All Activity

What @Yurgon writes. You don't have to worry at all. Unfortunately, you must pay a little attention when it finally arrives. It's a Steam issue, and nothing new. The question and complains always drops when there's a pre-order. [emoji4] You know you can switch, right? [emoji6] Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

It can happen with ANY other third party, is the nature of the model.

I can't help thinking that people are making some questionable assumptions about the merits of having access to module source code if a developer stops support. Even if you have the complete, up-to-date code, maintaining it may be a real struggle. Trying to make sense of someone else's code for something as complex as a DCS module, when you not only have to have a deep understanding of the DCS API, but of the particular systems on the aircraft being modelled, could prove very tricky, or on occasion even impossible - with the best will in the world, a developer is unlikely to have put the effort into documenting everything to the extent that an outsider can simply pick up the code and 'fix' it when issues arise. The developers don't have any real incentive to do so, and documenting things takes time away from the more profitable business of getting the product out the door. Clearly, having access to the source is better than not having it, but it isn't going to result in ED (or another developer) being able to simply take over development as if nothing has happened.

Beispiel Brücke auf Kola: Range T20 / bei 4 x sollte es doch so sein wie T5 oder? Denke ich Falsch? Also im Sniper (ATP) hätte ich gerne mehr Details vom Model/Ansicht erwartet .

Right, I missed that part. Seems like some real issue then Have you tried different cables? K-51 hasn't been to the forum since March. I hope he's alright. Maybe he would know how to fix it. Sent from my SM-A536B using Tapatalk

Schau dir die Range an: T 11 +-! Da kannst du bald von Hand abwerfern "Long Range" Ist wohl ein"Problem" der LODs -> zuerst Low Poly Models ... Aber im Sniper hätte "wir" gerne high Poly Models... ist ne programmier Aufgabe. Es nervt, wenn die Brückenpfeiler auftauchen und wieder verschwinden, dann wieder auftauchen, oder andere Objete, dann kannst abdrehen und wieder anfliegen .. Macht doch mal ein Test: (ohne Sams, wie im Vid), Autopilot und check was sich im TV Mode ändert, oder wann es "gut aus sieht"

I also uninstalled DCS, but it kept doing it. I'll try the repair as well. If it's long, that means it's more thorough and precise, right? Otherwise, if it's short, it's less effective? I have the F14 module, plus two campaigns, DCS Supercarrier, and the Nevada map. I'll try again, thanks for the directions.

Just subliminally getting the idea of a C2 module into their heads, the boat really could benefit from a good COD module. Jokes aside, you are right about that, and considering the context of disobeying orders and almost doing a water landing, I don't think stinger wants them in a C2. LOL.

No, I haven't changed the profile settings. I did change easy communitcation is mission editor, customize : Enforce and value are now both turn on.

okay guys, so i did have shapes coming and going with MIST, so I know it's possible on the code layer. Hit me up for how, but more to the point: I'm scrapping that method as we are DELIBERATELY MOVING AWAY from mist as it conflicts now with MOOSE I'm told (rolls eyes forever) - but anyone who's saying it's not feasible from the scripting layer is nutty: WE HAD IT WORKING IN MIST. Now.... MOOSE: Show mewhatchugot! it was something like: -- So Why Now We Can No Usie MOOSE?! or generally .....LUA? mist.marker.remove('Shape-7') mist.marker.drawShape('Shape-7')

guys, you're all awesome for being here but can i ask, anyone who sees this (honestly less about this thread than others I've been on today), if we can refrain from providing solutions that break the premise of the affair: * If someone's trying to get a mod to work, and sees log errors, work on the mod, don't tell them to remove it. * If someone's told you their computer is specc'ed out and shows scripting errors, don't tell them to upgrade their machine. * And if someone's got the life hell going on that they're here, try to help out in the first message, there's a lot of waffle. But guys.... I am tremendously grateful this place is here. I am having a mod-riddled day, but I love them dearly and am here to find out WTF is this: There are thousands showing up when I look around (in a modded game) for VARIOUS types of equipment, in and out of mods. ....I'da at least thought someone here would know some config to set, identify which mod ( we shamelessly poured on 9 or so ) or perhaps give me a technical reason behind why this is happening - to clearly many of us. I hereby join the party... Thanks in advance. 2025-08-07 13:21:12.906 WARNING BACKENDCOMMON (5424 Need to reprocess [DDS] image '/textures/door_Diffuse_RoughMet.dds'. Reason: Conversion requires - expanded pixel size, setting

Stinger just said a cargo plane, he didn't say what kind...The Navy does have -130 variants.

Here's a question for you ED. Are all current modules going forward protected? As in, do you have the source code so we don't end up in this situation (again)? If not, what source code are you missing?

Dropping MOABs isn't a civil act. The flares aren't for celebrating either. Last not least combat landings are for combat scenarios. The Herk fits here.

The most useful fuse so far, for low level drops is the Mk 244 mod A1. How low can you go? 50'? 30' is the lowest, to enable the fuse to arm. 4 sconds delay. The correct fuse for this type of work, is the AN M116 5 sec tail fuse, but it doesn't work. This one will do.. ..

Hello 10 years later. RB F15E 3d model and cockpit in the final product was absolutely gorgeous and beautiful inside and out. Thank you M2M for the hard work, it is a shame we might see this beauty gone forever.

A couple of fictional Eye Candy Liveries for the Static Grumman Tracker and Tracer by NYChancellor: THESE ARE STATIC ONLY AIRCRAFT - available on the download site. https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/index.php?PAGEN_1=3 E1B https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3338272/ S2 I say Fictional but they are quite close to reasonably accurate for a couple of them !!! The only Navy to fly the E1B Tracer was the USN, but I fancied a RAN one for myself so you can have a copy of that. https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/ke0iu7qnwjo5sxkh3t1wc/CrazyEddies-Grumman-Liveries.zip?rlkey=rkp8r8oy803954lyd2vcz5252&st=f5fk0t3o&dl=0

Процессор i5 6400 Cитуация - запускаю DCS World MT, спаунюсь Нвидиа оверлей показывает FPS 32, при повороте камеры заметные статтеры Альттаблюсь, таск менеджер, детали, тыкаю dcs.exe, set affinity - ничего не меняю. Все ядра выбраны. Просто тыкаю ОК Альтаблюсь назад - 90 фпс и всё макс плавно. Норма?)

I had a play with it, IL2 went really cock-eyed. Lol.

+1 Also, do we get damage model for the tires as we get for the A-10? Sometimes after a rough landing, I get confused when my jet moves funny but I see no gear damage. I would like to see the Viper become a study-level jet.

I just ment: I wanted to try if EFM 2.1.0 can be turned (locally in my computer) to efm 2.1.0 + Hotfixes. And it did actually work, only the player did not go right. I think it is just about some criss cross in the files itself, but yes. I will just wait for next release (yes i know 2.1.0 works fine (outcluding TWS multilaunch, but that is on every more or less samekind of efm mod atm) no problem:) There were also new sidewinders

Со скоростью 200 знаков в минуту если только.

Would have to be an ASC C-2 Greyhound module for that bit

It's a shame to waste your life on toxic, demanding people. This kind of behavior leaves many great projects in the hands of their creators. @tobiThank you for all the work you've done so far for us helicopter enthusiasts. I wish you joy and peace in your life.