland for the next days. :) Scheffchen 9900k, 2080TI, 64GB, ssd, valve index, Thrustmaster on virpil, virpil cm2 throttle, tpr pedals, mfd.
Ghillied raptor Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 Quote from the Battle Simulator homepage: "Currently nine flyable aircraft (A-10A, F-15C, Su-27, MiG-29, MiG-29, Su-25, Su-25T, Su-33, Ka-50) with more under development (F-16, F/A-18 )" http://www.thebattlesim.com/index.php?end_pos=9&scr=list&lang=en Now the chances are 50:50... Have a great weekend. Ill go skiing in laax/switzerland for the next days. :) Scheffchen Either way it's a win-win for me. I do wish that they would put in harriers though, it would be quite fitting.
Cedaway Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 OK, we've got 50-50 between F-16 and F-18. Who want to maker a poll? What a trolling thread! DCS Wish: Turbulences affecting surrounding aircraft... [sIGPIC] [/sIGPIC] Gigabyte GA-Z170-HD3P - Intel Core i5 6600K - 16Gb RAM DDR4-2133 - Gigabyte GeForce GTX 1080 G1 Gaming - 8 Go - 2 x SSD Crucial MX300 - 750 Go RAID0 - Screens: HP OMEN 32'' 2560x1440 + Oculus Rift CV1 - Win 10 - 64bits - TM WARTHOG #889 - Saitek Pro Rudder.
evilnate Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 Exciting stuff! Can't help to speculate, but if it were a F18 with carrier ops I hope they can simulate a rocking ship with bad weather! Rough carrier landings without the RL consequences sound like fun to me. If it's some other AC I will still be stoked :)
Blaze Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 OK, we've got 50-50 between F-16 and F-18. Who want to maker a poll? What a trolling thread! Yeah sure, make another pointless poll that ED isn't going to give a rats-ass about because they've already started on the project and aren't going to change their minds. :P 1 i7 7700K | 32GB RAM | GTX 1080Ti | Rift CV1 | TM Warthog | Win 10 "There will always be people with a false sense of entitlement. You can want it, you can ask for it, but you don't automatically deserve it. "
joey45 Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 This isn't a bad model either ... Jet, vaguely multi-role if you're a bit short of fast movers.. (think Falklands) Simillar kind of level of sensor suite / weapons to those currently modelled ... Carrier ops ... Fair amount of cross over from DCS.A10C - They'd have to do the APG-65 radar system & AIM-120, but they have to do radar some time... ( & the Combat Radius of 560 km) fits the current map pretty well & makes for nice short missions :-) or (& just in case anyone's getting excited - I have no more idea than you :-) What other planes don't have radar.. and the combat radius would be good for the map. 1 The only way to make sense out of change is to plunge into it, move with it, and join the dance. "Me, the 13th Duke of Wybourne, here on the ED forums at 3 'o' clock in the morning, with my reputation. Are they mad.." https://ko-fi.com/joey45
SEwhiteG Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 If I remember correctly (it was long time ago) you have said same when LO2 was coming out :) Servers aren't empty today :) Yea yea:music_whistling: I flying because we have russian planes in LO2. But now we have a situation that after a10c will come out another american aircraft. I think that there is not dynamics in that. If the first plane was a10c, then the second plane should be russian striker. Now we'll have the situation that we have two american planes, and no russian. What will do now people who fly only russian aircraft? Did we have to wait another five years for russian plane so we can fly too. It's not fair that the blue guys will fly and red will drive tanks.
winz Posted February 12, 2011 Posted February 12, 2011 What will do now people who fly only russian aircraft? They will have plenty time to think about how silly attitude that is ;) 1 The Valley A-10C Version Revanche for FC 3
Recommended Posts