Furia

Has ED already announced which would be the aircraft transport module? Since the initial announcement was in September, I was expecting at leats to learn wich aircarft would be the selected one (while dreaming for the C-130) Any news? Any hints? Maybe a Christmas present and let us know?

Since the last update, in the Mission Editor I cannot see the painted deck lines in the Super carrier or in the Tarawa. I mean the fould lines, elevator lines ect. That makes placing statics in deck a complicated task

There are so many different things that you can do with an C-130 that this could be the most versatile and useful module in DCS For instance

For all the Herk fans I do recommend you this channel

I wiil buy it in the very minute that is available for pre-purchase. I would have prefered an H model that fits in modern but also in 70s and 80s scenarios and had steam gauges, but I also love the awesome Super Hercules. Said this I would be the happiest guy with any high quailty version of the Herky in DCS. Best aircraft ever built ! And for all of the Hercules lovers I do recommend you this youtube channel

It is not very accurate. At least this is not normal that you have 22 knots of Wing at surface level and just at 1600 feet you just have 47 knots. It could happen but it is surely not the normal gradient. It is normal that you have a higher wind speed the higher you fly but more than 100% in just 1600 feet is not a usual phenomena. It almost meets the criteria as what is defined in aviation as Wind Shear 30 knots different wind speed in a relatively short distance. Does not reach that level but it is very close. I hope this is eventually addressed.

In my case I need some extra time for the login but when trying to logout the screen stays black for long time until I force Windows to close it. Have not attempted to make any multiplayer so today

Since the implemented system is a mix between what it can be shown that is not classified and a usable interface for the simulation, I believe nobody would object that we have the possibility of managing the internal neworks as mentioned by the OP even in a non ultrarealistic way since that would be classified. I would suggest using a smiliar approach than with the A-10C. This could be a useful feature for multiplayer flights when for a reason or another the mission editor have not placed the airplanes together as a "Flight" but where players decide to cooperate and operate as a flight

Yes I have seen this multiple times lately while hosting for some friends. I was at the LSO station wtaching the whole maneuver and I saw the LSO give a grade and my friend received a different one, we even checked the debrief.log and that was confirmed. The LSO grading in the SC needs more adjusting. You can make a 3 minute groove and still get a nice score. We are currently using AIRBOSS to make our landing grades since the SC LSO is not very good. With the SC LSO we got such a huge number that OK 5 points passes that is ridiculous and unbelievable. I love the SC but it really needs some attention.

I would love to have an ED C-130 with full system modelled. This aircraft can simply do so many things, from carrying paratroopers, cargo, vehicles to being a tanker, a command and control ship or a gunship............probably the aircraft with more different roles in the history of military aircraft. Almost a multirole aircraft. Instant buy for me

Is there any possibility of having the excellent Mod of the L-61 and its F-100 naval escorts included? The mod not only includes the Spanish and Australian versions of thos ships but but aditionally some additional LPD ship This would allow us to operate Harriers and helicopters not only from the LHA but also from the L61 This is a ver high quality Mod one of the best naval mods available in DCS. It could be downloaded here and it would be a great alternative for the LHA Thanks

This is most strange. This mission is a very simple one with one huey plus a FARP and its 4 vehicles. has nothing else. You should be able to open it in the mission editor o launch it as single player mision. If you cannor do this with this simple and clean miz then youn have a bigger issue in your DCS installation.

Sure. Here you have. You have GPU, fuel, repair and rearm. Test Huey Rearm FARP.miz

Try the attached mission. It is a test simple one. I tested and it works with no problem. Can you rearm usually other modules like fighters? If the problem only happnes with the UH-1H I would suggest you go to the module manager and uninstall the UH-1H Module (no need to reinstall the full game) and install the module again (it is fast and simple). Then try again. Test Huey Rearm.miz

This is a fantastic Mod however the latest update fo the release version has made that in some aircraft like the Harrier, when you move your head around there is a floating RWR pannel near the possition of your head. As far as I know this was not happening before. it works fine in the Huey and I have just seen this in the Harrier. I am not sure if other aircraft are affected Can you please review the MOD with the actual release version and address this issue? Thanks a lot!!

Try the solution I posted above. It worked for me and it is quite simple

Simply go to your Windows security, check the DCS file placed in quarentine and in "actions"select the option "Restore". Launch the updater again and it should work. It worked for me. This is an screen of the Windows Security Panel. Find the History of Threads and restore the DCS file. My windows is in Spanish but I think it is pretty self-explanatory

The NAT VOR Station is located in a middle of a forest surrounded by trees which is surely not how a VOR station is constructed. I am attaching here a pic of the real one and the DCS version. Would it be possible to clear up the trees on this area?

Thanks a lot for sharing. I have been searching this one for a while! There is an option for steam users on DCS, „specials“ ion the Hercules module. Make sure the „steam version box“ it is activated before launching a mision with the Hercules.

Hi Bignewy. I am attaching here the track. I am using the Stable version and the test mision used for this track has no Mods. Before the test I have uninstalled and installed again the NS430. I have observed the same behaviour in other terrains like in Syria although I did this track in a clean Caucasus map. Thanks for taking a look at this. NS430_ETA_BUG.trk

I can rearm and refuel with no problems in the Release version. Are you using the Open beta or release (Stable) version? Have you tried this in a normal airport associated to your "side" or only in FARP?

Update topic with pictures to describe better the issue

When flying a flight plan using the NAVDef Page and having added the "user defined field" of ETA, this one only provide a more or less accurate number related to the first waypoint of the route while for the next waypoints the figure is incorrect. ETE works nice as intended but ETA does not. I am using Local 24hrs time format in myz NS430 configuration. The clock works properly. It is just the ETA figure to the next waypoint that provides incorrect information. Can you guys please take a look at this?

This MOD is simply awesome and it opens an huge amount of possibilities Thank you!! I would be real happy if they became 3rd Party Project. The potential for an Hercules in DCS is incredible. The air war is not only fighters and we already have a large amount of those. Additional assets such a properly designed Hercules, would change our DCS battlefield options the same way the inclusion of helicopters in DCS did.

This is indeed badly needed, it is a realistic functionality of any GPS or modern navigation equipment and surely not difficult to implement. Having to manually configure all this setup configuration each and every flight is a real pain and I would really appreciate if we are given an option to save the setup configuration at leats of the NAVdef main page fields. Thanks