Gierasimov

GRs apparently. Check their YT if you want.

Quite good progress. Only CV-16 AI J-15 AI seem outstanding now

Cyprus - https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/3317166/

Interesting lead.

Please post a track and report a bug. You know how it goes, no track - no bug.

I wonder if there is a magical way to trigger a flag when player points TGP cross at an object. Say JTAC does the talk on for a building, player points to that building with TGP and flag is set or action triggered.

Hopefully. I was expecting it for Marianas release as it was announced in January 2020.

I noticed that a single MAVF to a ZTZ-96B tank kills the tank and also buildings that are 100 / 160 / 240 meters away. How did these got hit then? No zones / triggers / scripts used in mission. BUG CHECK.trk

There are no functional parity between redfor and bluefor goals in DCS as I see it. DCS is not about "MP balance". I am looking forward to BS3 very much. All we know is that BS3 is still in works, and could release this year still. While Apache is also said to be available this year, I don't see how the one would affect the other, neither why it should. Everything is subject to change, so we will see.

I know. I want that on the Kuznetsov.

You are right, we should aim for the AI MiG-29KR

OK then, fingers crossed they will get it just right with the new tech.

Means it is a fix. it will be in one of the next beta updates, but we can try it now if we can't wait.

If that statement is based on your subject matter expertise, it would be good if you could "prove" this with relevant documentation to the ED, so that perhaps DCS could benefit from it.

@vegasparis Many times I trapped Su-33 on the SC and took off too. Recently I saw a YT of somebody landing and getting airborne with MiG-21 as well. It is a fantasy, but it is doable.

Once we get dynamic wind with the new clouds, this will be really needed. For now, the way to do is to design the mission as needed, including carrier BRC to achieve appropriate wind over deck.

It all started with Hornet and evolved into "we are working on it as a core feature common to all modules", so I don't expect that to be possible for Apache only. It will be introduced at some point. Hopefully.

So while pilot does his job, CP/G does this, right? ED mentioned this is something they would like to do in the future.

OK, so you can fly 8.1 alpha hands off in DCS now, why do I need maintenance sub page to set my trim for?

Charge $10 for A-10CII was for the A-10C owners.

https://www.digitalcombatsimulator.com/en/files/2744241/

It was discussed some time ago in the DCS Missiles thread (Russian) and it was mentioned ED sees no problem in that. Since several updates back I was able to kill R77s with AIM120 / AIM9X with 100% probability. So, if ED feels shooting down R77 is appropriate, I don't see why Phoenix would be not. New era for DCS. go hunt those missiles now. As far as Phoenix goes, I wish Hornet had it, would serve nicely in lieu of TALD.

I know for sure UH-60A and OH-58D cannot be tasked with carrier landing. I am just saying we should enable all rotary wing aircraft to do that as per mission designer.

We need that for the AI as well. Both, take off and landing. For all helicopters, we should be allowed to set AI to land at CVN / LHA boats.

I like the fact that one can use keyboard bindings to some of the comms via Options > Controls > Communications category. I would like to see that expanded for AAR and ATC. Other than that, navigating comms menu with keyboard arrows or joystick hat would go far, I don't expect to talk natively to DCS to control communications as I believe that amount of work would justify shifting the task to DCS 5.0. VIACOM PRO just does not cut it for me.