All Activity

Hi @wired521, thanks you for your reply. Negative...I forced it in 2025 but with Combined Joint Task (RED) I have just category ARMOR. With Russia, under Support and Logistics, I don't find anything. Any solution?

1983 is a bit early for MIG-29 over CW Germany. Unless you're aiming for a scenario where a couple of the very first Soviet aircraft is put into action. From what I can find the MIG-29 was declared fully operational around 1985 and East German Air Force received MIG-29 between 1988-1989.

Damn it. You're the kid who reminds the teacher they didn't assign homework. PLEASE keep this bug!

Does it state otherwise? Because just because it doesn't explicitly state that it can't doesn't mean much. It'd be worth mentioning if it didn't work. So far, I've seen it mentioned either in other countries' manuals or in uncertain terms.

Thanx, From the base, floor, to the top of the stand, before the Moza adapter, it measures 57 cm. From the base to the base of the handle, including the adapter, it measures 63.5 cm. To use it, I reduced the Moza's axes to 60% to avoid leg problems.

So I really can't say which map or server, because this is happening in every one that I've seen so far. Join a server and just watch people's landings with F2. Doesn't matter the aircraft type either. They come in for a normal landing and will bounce around, go through the map, fly up at a crazy rate or even spin sideways. It has gotten worse with the new update. Here are some screenshots as examples. They are doing normal landings and nothing out of the ordinary - once their wheels touch the ground they stay on the ground but shows their jet in the air. It's like a desync or something.

Right on. I found a log with a timestamp in there from the same date and time. This is probably it. dcs.log-20250922-020348.zip

DCS developers throwed a on AMD GPUs even today with newest updated it looks terrible on best graphic settings. Other game developers were far more skilled and hardworking to have good nice results on both GPU producers. How old is this topic? What have been done by ED to fix it?

depends on the airframe. Electric Jets - can’t be bothered. Steampunk Jets - absolutely. More often than not. Mi-8 - Every. Single. Time!

I will try it. I spent more time reading manuals than playing since the release.

Came to DCS for playing a combat flight simulator and ended up learning about types of power lines and their pylons. Life takes interesting corners sometimes

Are you saying they have reported the issue on the Ru side?

Due to recent steam policies- You cannot put a pre-order on DLC unless a release date is given. now, with the Mig29 ED actually put the release date as the very last day of september- and those with a keen eye would notice, that before the pre-order opened on steam, it was marked as either "TBD" or coming soon. But as soon as pre-orders open there has to be a release date. What I have seen 3rd parties do- is to have the product release on steam on launch day- and keep the pre-order discount applied on the steam store for a week or two, HB did it with the Phantom since they avoided opening pre-orders on steam, so they offered the equivalent discount amount for a few weeks post- release.

Спасибо! Заказал, посмотрим что придет

Same was happening to me during first Corsair flights after installing last week patch. With everything seemingly centered, plane required full left aileron trim just to stay somewhat level, it was also loosing all directional stability when slowing down for landing and once it failed to retract right main landing gear even though I didn't hit any ground object that might cause damage. First check of the forum if other users were reporting the same returned nothing, so I disabled my mods, ran a repair (not even full one, only the fast one) and enabled mods. Problem disappeared (for the time being, at least). I guess something got messed up during that loooong and slow patch download and installation process. Try repair youself, maybe it'll fix the issue for you as well.

Hi Jef, Wonderful catch! For sure I will fix it. I will use the armaments a bit more to mature my knowledge about its employment by the Fulcrum and I will release vs 1.1, but rest assured that I will use your video reference as a guide line. Tks a lot.

