All Activity

https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/ru/files/685737/

41:48 New Parachute Physics?

NOTE 1: When is it coming? We are still shooting for this month, but we cannot give an exact date until testing is complete. NOTE 2: In a later video, I'll discuss the ADF Panel. NOTE 3: I am not at liberty to discuss 3rd party products. Please keep comments on topic. NOTE 4: I'm still just learning this aircraft, so my skills (particularly in in-close IFR), need work. I know. In the previous two videos, we introduced you to our MiG-29A and how to start it up, taxi, and takeoff. In this video, we’ll learn navigation in the Fulcrum and how to land it. MiG-29A navigation is quite a bit different than navigating other 4th generation aircraft like the Viper and F/A-18C, but once you get your head around it, it’s rather easy system to use. For this video, we are parked in a hot Fulcrum at Herat airfield in western Afghanistan. I’m going to explain two methods of creating your navigation points: Using basic Mission Editor functions and using the Data Transfer Card, or DTC. When using basic Mission Editor functions, you can place up to six points; the first three are assigned to the three Navigation panel aerodrome buttons and the second three are assigned to the three waypoint buttons. You cannot assign the radio beacon buttons using this method; you’ll need to use the DTC for that. When using the DTC option, you can also assign the three radio beacon navigation buttons on the Navigation panel and a lot more control of aerodrome points and waypoints. Note that the real MiG-29A does not have an actual DTC card but is rather programmed into the aircraft prior to flight. For both methods, we’ll create a navigation plan from Herat to Shindand to the south. As the Fulcrum uses an Inertial Navigation System, INS, that can drift, we’ll also discuss how to tighten the alignment using a visual fix. In addition to creating navigation points, we’ll also touch on Return to Base, Landing, and Missed Approach modes.

And individually folded mirrors, it’s novelty I believe?

1. Можно ли стрелять одновременно из Подвесных Пушечных Установок и Встроенной Пушечной Установоке? Я пробовал переключать и так и этак, но что-то не получалось. 2. Не могу понять как читать показания Топливомера. Если к примеру горит лампочка бака 1 или 1 и 2 это что значит? Заправлял замолёт полностью, подвешивал два бака - горит только римская 1. Как понять из какого бака берётся топливо? П.С. К сожалению хорошей, подробной инструкции по эксплуатации к СУ-25Т я так и не нашёл.

I think the solution, unpopular as it may be, is a subscription model. Don't want to pay the subscription? Then you get the game as it stands at the time the subscription model is implemented with no further development work. I'll add that as critical as I may sound, I love DCS and have played since its inception (and earlier with the original SU-27 Flanker games). I have nearly every ED and 3rd party module, and every map (except for South Atlantic). I'm one of DCS's most loyal customers, but I firmly believe the current business model will result in an unmanageable "ecosystem" of software with constantly growing maintenance needs with no ongoing revenue stream to sustain it.

This. Totally this. We all love DCS. We want it to succeed. Hell, I've based a good chunk of my future retirement plans on it! When veteran and amazing module developers like cfrag -- whom I have the ultimate respect for here in the community -- is getting frustrated and jumping ship, it brings great concern to the future of this software. Without cfrag and other VOLUNTEERS like him, DCS would have been a dead, empty void a decade ago. The fact that ED treated them like unpaid interns and never valued their feedback NOR integrated any of their mods (paying them, of course) is disappointing. I also, have invested a good chunk of money in modules and maps. Don't care if the core is free, that should be the MOST WORKING part of the whole sim, otherwise the modules are useless. PS: Notice most of the ones in this thread and others with torches and pitchforks for DCS/ED critical topics are ones with 1-2K++ posts?

Understandable

Более не актуально

I can't remember if there's a name for that. Ponoo .. pizzagate .. fonzi ... It began with a "P"...

The last Mig-29 video, show configurable RSBN/PRMG with Channels and names on mission editor. Other point has the sun visor on helmet.

New video!

Sounds like a no brainer for the Hook and other haulers but also as an aircraft walkaround before the flight.

Are you sure? I think what you hear in the plane is programmed by HB so that when the F4 RWR “sees” xy, this audio track is played.

Thanks Rudel_chw, Glad I found this thread, I thought that when the ME lost it's aircaft box I was stuffed. Done all sorts, repair etc, delet map and re-install, then found this page. No idea when a dud Mod started to do this, Was used to dud Mod just stopped you getting the game going. Thanks anyway, even if it's an old fault.

Ok, just finished my third attempt and scored 100

I've said before and I will say again... it is a broken and unsustainable business model. That is at the core of all the DCS "issues". ED gets an upfront payment for an early-access module packaged with the promise of future development efforts bringing the module to completion. Before that module is ever complete, another early access module is launched, and they get another upfront payment, which is necessary and they surely need to be able to continue to pay their staff. With each module launch, the amount of work required to bring the early access modules to completion, maintain the existing modules, and work on the core grows exponentially, all while needing to launch *another* early access module just to have an ongoing revenue stream to sustain the future efforts. It is crazy, and it doesn't work. The amount of maintenance required on existing modules and early access modules for which ED no longer collects revenue will eventually become unsustainable.

I'm looking forward to trying this out now. It looks like the halo mount will allow you to remove the face gasket like with the QP. @RealDCSpilot have you tried this?

When you end the mission, you can save a track file.

Das Thema heißt MFD, was hast du erwartet? das wir Gedanken lesen können? Hier ein Grundsatz fürs Leben- Denken, drücken, sprechen. SO nun genug geschimpft, deine Anfrage ist sehr allgemein. Buttonboxen gibt es wie Sand am Meer, was teuer ist und was nicht, liegt im Auge des Betrachters bzw. deinen Fähigkeiten und Möglichkeiten selbst etwas zu bauen. Ich habe mir eine "allgemeine" Buttonbox selbst gebaut. 3 Wege schalter, 2 Wege Schalter, Drehregler. Was ich für meine Module halt so brauche. Das geht mit Leo Bodnar Boards sehr sehr einfach. Die sind Plug and play. Alles was du brauchst ist das Board, die Kabel und die Schalter. Ein bisschen Löten ist auch nötig, aber nichts wildes. Wenn du schon Winwing im EInsatz hast kennst du ja deren Qualität. Evtl. wäre dann eine Box von denen eine gute Investittion. Ich nutzte aber von denen nichts und weiß schlicht nicht was die alles anbieten. VKB ist noch ein Hersteller in der Mittel bis Einsteiger Klasse, diese nutze ich für andere Games und bin sehr zufrieden, Preise sind aus meiner Sicht völlig I.O. Letzlich wirst du hier viele verschieden Sichtweisen bekommen, in dem Hobby gibt es sehr viele Wege um sein Pit den Bedrüfnissen anzupassen.

Can you attach an example mission where you are having trouble? I can take a look. Thanks!

Added to FAQ: Do I want this if I already own the Flaming Cliffs version? If you are a fan of simulation of complex real world systems, then yes, you very much want this. The Flaming Cliffs version for everything but FM is very simplified for ease of use, based on what Flaming Cliffs was meant to be. The MiG-29A Fulcrum will be like learning a new aircraft, from navigation to employing weapons and all the challenges expected for this complex Russian fighter.

Maybe I wasn't remembering correctly and was getting confused with my Quest 2. Thanks for the info.