johnv2pt0

You could add a couple more groups and then activate them in sequence. Have 3 red groups and 3 blue for example. Then you could always have at least a couple groups up before the first one despawns/respawns. Not a great solution, but only thing I can think of of the top of my head.

Right, thanks.

Has anyone had any luck with this?

Wow, looks awesome! Can not wait to give you some American kronas!

Roger thanks!

Are the jagged edges on the taxi/landing lights part of the DCS engine or is there a graphical setting that can smooth it out? I've been unable to change any settings that fix it. GTX 980Ti for reference Sorry if this has been addressed already as it seems it probably has but I can't find anything on it. Thanks ~ (stolen screenshot from another post showing example)

I think the Su-25 FML is a nice variant. Short legs and minimal payload, but boy is she ever fast! Borrowed from youtube:

Not sure what's on 3rd party developer's radar so I'm just listing everything. In no particular order: F-100 F-111 F-15E A-7 OV-10 P-38 Mig-27 SU-22 AH-1W/Z AH-64 Any ground pounding mama-jamma

You mean this one from ... MARCH 3rd! ...inspiring confidence or good will aviodev is not. https://forums.eagle.ru/showpost.php?p=2700390&postcount=37

Thanks, will try it out.

ED/mods can you confirm this has been placed on your reported bugs list please? This bug makes most missions impossible to play.

Hi, did you ever get this resolved? I'm having the same issue when flying with multiple clients since update.

This. But having done AR IRL myself I will also tell you that this is just what is supposed to happen. It all depends on the skill of the tanker and environmental conditions too. These numbers get to precontact but after that it really doesn't matter what he's flying...you just fly formation off him like any other formation. I've had some tankers vary wildly on the speeds when flying with autopilot off. Sometimes the tanker will communicate what he's doing, usually this isn't the case though. More often the boom operator will give you distances when you're close, but this isn't even always the case. I would say about half the time I would get a plug without any communication at all (except to confirm fuel transfer loads and stuff). In some combat situations there is ZERO communication at all. You fly to make your ARCT and go from there...no radio (in current operations though this is rare) DCS tankers are pretty terrible...they will do crazy stuff like slowing to stall speeds and then when contact is made speeding up like 100 knts. Try not to get discouraged...it's pretty tough in some ways in the sim.

Andrew, #2/3 can be solved by adding flags on the spawn group lines and then running that check in the conditions. You might have to slightly change your repeater logic, I'm not sure because it's late and I'm tired! But I have done what you have and it works great so that if it tries to spawn something that already has been it keeps trying until it gets one that works. So on your spawn group line in the actions add another flag to signify it has been done (say flag 23), and in the same trigger conditions check that flag 23 is false and make sure that's the first line in the conditions. Hope that kinda makes sense and helps.

Right now anybody you see in DCS has a weapon in their hands. It would be nice to have an infantry type unit with no weapon to populate those cities.

I'd give you a dollar every time someone asks for an update if you could restrain yourself from making some developer apologist propaganda post. And if you really don't like the fluff in these threads you don't need to add to it. Thanks for the update Aviodev! Please keep them coming.

I didn't know the switch between 1.5s was so easy. Thanks all, much appreciated

Haven't checked in a bit...are mp servers running beta or stable? Thanks for the replies, not able to check right now.

I need to free up some space of my SSD. Versions of 1.5 and 1.5 Beta seem to be the same. Can I get rid of one or the other? Thanks ~

Love it.

:thumbup:

What kind of information is the hud giving you? Is it simply a boresight with depression settings?

Just a guess, but I'm pretty sure RAZBAM has been big in the FSX sim, so perhaps a lot of the development of the M-2000C can be thought of as a "port" from fsx > dcs. I Don't know for sure, but they're an established sim maker whereas some of the others are just starting so that probably helps a lot on development times. Also, it's always going to be different based on the actual tech they're simulating. For the F-14 something that seems fairly simple like variable sweep wings is actually insanely complicated aero engineering.

Aviodev should recognize that people complaining is actually a compliment. You don't yern for that which you don't like/want. :) ...and then they should give the people what they want. I'd be flying nothing else if it came out tomorrow.

Awesome thanks. Edit: 435mb! Why?! lol...it better contain 4 times the awesomeness...