All Activity

The VKB STECS also has (quick switch) detents, dual throttles and indeed a ton more controls. Having so many is not just a benefit in being able to map more stuff, but also that you have more choices in what kind of control you map to what function, and what location you pick. For example, I mapped 'eject' to a recessed button that is both easy to reach, but also very hard to accidentally press. I use the other recessed button for 'jettison', which similarly is not something I want to do by accident. Having many buttons of different types, gives you that sort of options. The STECS not designed to mimic a specific airplane. If you take the spring out of the white up/down lever on the button box (STEM) of the STECS, then you can configure it in the software to be an axis, that you can use for zoom. The Virpil CDT VMax has axis dials that should work for that purpose too. Although I'm always a bit wary about recommending products that are only available for pre-order, as we can only judge their promises, not what they actually deliver. Then again, it is Virpil, so the quality tends to be fine, but not so much the delivery times. Given the very limited number of controls, it seems rather overpriced for what you get. And I doubt that it is really higher quality than the top options of VKB and Virpil. At most there is less to break because it is missing so many features. The Moza throttle doesn't have FFB, just vibration. Only their joystick base is anything special, IMO. Their grips are not very good. So I would definitely mix-and-match if you go for the Moza base.

If the situation with ED and Razbam can be resolved such that I feel safe spending money on DCS again, I would be willing to purchase a "Sweden Assets Pack" in order to pay a reasonable price for AI J-35, JA-37, SF-37, SH-37, etc. 1/72 scale AJ-37 and SK-37s were on my last purchase of model kits...To go with the 1/72 Heller JA-37 that I will probably never get around to building...

Bug reports. if you're failing to launch a missile is that a bug or a realistic failure? Someone who doesn't rtfm will figure it's a bug.

Вероятно, это очередная срытая попытка оскорбления? Вид выбранной кабины может быть разный, я выражаю своё отношение к увиденному. Нравится некоторым «моделям» дефилировать в таком обличие, их право. Что значит «характерен»? У тебя есть «усредненный» вариант для «характерен»?

Further to last, Canted Rendering gives be a much better sweet spot and is a plus for me. Mileage may vary for others, but it I always fly with Canted Rendering on now for much better visuals. I did not immediately notice the improvement when I first tried it because I was so focused on checking the edges of my vision expecting a wider FOV. Happy landings, Talisman

Обвинения формулируются иначе А кто там кто, это мне II Собственно я так и сделал: оценил и имею в виду, что и описал вкратце И напомню, что у нас в России действуют права потребителя, это вам не там

I don't have any 'hard' evidence that I can post to conclusively say one way or the other, but my feelings are the same. I've been reading various war diaries, books, combat reports from the archives, and don't recall ever hearing a report of engines seizing, but you do find words like 'reliable' and 'indestructible' to describe the engine. The temperature gauges remind me of the DCS F-14 or the F-5, where the manuals give a max g of 7.5, and if you hit 7.50001 g the wings catastrophically rip off. Here if you touch red, the engine seizes.

Does anyone know when phases 2 & 3 will be released for the German coldwar map?

Neither do they really. Until it’s done, it’s just hopes and guesswork when it will be done. The real world is just as complex as writing an accurate progress bar.

Just did the same... some great skins there

I feel like the forum has a lot of evidence to the contrary.

Probably not, but I’m hoping it works as well with modded weapons as the FC3.. Many servers allow you to carry AGM-88 and PL-12.

I don’t know what that means, so …. No? They just teach you how to fly airplanes.

I clicked one of the links above to try and find your work in the library but it showed an error. Also any chance for some US Navy versions? VFA 106 in the 4xx series to match our C hornet.

Correct, this one gets me every now and then as well. I’m getting better about it. Follow the dive checklist from the POH prior to entering the dive, and it has you consciously close them, which helps to remember to reopen them after the dive is complete.

у меня такое было из за кабеля,

Sie wird im HUD auch dann angezeigt wenn du den Wegpunkt programmiert hast zur bestimmten Zeit zu erreichen.

To complete my previous com, I confirm my "in game observations" : There is no arguments for Tor destruction on animations null

Thanks for the report, the Anti-Ice System has not be implemented yet and is still on the roadmap to be added, thanks.

Hi @currenthill On certain ships (like the Moskva, Molnya), we can destroy sub-parts, like radar, weapons, etc... I have made a test : Can we destroy the Tor on the Patrol Ship (like a sub-part) ? It seem to be "no". Could we consider making it a subset so that the patrol ship could become a challenge? Thanks for your feedback, and thanks again for your work! null

Didn't see this notification, but you joined and left after being greeted.

Probably never, they will rather work on a free aircraft than fix an age old issue for a paid aircraft

did all that mate, still ends up as a black screen

Zurück in Deutschland auf unserem (vorläufigen) Heimatfliegerhorst Büchel - einige Aufnahmen vom gestrigen Flugbetrieb, der ACT in der TRA205 beinhaltete: Start auf der RWY 03, die Feuerwehr (gesteuert von unserem ATC) hat alles im Blick. Butterfly Setup Dogfighting. Overhead break. Roll-out. Die 1./JG71 "Richthofen" ist auch weiterhin offen für neue Piloten, die Interesse an möglichst realistischem Übungsflugbetrieb der Luftwaffe im Setting der 1980er Jahre haben. Schreib uns eine PN hier im Forum, wenn Dein Interesse geweckt ist. Darüber hinaus suchen wir Kontakt zu "like-minded" virtuellen Staffeln und ATC+TAC/C2, um miteinander oder nebeneinander auf unserem "Cold War Germany NATO Training Server (CWGNTS)" zu fliegen, den virtuellen Himmel zu bevölkern und so gemeinsam eine realistische und immersive Flugverkehrssituation zu schaffen. Auch hier gerne Kontaktaufnahme via PN hier im Forum

After a three weeks long training commando in Norway together with the Joint Task Force Francophone (JTFF), 1./JG71 is back in Germany and populating the Cold War Germany NATO Training Server (CWGNTS). We are reaching out to like-minded milsim squadrons and ATC + TAC/C2 folks that are interested in creating a realistic and immersive military air traffic environment, something like a "VATSIM lite in DCS". Designate your virtual homebase on our server and respective spawning slots and have your squadron training flights here with us. This increases the chance to see other virtual traffic and create a little bit more atmosphere and immersion. It also provides you the opportunity to find like-minded squadrons and stage joint training missions in the growing community of CWGNTS. For ATC folks, you will find realism-minded military training traffic on one single server that ideally gives you more than just a single VFR flight to work with. We offer a chart repository of historical VFR and IFR charts to provide a common (and fixed) set of procedures for both pilots and ATC folks, plus a historically authentic airspace structure of Germany from 1989. Are you member of a virtual squadron or ATC/TAC-C2 and interested of joining the CWGNTS community? Send us a private message here in the forum to get more details and the access data to our Discord. Come fly with us, we are looking forward to seeing you in the pattern and hearing you on frequency!