Jump to content

upyr1

Members
  • Posts

    4382
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    5

Everything posted by upyr1

  1. I asked HB about that here is the thread and basically they said yes. So if you could get the thud module going just contact them if you are doing the F or G
  2. Don't for get the deisgnationg EWO though GIB might be best. Anyway We RIght now Jester is the best AI GIB we have. I'd love to see ED develop a better GIB AI but I'd rather have the F or G before then. Anyway I figure the D is a must have. The Wild Weasel at the minimum should be an AI asset combined with a better EW modeling. I'd love the F or G because my dad was an EWO and I don't expect an EB-66 module
  3. then the G would be interesting too. I know if I were to do the F or G I would licence Jester from HB
  4. The idea is simple a lot of air bases have static items placed on them. It would be nice to have them change based on the assigned owner and period.
      • 2
      • Like
  5. They can merge the threads
  6. The JA-37 was the fighter variant of the JA-37. There were two basic versions the original Ja-37 and the Ja-37D the original one could carry skyflash while the D was armed with AMRAAMs. I don't know how hard it would be to have both of them, but it would be awesome to add it to DCS
  7. The F9F Panther, P-38 Lighting, and English Electric lighting would be awesome
      • 2
      • Like
  8. I hope you can find someone who would be willing to do that, you did some good work.
  9. Same, I'd be fine with just having infantry stand there and look like its the crew
  10. Is @currenthill trying to submit them to ED? https://www.currenthill.com/currenthill-milsim
  11. I don't expect to get all 3 unless we do it as a mod. I can enter LAU values I don't know diddly about 3d modeling, I don't know C++ well enough but I figure if anyone has the know how we could get started on the thud mod
  12. I'd like to see what we can get about either one, before completely eliminating one or the other. Know how DCS normally does the most advanced if we could get the documents for both we would get the G.
  13. I figured there would be software available to calculate RCS the real issue though is how much computer power it would take to add the algorithms to DCS.
  14. Do you think there would be much interest in the G or would that be better off as AI?
  15. Nothing stops us from doing that except we want the correct cockpit for the full A-10A experience
  16. The real question is how many variants do we need of a given unit? That would need to be dictated by whatever the minimal number to cover the service period and major weapons changes For example let's take a look at the B-5 . Only 3 B-52 variants saw combat the D, G, and H. I have the H in a modern configuration which will only be correct for scenarios before 1992 when they removed the tail gun. I believe when the H had the gun the only noticeable difference between the G and H were the G had .50 calibers while the H had a vulcan. The D had a different vertical stabilizer. I think if we went by the "good enough standard" So at a bare minimum the only additional Buff we would need is the G as we would get the tailgun which be necessary for a period correct cold war B-52.
  17. A Su-25 module would be awesome. Then the dream scenario would be a two-fer pack with the A and T
  18. I've got a little more personal connection. Prior going to medical school my dad was an EWO and had time on the Thud and EB-66. He trained on the Thud but deployed on a EB-66 I want the Thud to live again. Thud.
  19. What were the F-5s in question like when the Swiss bought them in the first place?
  20. good questions
×
×
  • Create New...