All Activity

BIOS, Nividia drivers and Windows all up to date. Ran a test this morning before updating the Nvidia drivers. Prior to Nvidia update and HT support OFF - Desktop to main menu > 42 seconds Exit to Desktop > 5 seconds After Nvidia update and HT support ON - Desktop to main menu > 70 seconds Exit to Desktop > 40 seconds I don't claim to know what the problem is but there does seem to be a link between Multi/Hyper threading and DCS load times.

A little earlier in this thread, the developer (Rudel) acknowledged a problem and said it’s on their bug list. That’s an interesting observation that the problems between the modules seem similar. Earlier in this thread, Rudel mentioned that DCS models tailwheels, not as a rolling wheel, but as a stick touching the ground. In that case, it should have a fairly limited amount of variables that could be tweaked. That made me think the problem could be as simple as an incorrect “friction” value applied to the point of the stick that touches the ground. I would imagine there aren’t many more variables if the tailwheel is modeled as a stick. Maybe the angle of incidence of the stick, based on its length and where it attaches to the fuselage. Who knows though, I’m just taking guesses on limited understanding of coding. In any case, this makes me think the problem is simple, and that resolving it could be as simple as making the tail-stick contact point more “slippery” . When a castering tailwheel is unlocked, the friction forces that resist the tail from freely swinging all the way aroundis minimal. In the sim, the friction imparted by the stick’s contact point should be consistent with the rolling resistance of a small tail-wheel rolling on the ground.

I would think that a partnership with beyond atc or SayIntentionsAi is probably the optimum ED could do. Implement an API that opens this aspect up to third party devs. Their solutions are 90% there already with absolutely stunning results! In 2026 this really is a must have or this whole project feels like Windows NT in 2020.

Yes. I had everything with Buk-M3 in name spawned :). May I ask you to send me a mission with properly working BUK site?

Or appreciate the options to make it easier for all to access at a level that is comfortable to them.

...are using Metric but Mig29G is using Imperial... Only thing I must do now is to change the module to be avail on 'Combined Joint Task Forces' and I'll have Imp's on my hud P.S. The rest of you with useless opinions...don't waste my time any more, would you?!

Hi all I have used these twice since buying them so in mint condition Please join the Specter Studio Discord and ping me if interested https://discord.gg/uxGCqZx8 £120 o.n.o

They originally used a synthesized voice I believe, before some squadron got a radio personality to re record the lines Points are just like a pre set. Once you make a point, you can use it for aerodrome, waypoint, or beacon. It’s just a convenience thing so you have a pool of points to assign to whatever without needing to make new ones for each tab.

Соглашусь. Так, мне стали важнее органы управления, чем VR. После проф деформации яркие визуальные спец эффекты уходят на второй план. Наверное.

There is alcohol to cool the radar…..

А металл покрашеный серой матовой краской выглядит по другому? Вам никто не мешает открыть фотошоп и перерисовать свои текстуры. НЕ понял причем тут вообще пластмассовая кабина и радиообмен?) А я знаю релаьных действующих лётчиков которые приходят в ДКС, при этом и летают по инструкциям (ИПП, РЛЭ и тд) и радиообмен ведут в SRS со всеми спецэфектами и правильной фразеологией.

Thanks again for the clarification — that really helps to put things into perspective. Makes sense that it depends so much on the bogey’s altitude and the terrain background. The example with a target at angels 25 vs. angels 10 with mountains really illustrates the difference well. Good to know that Jester already scans ±10,000 ft by default (Zabuzard) , so I don’t need to micromanage him there. That simplifies things a lot. I’ll definitely keep boresight mode in mind for closer visual-range situations. Appreciate you taking the time to explain this

This is still planned to be done, sorry I dont have a timeline right now.

I just tried this mission,and looks like their is a small fleet in that area(In my run I saw at least 4 ships in the area,and ships in that fleet are in loose formation,every ships are like few km away),with fog in that mission it's easy to miss the right ship........I almost missed it,when the "we got visual of u" message from frigate was triggered,I was flying passing a missile boat......but after circling around a bit more I eventually found the correct frigate with helipad... are u sure u didn't miss the right ship in the bad weather?

Except weather changes - on some days drastically, as the day progresses. This is not reflected by ED's weather as of yet.

Das sollte releativ gut gehen. Du kannst der Drohne im Menü vorgeben welche Ziele sie markieren soll. Welche Waffen dafür und wenn ich jetzt nicht komplett daneben liege sogar die Reihenfolge. Ich habe so etwas mal gebaut und es hat super bei 10 Zielen geklappt. Kann das gern nochmal nachschauen, wenn ich die Misison noch finde ist schon ein oder zwei Jährchen her

I think it's safe to say we wish for ED to deliver on their promises, and what's listed on the store page: The most realistic model of the F-16C imaginable, down to each bolt and flake of paint, animated controls surfaces, lights, damage model, and landing gear.

IRL? That makes no sense. Metric is SI and used by 96% of the world population, and even the US is (very slowly) converting to metric - finally.

Thanks for confirming the issue. If you want to also confirm, that it's not specifically a two carrier issue, more specifically its an issue of the carrier not being in the #1 slot. As mentioned above, to test that was by placing an Arleigh Burke as the #1 ship and had the same issues. Too not again as well, this isn't a problem with the modern carriers or Super Carriers, which I had also tested with the Hornet and Tomcat (the only other two Navy birds I have). I have only had and was able to replicate the issue with the Essex.

Same, but I'm not sure how that'll work out with the login. Do you have any experience with that? Can you keep playing offline (I mean without account login) indefinitely?

Im still testing this. I dont use necksafer. Ive had no crashes with HL Alyx or DCS after totally removing all pimax software then putting the PC in safemode and deleting all the leftover pimax folders (I couldnt delete one because it said a file was still in use so thats why safemode) I installed 4.42.1 and made no changes everything stock settings in pimax and as much as possible in DCS. So far I have about 3 flights with about 3 hrs no issues at all with crashing. Ill try to make changes slowly over time and see if any problems pop back up.

Thank you!

yes, its totally true and I intend to save a full dcs install just to run the mirage 2000 and the harrier, even if I have to purchase a second ssd drive to keep it, and freeze it to never update. it can be kept for ever, but just note that whatever module or map is released after you freeze that dcs install, wont be available to run in that dcs. But I don’t mind, I intend to keep two dcs installs side by side just to be able to keep using my 3 remaining Razbam modules ( the F-15E was refunded a while back ).

I have made an internal report for the team. thank you

Thank you, I will make a improvement request to the team. I am not sure what can be done yet, so can not make any promises. But I think we should consider reducing speed for external loads, I will ask the team if this is possible.