The Operation Firestorm mission seems like it would be an easy thing, Ike you mention but I still can’t get it!! My first try was really bad. I flew way too high and got dropped, as I should have!! The second I couldn’t get George to shoot on the target!! Then since he wouldn’t fire I got confused and thought maybe they were friendly and as I closed the distance I paid the price Again!!! Ughh!! I love it though!! I’ll post a Part three when I actually finish it which I’m hoping is very soon! I flew a few slots on your Rototheads Sandbox and had a lot of fun with it!! What a great idea and you put so much work into it! I looked at the mission in the ME and it blew my mind how much stuff is in there!! I did run into an issue that I wanted to ask you or point out. In the RED missions with the Mi24P Hind where you attack the Tank platoon on the front; The ground units do not shoot at each other nor did the Blue side shoot at me in the Hind, even when I flew right over them. Is that a setting I am supposed to set or choose or is that how it’s supposed to be? On other missions like in the Kiowa they definitely shot back at me! Big time!!! So I wanted to ask you about this. Thank you and thanks for making these missions, such a great idea!! I hope you make one for Afghanistan since it’s such a cool map!! This is a perfect mission idea for people who get DCS and just don’t know what to do in it or don’t want to spend the time in the ME to make a mission. This allows you to choose from a ton of different missions and it’s a lot of fun!!! Thank you again.

https://giphy.com/gifs/blakelivelyfan-who-me-oh-is-it-O93Bd3yrt1ozxWmU0i

Yes, that seems to be the problem, but still, is only broken in the Hornet, not on other airframes that can also display maps in their cockpits. Mission editor is fine too, you can see the map at any scale. Could be a map issue, but it only manifests on the F-18 for some reason. As far as I know, only happens on Syria and Marianas, (which is an ED map, that´s why it seems so strange to me). I also don´t understand the completely lack of priority with this bug, when less important others are fixed in weeks. I know is not a main issue, but it will be really nice to see it sorted out. Thank you for the answer

Ну как бы да

Yeah agreed, the best we can do period wise in DCS, is F4/14(early) vs the 29 for a vaguely peer setup. Which does fit iran/iraq (The very end of it) or would also fit CW germany for 83 or therabouts, since the bulk of the luftwaffe and most other allied airforces were flying F4's, F5's, and f104s (coming soon tm). There were only a few barely working F15's in theatre (3 squadrons), and a few F16/A10 squadrons as well for the USAF, but it was a transition period then. Would be nice to have gotten that 23 to flesh out the 70's era, but it is what it is. And the new Su-17/22 mod looks pretty good, so hopefully that will come soon as well to flesh out the period AF's. As for the 29, its a fairly typical ED release. The most annoying thing being IFF not working in MP, but that seems to be a literal ED trademark at this point, cuz it didn't work with the F18 or 16 on release either IIRC, I'm hoping the "week1" patch fixes that. Also, hopefully the SPO gets "Fixed" so it works as it should based on the feedback in the other thread (not really sure why they did it like that in the first place). And then the COOP modes for the radar/IR. On the upside, I'm actually stunned that the IRST sees clouds, so hopefully IR missiles will see them (and be blocked) soon(tm).

One by design the mig-29 can't use the air brake with the fuel tank. Two. Make sure you have the tank jettison cover in the uncovered position, or you can't jetison the tank. Jetisoning the tank requires 2 key bindings, or looking around the front of the stick to click the button cover.

Комрады, а на чем сошлись по поводу размеров изображения на ИЛС? В реале тоже все такое маленькое?

Yea agreed with alot of what you have wrote. That said i would also say it's never been in a better state that what we have now. F4 vs Mig 29 in the BVR role will be interesting, but yea inclose put me in the mig everytime lol, countermeasures, not needed! I've noticed a few wacky things with certain fox 1 shots tracking post launch and post lock lost, interesting, on non emitting (HOJ) targets. I need to replicate and turn on track recording though to get it posted (still playing around at present and just having fun). F14A is by far the most competant, especially if your in the back seat at range. The 29 will not compete up high with that. But for me it will be used in close, sneak, pull up attacks in places with lots of terrain cover to dip into and pull right up into high flying targets. The fox 2's 73's seem to have had a boost also, unless im just getting alot of "lucky" shots. I think there is going to be a lot of fun as this era pads out more - also big advocate of the F1, despite its radar being "cheat" mode at present but that aside its great fun. As for the sea harriers, the chaff bundle in the airbrakes was a thing, i think it was more for the early days however and/or the fear of roland, but don't quote me on that. They would have benefited though no doubt from a whole host of ECM from other assets too not airborne. Your first point, 100% - there is a reason why flares are emergency jettisonable enmasse!