All Activity

Wow! There's a saying that goes, "Nobody thinks about you as much as you think about yourself". If you take the time to make mods for ANY game then people who use them mostly do it because they think it's a good mod/idea. If the maker expects gratitude and plaudits from every one of these people then I would (respectfully) suggest that the maker is probably in the wrong game. Personally I love making skins, especially for WW2 planes and there have been many downloads of them by people (like, in the hundreds). I actually do them for my own enjoyment and, like @Rudel_chw above, don't really care one way or the other if people use them or not. I merely post them just in case someone can find a use for them. I would just take it easy and maybe re-assess why you actually do these things... Peace Rap

Well, not absolutely necessary but I thought it might be a handy way to integrate the manual into DCS.

Probably not, as DCS thinks this is a helicopter, so it will always behave like a helicopter. But others are welcome to test it out and try different AI settings. I did not add the kneeboard thinking it would not be necessary. But I can add it in easily if desired.

Yes Andre, in my case the standard HF8. Thanks for asking. Happy landings, Talisman

Cos the devs don't fancy dev'ing them any more - pretty simple! Who knows what may happen in the future, but I do know that the questions don't change, or speed up, the answers sooo.... Enjoying and spreading the joy of the OH-6A might tho - love the videos @CommandT!

Mission 11: I don't know why I have a map from mission 10 in my kneepboard and the reconnaissance photos are missing. The same thing happens in mission 12. I checked the campaign files. I'm comparing it to the PDF document that came with the campaign.

Just in case anyone is interested - There is a "Problem" and i have had complaints from users who downloaded the Marianas WW2 Train Pack. The "Problem" is the Trains are not able to be Deactivated. This is a "DCS problem" - E.G - When a train arrives at a destination users cannot Deactivate and make the train Dissapear ( it works in old ST version but not in MT Version ) The trains just continue out over the ocean or over the grass for ever ! I have reported this issue several times but it still needs fixing. I even showed "Wags" DCS trains flying over a SuperCarrier. Also My "DML" Train Time Table Schedule Sequencer and Signalling System does not work anymore because the trains will not Deactivate and Clone. There is Marianas WW2 / Normandy British Train Pack and the Cold war Germany Train Packs i was working on. However because of this situation regretably the Marianas WW2 Train Pack is pulled from the DCS Files site untill the Deactivation Issue is fixed in an update. Wait and see i guess ?

Potentially GOAT mod!!

Some civilian cars travel incredibly fast these days, often rivaling sports models. Car Windows Tinting can enhance both style and privacy while driving.

threads merged please go to saved games dcs find the launcher.sqlite3 delete and restart dcs it should help

Yes, this can happen, and has happened to me once in the past. It was during a long LOWOS campaign mission. I was not on the DED page, and some other weird things were happening along side, particularly the TGP also became unusable, as it would, uncommanded, change it's orientation from looking at a steerpoint or markpint, and instead look some random direction over the horizon to the north. I could cursor zero back to the steer/mark point, but it would only stay looking at that spot for a few seconds, and then re-orient itself to the [seemingly] random direction. I hypothesized that the HAD is interfering with the TGP, as it is intended to do when you lock an emitter, but instead the HAD was commanding the TGP to look at [something else]. I suspect there is something happening if an emitter "despawns" while locked with the HAD that might cause some sort of error. Which means it's a scprit that is part of the mission causing the problem, and is therefore, supposedly, outside of the responsibility of eagle dynamics to fix or address (understandable). This may not be the exact cause but I suspect there is something going on that is similar to my hypothesis. If I had had the where-with-all I would have tried turning my HTS off and seeing if the TGP went back to normal, but I was to frustrated at the time. So my question to you guys in here experiencing the problem, did you notice if your TGP was behaving normally or abnormally when you were having HAD issues?

Yes agreed that there’s no guarantee, which is the smart move - I’ll rephrase what I was saying about support: ED’s commitment to support ceasing beyond 2.9.X is simply a statement of ED’s position now; it does not rule out support being extended beyond that.

Edit :

ED can absolutely provide what this "breach of contract" was. They are choosing not to. I for one, don't just blindly accept their statement. ED should absolutely OWN their part in this disagreement and not hide behind silence. That would be the right thing to earn back trust. They can stay silent sure. But when those modules get left behind with no explanation, not sure how they expect that to go. Should note that ED was careful in their wording of their latest announcement: "...Eagle Dynamics will do its best to ensure that these modules continue to function in 2.9.X". That statement doesn't even guarantee they will work in 2.9.X, just that they will "do their best". And sure 3.0 may be far away, 2.10 might be around the corner.

