All Activity

Hello everyone, at Poduzhemye airfield, the trees at the beginning and end of the runway are too close to the runway to be able to place the new PRMG units. The localiser car must be positioned 600 metres from the end of the runway, and this is not possible on either side here. The trees are also a problem when following the glide path during instrument flight. I interpret the satellite images to mean that the trees at the beginning and end of the runway only grew after the base was decommissioned, because they are much thinner than the rest of the trees.

When it first came out, this was bindable but the ability was removed after its first update.

Вы невнимательны. Я подобного и не утверждал.

Hi, Is there a way to disable the feature that skips duplicate messages in the log file? I'm thinking that it's waiting for a new text to be logged before even logging the "XX duplicate message(s) skipped." message, making it difficult for us to check if some process is regularily logging the same message... @NineLine a thought? Thanks!

Spectacular map! Couldn't wait for other seasons to come, so I started playing with the textures a bit.

They are definitely installed in the 'Saved Games' folder, but I have my saved games folder set as the root directory of a dedicated secondary SSD. It's working now for all the aircraft & liveries I have installed. Thanks for your help! It's was just odd that it found the UH-60 in the same location, but not the OH6 with 0.27.8

One “issue” I have with the corsair is that in my mind the reactions to minute control inputs are way too high. Especially in pitch. Displacing the stick for millimetres already results in high G’s. Since there is actually two seperate logical things happening here (control input and FFB output), opposed to one direct physical cause and effect relationship in the real craft - maybe there is a teeny tiny disconnect between pitch trim and stick displacement, but you would need to be particularly picky to notice that imho. If it even exists. Another thing to keep in mind is, that increasing load on the control surfaces will have a bending/stretching/torsion effect on the connection to the stick. (In the real craft I mean). So if you would (theoretically) lock the stick in place and trim, there would be increasing load on the linkages and wires which would give in ever so slightly. Enough for the elevator to move a bit. I don’t know if the physics simulation in the module goes so far though…..

Bella idea! Sempre importante condividere e cercare di alzare il livello di conoscenza e consapevolezza!

И у меня нет. И у ED нет значений этих вероятностей. Потому они скорей всего оставят отключение радаром СПО потому что нет данных как это надёжно работает. Точнее есть одни данные -работает плохо. Все, приплыли, сушим весла.

No, it doesn’t. Well it is kind of hard to hold perfectly still, since the force obviously increases, but it only pitches over significantly when I let go of the stick. To put it differently, I could control the aircraft in pitch and roll (and yaw actually, with ffb pedals) by virtue of using trim only. You can actually monitor the trim position on the controls overlay.

hi, the lack of a decent Vietnam map has often been lamented. We have many desert maps, but only a few tiny islands, also known as the Marianas, that resemble Asian environments. Which maps do you use as substitutes? Surprisingly, the Afghanistan map isn't too bad, but... what do you think? cheers, sinzov ps: the Thunderchief refuses to jettison it's payload while doing dogfights ;-( null

'Stray Syrian anti-aircraft missile' hits northern Cyprus

Всем здрасте, такой значится вопрос: не знает ли кто то когда на апач повесить можно будет стингеры?

интерпретация вся работа всех СПО в ДКС ! Попробуй меня убедить что RWR ALR56 для Ф16Ц реализован на все сто как в реальности нет ,потому как у меня нет изложенной на бумаге такой информации ,и по этому мои высказывания будут называться домыслами !

А можно написать прямо, в каких случаях?

Thanks for the reply! Very strange. My rhino behaves appropriately with all the other modules, except possibly the Chinook. 1) Yup, axis setup is correct. 2) Never touched DCS pitch axis. 3) Did invert pitch in FF Tuning, which did correct stick movement. That is to say, trimming for nose down makes the stick return to a pushed forward position. 4) I've already tried with TelemFFB on and off. I may try a DCS repair, just because this really feels like both trim modes are active at once. Extra odd, I'm pretty sure it behaves as expected for roll. (edited: roll has same problem) Also tried toggling FFB off and on for DCS. Retested with controls indicator open. The control diamond should have to be held in the same place for stable flight, no matter your trim settings (aside from the near negligible pitch force generated by trim tabs themselves). Instead the position to hold steady flight varies with the location of the trim diamond. I think this should be pretty independent of anything the VPForce software is doing since I'm basically ignoring stick forces and just locking the stick in place. Or rather if TelemFFB or VPConfigurator were doing anything, I would see that reflected in movement of the control diamond position. Just to confirm, if you hold your stick firmly in place and trim up and down, your corsair doesn't pitch?

Il progetto sembra interessante, sono ufficialmente il tuo 4to iscritto.

Just some clever 3D printed clamps for the 8020 rails. https://blog.hempstick.org/2025/10/clever-little-3d-printed-clamps-for.html

Another one after those fixes above. Loading the F-4 A2A training mission dcs.log-20251012-163737.zip DxDiag.txt

Железный аргумент. Хотел было написать, что ,например, если б в описании радара было написано ВОЗМОЖНО отображение ложных целей, то доверяли бы мы остальным показаниям радара или считали бы его не рабочим.. Но БП МиГ-29 и мнение Fighter 29 кроет все это... Потому и считал / считаю, что вопрос ложных показаний СПО дискуссионный. Получается в МиГ-29 СПО бесполезно. В Су-27 РЛЭ допускает какие-то шансы на то, что СПО работает нормально.

Hah, awesome job man, really fun video. Those rally helicopter pilots are nutjobs.

Тут да, нужна вероятность которой нет. Но есть документ Fighter29 который говорит что вероятность=высокая => невозможность использования. И есть опыт использования СПО его же. Больше деталей было бы интересно, само собой. Логично, но логика - плохой проводник в науке. Там может возникать перегруз датчика и/или или вычислителя и даже *другие* частоты могут как следствие не обсчитываться. Но это тоже интерпретация само собой.

читаем РЛЭ Т10КЭ внимательно и видим какая загорается индикация , далее читаем учебник по СПО находим каким частотам соответствует "тип Х" и сводим дебет с кредитом в каких случаях возникает ложное срабатывание Л006/Л006ЛМ ! если ложная сигнализация имело место быть всегда то так и было бы написано СПО не использовать как в приведенных дока от Fighter29

Это интерпретация ФАБ999. А еще там сказано что цветомузыка (ложная индикация) лишь ВОЗМОЖНА, а не обязательна. Расплывчатое описание в РЛЭ....

Интерпретация там одна - то что написано. Дописывать еще одни шаг, где СПО+БРЛС начинают работать в тандеме - это домысел. Там этого не написано.