All Activity

Any news on this? Really would like to see this in DCS.

This is unrelated and already reported:

Yes, "Resolution of cockpit displays" works also for mirrors. There are 256, 512 and 1024 options to select and some have also "every frame" version, which means the displays are either refreshed with full fps or half (or 15fps, not sure). Mind that you have to restart DCS for this change to apply.

Hey, Recently I decided I should upgrade Pimax Play to see if I can check out the upscaling features & the integrated Pimax XR & Quad Views, and while the installation seemed to work fine I found that the performance & settings of the integrated Quad Views was lacking, so much so that I disabled it and went back to the stand alone version. Looking at the integrated QV settings and the QV companion settings they are not comparable and some of the settings (such as the sharpness & thickness settings at the bottom) are missing entirely. Can anyone recommend how to migrate the settings from the stand alone QVs to the Pimax Integrated version so I can test as close to 'like for like' as possible. Thanks!

Yup. Sources say by 8 inches - not sure if that's per tip, or overall. Either way, it was because some RN carriers had hangers which were just too low to take an unclipped Corsair with wings folded. There are a lot of myths floating around with regard to RN Corsairs, and the idea that this minor modification was made for any more significant reason is one of them. The RN also operated land-based Corsairs, unclipped, so they clearly didn't think it mattered otherwise.

Like right now. I think it's great! I spend half my DCS time just flying around because it's a great flightsim. I'm here for the planes and the fun. Sure, I enjoy the high-tech MFD watch-things-go-Kaboom! aspect of it, but first and foremost it's all about the planes and the flying, and for me DCS is the tightest rightest flightsim ever. I just love the flying.

Thanks for sharing that. I believe we all understand that this could be affected by unexpected delays but it is highly welcomed to have a reference target timeframe. Thanks!

Oh ffs, the doomsayers are on the run again. Please, if you don't like DCS or can't wait for it to fail - Just. Walk. Away. But please stop trying to convince everybody else that it is flawed or doomed. When you have specific things to criticise, by all means, go ahead, idealy provide evidence and suggest solutions - but this passive aggressive dramatization, please no!

For me the solution was to change the performance settings in windows. Switching the PC from "balanced" to "best performance" fixed the stuttering issue for me.

Quite the understatement

There is definitely something wrong. But it might be on DCS side (I don't have any mod and I repaired DCS). I flew M2 again and still scored 50 (see tacview file). I skipped it and flew M3. I was scoring 0 after takeoff so I shut down DCS then opened it again, then scored 50 right at the begining. I don't have scoring issue with other campaigns though. Anyway this campaign is awsome, as each campaign you designed. Thanks ! Tacview-20250911-110330-DCS.zip.acmi

I believe they were clipped to fit into the slightly smaller British carriers. Cheers! Sent from my SM-G998B using Tapatalk

I can confirm that. It sounds strange. I just couldn't figure out exactly why that is.

Were wings not clipped to improve low-altitude performance? That’s why the Spitfire’s wings were clipped in some variants, I believe…

I'd be surprised if the small change to the wingtip profile made any meaningful difference to performance in real life. Maybe with very careful testing they might have been able to detect a difference, but why would they bother? It needed to be done (to fit some RN carriers), so they did it. Pilots who expected a difference might have thought there was one, but given all the other variables, there's no particular reason to assume this was more than imagination. And even if there was a difference, we don't have data on it...

I just did:

Hello ED and @Flappie, Please have a look at the thread linked below, it includes tracks. Thanks!

sure thing!

1hrs mai 1 joint 2hrs mai luch 3hrs mai 2 joint1hrs mai 1 joint 2hrs mai luch 3hrs mai 2 joint1hrs mai 1 joint 2hrs mai luch 3hrs mai 2 joint1hrs mai 1 joint 2hrs mai luch 3hrs mai 2 joint1hrs mai 1 joint 2hrs mai luch 3hrs mai 2 joint1hrs mai 1 joint 2hrs mai luch 3hrs mai 2 joint1hrs mai 1 joint 2hrs mai luch 3hrs mai 2 joint1hrs mai 1 joint 2hrs mai luch 3hrs mai 2 joint

Hi, we appreciate the effort but we didn't model the Magic I, it's an ED matter.

@BIGNEWY @NineLine Can you help? And same case here:

Hi Karl, As far as I know the SDK you need to do this in DCS is not available for modders.

Ну вот за это прям отдельное спасибо. Я-то сначала предполагал, что и Вихрю можно дать внешнее ЦУ а тут всё не так просто ввиду фактически отсутствия ГСН как таковой. Ракета в принципе строго говоря не знает куда летит. Ей нужно сразу после пуска попасть в "лазерный конус" в рамках которого луч создаёт растр, создающий сетку по определённому циклу, благодаря чему ракета понимает, в каком месте растра она сейчас находится и корректирует свой полёт, поскольку "имеющийся в схеме управления ракетой фильтр частот отсекает токи большей частоты, которые пропустил фотодиод (это значит, что ракета близко к центральной оси конуса и коррекция полёта не требуется). При этом фильтр частот пропускает токи меньшей частоты, благодаря которым на двигатель рулевого привода подаётся управляющий сигнал, отклоняющий рули ракеты в нужную сторону". В общем, у Вихря совсем свой принцип наведения. Правда остаётся открытым вопрос, можно ли так всё ещё навести Х-25, с внешнего подсвета. С того же Апача, например. Поскольку там ПАЛ ГСН

That's on the kneeboard/mission creator. I support the wish Check also this suggestion: