All Activity

i started this thread way back in 2021...and the ffb is still not fixed? That's insane

I haven't flown this bird since it first came out and the ffb was really messed up. Seeing as I only have a ffb stick I put the plane back into the hangar. Anyone with a ffb stick know if they've finally brought it up to snuff in any of the latest updates? Thanks

https://forum.dcs.world/topic/365842-a-10cii-quick-mission-jtac-inop/#comment-5692049

There's some trial and error with positioning/angling the 2D plane within OpenKneeBoard. Then start with something like our grid in KneeboardFiles.zip above. With the grid there, you can more easily figure out how your final 2D plane needs to be shaped. Hope that makes sense.

I’ve read the thread title, the thread, and the OPs clarification of what was intended in original post. I believe I’m in total agreement with your understanding of the thread’s focus. As the thread progressed, it became clear that differential braking wasn’t the cause of the problem as some proposed. Differential braking just revealed how inaccurate the tailwheel was behaving. This is because in real life, a short jab on differential brakes would lead any taildragger to swing the tail around with it’s own momentum. So that said, it’s fair to say diff braking isn’t the cause, but a good way to *demonstrate* how badly the tailwheel steering is acting . Please understand I’m not claiming any policing authority when I say the following. Crosswinds cannot be a contributing factor to the problem when there are no crosswinds. However, it stands to reason that if the tailwheel doesn’t steer as expected in zero-wind, it will be even worse with crosswinds. That’s why I think we can conclude that crosswind behavior is a symptom, not a contributing factor to the cause. After the tailwheel behavior is fixed, then it becomes possible to assess if crosswinds are unduly affecting ground handling. And if that’s the case, then it would be clear the problem is related to aerodynamic modeling, (because the core physics modeling of tailwheel has been fixed)

I definitely prefer my PSVR2 over my old Reverb G2. If I had a Quest Pro I wouldn't have needed to move away from WMR so I'd probably still be using it. But we're comparing a $1500 headset from 2022 with a $550 one from 2023. What I'd really like to see is a comparison with Quest 3 now that PSVR2 can run at higher Super Sampling with DFR I don't see the PSVR2 as cheap, either. The halo setup is ideal IMO and the gasket is awesome. It blocks light extremely well without any pressure. I find it alot more comfortable than the Reverb G2. The reason we get the PSVR2 so cheap right now is the PS5 community didn't buy many - possibly because it cost more than the console itself - and Sony dumped it on the PC market after a couple of years of poor sales. Ultimately neither headset achieved the success their manufacturers hoped for, but they're both interesting options at 2025 prices. Anyway, I guess this is all off topic. DFR works, and works really well!

Спасибо кажется я разобрался. А индикатор видимо у меня горел из-за того что я заменил баки на стоянке, бак сняли, но другой ещё не поставили. Извините что ввёл вас в заблуждение. Но что тогда означает Б1 в Б2 на топливомере? Это две полоски Б1 и Б2 всегда заполнены одинаково. Неужели это правая и левая группа баков? И можно ли сбросить только внешние подвенэ баки если они выработались. Или только все сразу.

Если из красных Ми-24 из Синих F-4 и "Кот". Качество текстур кокпита "кота" (они кстати +- в тойже цветовой гамме, что и у мига) уже по первым трейлерам было видно, а это 6 лет назад на минуточку

I built my F-14A in 1/72 scale, so, uhmmmm... I did nothing and left it clear.

As fascinating as the Yak-38 is, I really can't see it coming to DCS, never mind being some sort of 'saviour' for it. I suspect that finding adequate documentation would be problematic, and its operational capabilities seem to have been rather limited.

@-Cipher- Thanks .trk file. Yup, on your plane trim is sensitive, just like it used to be mine. I've attached mine, you can see how stable the plane is even if I move the trim from one extreme to another. What kind of setting should I have for FF? I've checked what I have for "Elevator Trim - axis" in FF Tune, and I have exactly the same stuff as for all other axes that work just fine. P51D-useless-elevator-trim.trk

I've tried it and unfortunately it's not for me. I am sending it back. I am not saying it's bad headset and it will be a good upgrade for many users. However, I think the Quest Pro is a better option IF you can get one for a decent price. I paid £300 for my mine. I was lucky to get such a good deal for a mint headset that had hardly been used. There are still some bargains.

we clearly have a different meaning for the word "stolen"

Well it occurred to me that Lazur could be faked to some degree with new navigation by spawning/de-spawning RBSN car. (not fully, but HSI would behave similar to the way Mig-21 behaves with Lazur)

I just hit it off overnight and can't remember - I last did the process last year or so on Kola after an update since it's a once it's done it's done sorta thing - also used the f10 to bring it into combat flite via QGIS / transform files Since the F10 is rendered on demand, you have to sleep for a bit between setting the camera position and taking the screenshot to pre render - the screenshot collection is of course the main time sink but is a one time thing

I'd rather have a Mystère IVB or SMB2 for the Sinai campaign and subsequent military operations in the Levant. These would fit well with the current lineup of MiG-15, 7 and 19 and F-86 and F-100

Как, например, где? Если можно, то со скринами.

checked your track and the coordinates reported by JTAC are correct. WE02530543. Try a slow repair, maybe a file broken. Your uploaded Mission is missing a JTAC.

That's my old config, check a few posts later. Something is very strange on your end. You have set 150% now and the SS resolution is 5872x5992 ??? That is crazy high, before that 160% was ~3200x3200... (???) You may have bricked your VR render pipeline somewhere in your system sometime ago. Something is messing with your settings. I'm into VR for 11 years now, always looking to get the best out of it. The PSVR2 is one of the most color correct headsets i've seen. Also very powerful with brightness and contrast (it can do HDR so no wondering here). And it's a relieve to see OLEDs in action again after years with LCD headsets. Sure QLED in the QP is not that bad when it comes to similarities in image quality, but these PSVR2 OLEDs absolutely shine in VR.

Not going to lie I learned originally in metric when doing flight Sims flying German and Russian planes in IL-2, and then with the MiG-21 and MiG-15 as my first planes in DCS, and I actually prefer flying metric. However for the Mi-24P I had the labels in English for the first couple of weeks to help rapidly learn her. Then when I had it down I switched back to Cyrilic. I'll probably do the same for the MiG-29. Sorry learning morse code, and nautical flags are the first 2 side quests on my SIM agenda. Cyrilic is a distant third.

It's by Grinnelli so he might still have the 3d files still. Won't harm to ask.

Ehh I don't think you really need to make any allowances. Most DCS players prefer to go FF Master Race anyway if it's a decent option, and the ones that don't are going to have to face a bit of hopefully just friendly ribbing from both their teammates and oppenents likely. Then when LAZUR datalink becomes availible, you'll get some interesting options the are unique to the FF MiG-29. I feel the FC3 should still be around though so new players can get their feet wet, but I think when people see the difference between the somewhat crude (though good for the time it was made) FC3 and the FF people will go for the more authentic feeling one.

We still have to wait longer for GCI. In RL MIG-29 has been instructed by ground EWRs. Rarely by AWACS.

433 SQN