All Activity

By the way, a mini review of the campaign has appeared. Hats off to you for that much text and of course, describing impressions. Thanks!

Hey guys, I honestly missed this thread because I'm following the main thread about the campaign. Thank you so much for such a kind review , and I'm very glad you enjoyed the campaign and that it provided a great experience for the "virtual" KW pilot. The module definitely deserves an interesting campaign, so I think this is a pretty good addition. I'm also drawing some conclusions for the future as well. Thanks again for the feedback!

1. Set the Max. Frame rate in DCS to 60 FPS (it is always better to set it to the same FPS that you use in Opentrack). 2. Enable AMD FreeSync Premium in the Display settings of the Adrenalin UI (it limits the monitor frequency to the FPS rate of the game) 3. Optional: Enable Frame Rate Target Control in the Graphics Settings of the Adrenalin UI (problaby not necessary anymore since DCS has its own FPS limiter) 4. Optional: Set the Max. FPS to 60 in the Graphics Settings of the Adrenalin UI (it is the value below No. 3) 5. Remove the Optiscaler, not sure how exactly it works but to have an additional layer that needs performance and process time is never a good idea if you already have performance issues 6. Set Anti Aliasing in DCS to MSAA and MSAA to 4x 7. Deactivate the Game Bar and the Game Mode in Settings -> Gaming in Windows

Yeah, this is what confuses me. Is there really that much of a difference when using Nvidia over AMD? DCS becomes unplayable in multiplayer at high settings for me, while comparable cards (like 1080) can easily do that and more. I feel like it might be a VRAM issue more than anything. I can easily get 100 fps in single player at medium-high settings when VRAM usage is usually in the 3-4GB range. In multiplayer, however, it seems to overflow immediately (even at low settings) and kill my fps with the exception of really small servers. Page file is at 40GB. I don’t notice a difference with vsync. It is possible that Adrenalin could be causing issues, but I have most features turned off in it. I’ve used 3DMark and seen no issues with my card.

As a nVidia card owner, I find this sad and ridiculous. It is ironic on how much neglect there is on nVidia for VRAM on newer cards and DCS eats VRAM like there is no tomorrow. "Most benchmarks" features games that run on consoles. Your card has only 8gb of VRAM. Try to look at a hardware resource monitor to see if your VRAM is the bottleneck.

Thanks a lot for your feedback gentlemen. There was indeed a pair of triggers that weren't seperated cleanly enough and could lead to the mission stalling after setting the (parking) brake (basically swallowing the step with the starter switch). I uploaded a hotfix and updated the uploaded campaign file already. I also attached the corrected mission here. My apologies for the inconveniences. Cheers Carsten CG_Corsair_School_M01_Cold Start.miz

Please show me where I hurled insults.

Yes, that's right. I could have started my own thread dedicated to the updated VPC Mod, but felt it would have been a disrespect to the author of this Mod, so I never did that, instead directing people to my post only.

Так еще нет в продаже самого комплекта?

Update guys Pimax play installed, Asset added... I try to start DCS from play asset link and it boots up in front of me but not connecting the Super. Im left looking at stars an planets This is my link where I normally launch from .. G:\Eagle Dynamics\DCS World OpenBeta\bin and I have tried the Binmt exe too..G:\Eagle Dynamics\DCS World OpenBeta\bin-mt Dont have any other exe files set up for years Any ideas please?? Regards

That sounds like a good start. Do you know if the devs started monitoring this forum? There have been a few additional reports accumulating here.

Correct. Visual Reporting Points that I placed based on RW coordinates are also in the correct locations.

Mah... acquistare ormai da una terza parte pare un terno al lotto... da veao, a razbam... non c'è due senza tre, qualcuno di voi lo acquista?

You want me to pin the above link in the first post? No problem, can do. Any additional explanations I should add to it? No, wait. You weren’t talking about this appreciation thread, were you? But the Airfield equipment thread, right?

Try it here https://www.mediafire.com/file/lsg7yp19vqtgpz0/J-35A.rar/file

That‘s my plan as well. We will see how it goes. I‘m looking forward to any release of manuals and/or supporting documents.

Just look which brand pops up when starting DCS. Hint: It's not AMD. Unfortunately, DCS focuses on DLSS and DLAA while neglecting newer FSR versions and there are no plans to integrate the latter. There's probably a cooperation with Nvidia of some kind. I had a 1080 until recently and it was totally fine with medium to high settings on 1440p, so much higher settings than yours. Despite not supporting DLSS/DLAA. I mean the SC on a heavy multiplayer session IS challenging, no doubt. But you should at least get 30+ FPS and no stuttering. The only differences I had were the lower preload radius, MSAA 2x and I also used Vsync and a max. FPS of 80 (which I never achieved anyway). Everything else, I had set higher. Have you set up your page file correctly for your 64GB of RAM? Have you tried Vsync? Have you some kind of cards settings that override the ingame settings? And have you tried a benchmark like HeavenBenchmark (it's free) to look if it's a general problem or a DCS problem?

To me the movements look a bit jerky, unlike a plane. I fly real warbirds, aerobatics and do dogfight simulations, real life movements are smoother , with that being said , I have never tried a motion rig myself, would love to try one and hopefully like it. VR flight sim guy, I dont believe anything he says, everything is amazing awesome until the next thing comes out.

Throwing insults instead of engaging with the problem just shows you’ve got nothing useful to say. This is the last reply you will get from me.

I expect ED to shoot some of not all the ideas down. I'm going to go over each one. First paid ATC- ATC should be part of DCS core this is the type of thing that would really cause problems online. Improved terrain- most maps are already paid DLC. Wether or not people are willing to buy upgrades of stuff they already own comes down to cost and what they get. I could see a lot of interest in buying an expanded Pascific map that includes the Marianas (provided it won't melt your CPU) as well as an expanded Caucuses map using a set up like Afganistan where everyone gets access to a low detail map for online games. I could also see the same deal working for the Nevada map- make the expanded version the US South West which ideally would ideally include Fallon, Mirimar, and Holloman. If the developers could coordinate ED a massive Mid east map would be awesome. The idea for the mega mideast map would be ED would work on a very small strip around each map Dynamic campaign- I could see this going either way. I believe ED wants to make this part of DCS core, the main argument against doing it this way is I think it would have been done a lot sooner. As long as you don't need the dynamic campaign to connect to a server with a dynamic campaign running I don't see any issues.

The modern Carrier and wingman audio kills the WW2 immersion. An era-specific update would be appreciated. AI should make it far easier, without the need for voice actors.

I'm not trolling. I'm just amused by some of the issues you're reporting here. This is Russian equipment from the 1980s, and that's how it worked. It's like the behavior of a child who needs everything handed to them on a plate because if something requires a little more effort, it's definitely broken. Cheers.

See attached files. After practicing som t/o and landings, i noticed that the arresting hook was gone, i suspect from damage? However, it continues to work. corsair broken hook.trk

A naval F4 from HeatBlur would be amazing.