All Activity

Dont you dare talk trash about the topone!

Sounds like a similar experience to me with the 57PPD. If you contact Pimax support and ask for the 50PPD module to be sent you can swap them out and you may find that the 50PPD module is much better. That is what I did and now I'm keeping the super with the 50PPD.

"Since patch 2, the front wheel of the SEM and the Etendart is locked to the right!" No problems here 'towards 2.9.21', maybe a bug from the mission being re-registered???

Interesting, how far up does it go? The altimeter doesn’t seem to adjust up much.

This is not correct. Check video. After STD HDG alignment, aircraft position is still at initial startup (WP0). Check the coordinates at alignment, they are always set at initial position. I even tried to set WP0 to new position but it wont work. INS_ISSUE(1).mp4 A/C is at Sukhumi rwy in the video, not Batumi (initial position) It is a procedure where the aircraft INS saves the precise true heading of the plane in memory (DTC). Special setup is needed before shutdown, currently non-functional in game. F15E module has the QRF start option inside mission editor which is realistic. I assume that the initial position is from the DTC (beginning of each mission IRL) and the UFC is a backup to give initial position. My initial issue was that in the Syria map, there are lots of airbases where TACAN is not available. Also, I know that TACAN aligns the INS perfectly in DCS but its not a very elegant workaround... + this workaround does not work on an airbase without TACAN. I am just asking for an ability to set the A/C own position on the HSI A/C submenu (video above) so that this module can align INS on every airbase, not just at mission start.

Hier eine Doku über den Luftkampf zwischen Nato und Russland aktuell bzw. geplant. Etwas populärwissenschaftlich aber ich finde trotzdem interessant.

Great pictures! What's up with the one that has the Canadian markings?

Hi, doch, das habe ich mitbekommen. Ich selbst habe 2 Kampagnen für die UH-1. Aber ich muss sagen, das mich das Modul UH-1 einfach nicht thrillt, in keinster Weiße. Das Geld für das Modul (als auch die Kampagnen Argo & World's Apart) hätte ich mir, im Nachhinein, sparen können. Es liegt am Modul. Ich persönlich finde die beiden Mi's sind einfach auf einem unerreichbaren Level. Ich äußere jetzt einfach mal einen Wunsch, da ich der Überzeugung bin das Du ihn erfüllen könntest (Lassen wir mal den Frust & Ärger über STORMFRONT beiseite): Eine Kampagne im Sinne von World's Apart (Habe hier die 1 Mission durch. Von der Immersion her wirklich top!) für die Mi-24. Deine Mi-8 Kampagne steht bei mir nach wie vor auf dem Wunschzettel. Wie du dich da reinhängst finde ich bemerkenswert. Was mich brennend interessiert ist, in welche Richtung sich die Mi-8 Kampagne bewegt. Eher Transport, eher Kampf, ausgeglichen. Was für eine Story du dir dazu ausgedacht hast...Anmerkung meinerseits: Wie man so etwas 'vergessen' kann ist mir schleierhaft. Mir fallen dazu andere Bezeichnungen ein, aber ich möchte hier jetzt keine wilde Diskussion vom Zaun brechen. Alles gut. Lass Dich nicht unterkriegen.

Yes is there a discord?

Non devi uscire ogni volta: una volta configurato moza cockpit per dcs (lo si fa in pochi click) puoi impostare il caricamento automatico dei profili, per cui quando cambi velivolo ci pensa moza cockpit a caricare il relativo profilo in automatico.

Was used by military, more in 50-60, but aside from it's sport role nowadays it was an auxiliary airport. ICAO: LYBJ, https://www.airhistory.net/location/8168/Belgrade-Lisicji-Jarak Another is Kovin airport, which belonged to the army: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kovin_Airport

I agree, we need Altis and Stratis in DCS.

Went looking for this skin pack yesterday for a friend and couldn't locate it. Has it been removed? -Cal

Mucha suerte

FAQ now states EA at the end of 2026...which one is right?

I know you said non-fiction, but I just finished Raven One and bought the second part of the series.

Volevo capire una cosa, ma devo per forza caricare un profilo per usarlo con un determinato modulo? Non posso lasciare a DCS come operare con il FFB in base al modello di mezzo che sto volando? Poi in caso sia necessario avere profili personalizzati questi possono caricarsi automaticamente in base al modulo utilizzato (come fa ad esempio il VAICOM) oppure devo essere io che ogni volta vado a mano a cambiare manualmente profilo? Ed Infine posso caricare profili al volo con DCS aperto o succedono casini? Grazie a tutti gli amici che so avere il Moza AB9 e che mi potranno chiarire le idee. In attesa dell’arrivo che, non mi ero reso conto, ma sarà a metà dicembre.

As i understand Afhganistan and Iraq maps only got better detail. No areas were actually added...the map size didn't change..

I've found a rather interesting method that I think works well even if the target isn't saved in the DTC. Of course, we need to know the target's location (altitude), which is easy to determine by hovering the mouse cursor over the map (F10) where the target should be (even if it's hidden). Example: STEP 1: target height 299m. STEP 2: we divide the height by 8 = 37 (we round it) STEP 3: we subtract it from the standard QNH = 1013-37 = QFE is 976 (we set it on the altimeter) So: target elevation in meters / 8 = X and 1013 - X = QFE for target location for MiG. I once recorded something like this for Viggen, but here we have to be at the airport:

Sombor added, Lisičji Jarak is more like a sportski aerodrom, so I don't think it fits into here. Also added on the map.

For me it is still working, after several updates in DCS and HFS. Check if it is working in the HFS vibrating tests. Maybe another stuff modified the export.lua file. If you share it, I can take a look.

Is there a possibility that the map could be expanded in the future with additional detail and further phases, similar to what has happened with other maps (e.g. Iraq / Afghanistan)? As someone from Greece, I would personally love to eventually see the entire country represented in DCS. Most of the Greek territory is sea and islands, so a southern expansion might not be as demanding in terms of dense land terrain. Additionally, such an expansion could also potentially allow a future connection with the Sinai map, which would provide tremendous operational value and regional continuity across the Eastern Mediterranean.

To bridge the waiting time!

++++ the idea is very interesting Will it be possible to use the P-800 Oniks against ground targets in the future? And what do you think about reworking the Tu 22M3? so that its Kh-22 missiles can also be used against ground targets

This.