In a recent message on RB discord, for what its worth- Ron said if RB gets payment, they will happily return full force to finish out and complete the promises for the module, as well as support it. Despite everything, he is willing to make it happen and uphold the modules. For all our sakes, I hope something positive can happen. The F15E is a fantastic gem of a module, I pray it gets resolved.

I knew this question is kinda boring but i just wonder. As someone have little interest in russian. i wonder why ai call his sign 107 as сто семь ноль(170/one hundred and seven and zero ) instead of один ноль семь(one zero seven)(works fine on atc calling player).kinda like bug. Any native russian or it is just a bug ? how ai call: 2025-08-06 22-27-37.remuxed.mp4

What's happening here, i haven't altered a thing now all the modules are in Chinese, DCS has been full updated and repaired and i have not changed anything.

Reasons nobody can verify. Because Razbam deny this version and no court resolution has beeing taken. We have "versions" of the dispute. Nothing else

As other mentioned and by the rumors of a new heli coming up. I'd be surprised if it is not a UH-60 helicopter by how popular that is on other sims. That would fit right into SAR/CSAR missions.

Exactly. ED have already stated their reasons in black and white. As for the modules being deprecated, that statement was simply stating the limitations of ED’s current commitment (ie worst-case scenario). DCS 3.0 is still some time away, in the meantime there is nothing preventing ED from extending their current commitment.

Долго летал на f 16 и f 18, но тут потянуло на родину. Столкнулся с проблемой на су 33 и су 27. Нос самолёта постоянно тянет вверх. Я перечитал форум, смотрел видео, но именно у меня самолёт не тримируется, какие бы кнопки я не нажимал и не зажимал. Тут скорее не вопрос почему его тянет вниз, а как его правильно оттремировать. Вроде ползунок двигается вниз, а вроде ничего и не происходит. Помогите)

Sure, I don't think there's any question that Razbam wouldn't work for free...but I think the thing people don't factor in is the assumption that this all only started when Razbam didn't get paid. If Razbam was supposed to be providing the source code, and ED said "Hey, we really need you guys to move your source code to the repo" and Razbam said something like "Oh, for sure! We're just working on the F-15E really hard right now, once we get it pushed out we'll move all of that source code over" and ED says "Okay, sure". Then we fast forward a few months, the F-15E is out, ED's still nagging them to get the source code moved, and they say they're going to, but don't...for whatever reason. If that's the way things played out, then I can understand why a company would then go to taking legal measures and withholding payments...because you really don't have any other option if someone's making money off of your platform but not upholding their end of the agreement. Now, all of that said, that all makes a lot of assumptions about the requirements on Razbam, and that's something we don't know for sure, and with the whole legal agreement, likely won't ever. At this point, it feels like this is all in the past, and not really worth spending time worrying about, because in the grand scheme of things, it doesn't really matter going forward. The only thing left for people to do is to put pressure on Razbam to work on an agreement where ED can at least get the source code. All I've seen from ED's public statements is that they are continuing to work and open to finding a solution, and it makes sense that they would want to get the source code so they can at least maintain the modules in their current state, even if they aren't able to invest the time into any upgrades or improvements. But that would require Razbam to be open to the idea. I have to imagine the bridges are likely burned beyond Razbam coming back to work with ED. It just seems thoroughly unlikely, at least unless there's a bit change in leadership at Razbam. But it's still possible that Razbam and ED can find a reasonable agreement to turn over the source code. So my only hope is that the people who are here and angry with ED are also over on Razbam's Discord saying they are upset and telling Razbam they really want to see Razbam work hard to find a middle ground with ED that at least lets ED continue to support the modules, even if it's in a pretty reduced capacity.

Just remember there isn't always big teams behind third party projects, managing forums, discord and social media take a lot of time and can be difficult to manage, especially when the project itself takes so much time and effort. I'm sure ASC will do their best to keep you all informed and when we are given information to share we will also share it. thank you

UH-1H and Mi-8MTV be like:

Like IRL, a unit that wheb placed somewhere on the map will form a temporary landing strip (including night landing). The C130 may find itself land somewhere in the middle of nowhere to support special operations